Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Trump gives highly classified information to the Russians
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostDo we know what the inconclusive evidence is?
What is the weak (not sufficient to charge) evidence in this case?
Still, that's more than just a little suspicious, wouldn't you say?Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostYou could say that about literally any case for which there is no evidence.
"Oh, well, there's 'evidence', it's just not conclusive or of high confidence, so we're pretty sure he's guilty even though we can't actually prove it."
Like I said, I hope conspiracy nuts like you and Jimmy never serve on a jury.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostOnce again, I find it impossible to tell the difference between biting sarcasm and liberal delusion.
"It's a coverup, I tell you! That's the only reason there's no evidence, because they covered it all up, man! The lack of evidence is evidence! Wake-up, people!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostDifficult to debate with someone like you MM, who seems to be too mentally incompetent to either comprehend or respond to what is actually said. Did I contend that there was no evidence? No, just the opposite, I said that there was plenty of evidence. I understand that you don't seem know the difference between evidence and proof, but I think thats just a bit of cognative dissonance on your part brought about by your extreme case of bias.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charles View PostI would not use those words but I agree with your point that when discussing with MM one is often made to repeat the same points again and again since he repeatedly misrepresents what you actually say. And it is obvious that he does not understand the difference between evidence and proof nor the difference between undergoing investigation and being in court.
These special investigations are often used to harass an official, the people in charge already aware that it will ultimately go nowhere.
As evidence of that let me suggest that real investigations are rarely this public.
Ultimately, damming evidence may be revealed to the public, but until that time the assertion that this is just a circus to harm a President is not without precedence.Actually YOU put Trump in the White House. He wouldn't have gotten 1% of the vote if it wasn't for the widespread spiritual and cultural devastation caused by progressive policies. There's no "this country" left with your immigration policies, your "allies" are worthless and even more suicidal than you are and democracy is a sick joke that I hope nobody ever thinks about repeating when the current order collapses. - Darth_Executor striking a conciliatory note in Civics 101
Comment
-
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostHonestly, I think you have to meet MM half way and recognize his point (which you may have already done).
These special investigations are often used to harass an official, the people in charge already aware that it will ultimately go nowhere.
As evidence of that let me suggest that real investigations are rarely this public.
Ultimately, damming evidence may be revealed to the public, but until that time the assertion that this is just a circus to harm a President is not without precedence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostYou seem unwilling to face the issue that the accusations of wrongdoing against Trump are grounded in fact and not a conspiracy to harass and harm him.
I've not seen any evidence of that (I'm not saying it doesn't exist, I've just not seen it yet).Actually YOU put Trump in the White House. He wouldn't have gotten 1% of the vote if it wasn't for the widespread spiritual and cultural devastation caused by progressive policies. There's no "this country" left with your immigration policies, your "allies" are worthless and even more suicidal than you are and democracy is a sick joke that I hope nobody ever thinks about repeating when the current order collapses. - Darth_Executor striking a conciliatory note in Civics 101
Comment
-
Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View PostHonestly, I think you have to meet MM half way and recognize his point (which you may have already done).
These special investigations are often used to harass an official, the people in charge already aware that it will ultimately go nowhere.
As evidence of that let me suggest that real investigations are rarely this public.
Ultimately, damming evidence may be revealed to the public, but until that time the assertion that this is just a circus to harm a President is not without precedence.
He seems convinced that there is nothing to any of this while I allow for two possible outcomes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassmoron View PostBut there IS increasing circumstantial evidence...
That's basically where we are with this "investigation".Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimLamebrain View PostDifficult to debate with someone like you MM, who seems to be too mentally incompetent to either comprehend or respond to what is actually said. Did I contend that there was no evidence? No, just the opposite, I said that there was plenty of evidence. I understand that you don't seem know the difference between evidence and proof, but I think thats just a bit of cognative dissonance on your part brought about by your extreme case of bias.
Jimmy!
I already laid out the whole thing about "evidence" earlier in the thread, in case you missed it:
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...l=1#post443975
Basically, the statue of "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt" exists so that morons like you who might wind up on a jury don't convict someone of a crime because there is "circumstantial evidence" that he happened to live on the same street as the murder victim but no evidence that he actually committed a crime.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charles View PostI have written about it quite many times. But just to mention some: Warnings from foreign intelligence services, the Flynn case, the trail of dead Russians, the Trump-dossier claimed to exist in Russia, giving highly classified information to the Russians. And i have just written some other stuff here which is interesting as well: http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...l=1#post443983
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seer, Today, 11:40 AM
|
2 responses
31 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Diogenes
Today, 03:28 PM
|
||
Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 06:30 AM
|
15 responses
79 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Today, 04:20 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 11:24 AM
|
25 responses
144 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
Today, 04:13 PM
|
||
Started by carpedm9587, Yesterday, 09:13 AM
|
43 responses
239 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 08:07 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, 06-02-2024, 09:15 AM
|
31 responses
150 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 08:12 PM
|
Comment