Yeah, he's totally a sockpuppet of Putin.
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Trump: Only stupid people don't want relationship with Russia
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostYeah, he's totally a sockpuppet of Putin.
You already have P u t in there. Then notice how the lowercase "r" really looks like an "i"? and the "m" looks like an "n"?
Trump = Putrm. it's staring your right in the face!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostObviously! Look at his name: T r u m p.
You already have P u t in there. Then notice how the lowercase "r" really looks like an "i"? and the "m" looks like an "n"?
Trump = Putrm. it's staring your right in the face!
In the Democrat & Republican "fake" dirt files on Donald it is revealed that a 21yo Margaret Thatcher seduced the almost six year old Donald and they produced an unwanted child they named Fred, who they sold to a passing circus on its way to St. Petersburg.
In St. Petersburg, Maria Ivanovna Putina saw the baby crying in a basket and deciding it was neglected, she absconded with the child (not long before she had lost two of her youngest children).
She took the child home and begged her spouse (Vladimir Spiridonovich Putin) to let her keep him. After a lot of nagging he relented and they named the child Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. The rest is history...
It has always plagued Donald's conscience that he had let Margaret convince him to sell Fred to the gypsies. Psychoanalysts in the know say this is why he has always sought children of his own, and why he wants a relationship with Putin (better late than never)
Also the same psychoanalysts, suggest that Donald's tryst with MT is why Donald has had such a turbulent association with women.
It must be true, because I heard the intelligence was deduced by a USA private investigator who specialised in gathering dirt on people, who was paid separately by both by the Democrats & anti-Trump Republicans to get dirt on Trump. This PI paid a British ex-Ambassador to Russia to find a source for dirt on Trump. The BxAR paid an ex-MI6 agent to get dirt on Trump, who paid sub-contractors in Russia to get dirt on Trump. These reported back that they paid the 5th cousin, of their aunty's best friend, who knew a taxi driver who was considered a reliable source.
I also heard that the Kremlin on hearing about the "fake dozier" arrested the taxi driver and under interrogation he admitted, he complained to the fellow about his bunions. They never discussed Putin or Trump...The taxi driver also recalled that on that night there was a lite drizzle of rain and the street lights gave it a golden sheen...Last edited by elam; 01-13-2017, 11:55 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by elam View PostYou have it backwards...
In the Democrat & Republican "fake" dirt files on Donald it is revealed that a 21yo Margaret Thatcher seduced the almost six year old Donald and they produced an unwanted child they named Fred, who they sold to a passing circus on its way to St. Petersburg.
In St. Petersburg, Maria Ivanovna Putina saw the baby crying in a basket and deciding it was neglected and decided to abscond with the child (not long before she had lost two of her youngest children).
She took the child home and begged her spouse (Vladimir Spiridonovich Putin) to let her keep him. After a lot of nagging he relented and they named the child Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. The rest is history...
It has always plagued Donald's conscience that he had let Margaret convince him to sell Fred to the gypsies. Psychoanalysts in the know say this is why he has always sought children of his own, and why he wants a relationship with Putin (better late than never)
Also the same psychoanalysts, suggest that Donald's tryst with MT is why Donald has had such a turbulent association with women.
It must be true, because I heard the intelligence was deduced by a USA private investigator who specialised in gathering dirt on people, who was paid separately by both by the Democrats & anti-Trump Republicans to get dirt on Trump. This PI paid a British ex-Ambassador to Russia to find a source for dirt on Trump. The BxAR paid an ex-MI6 agent to get dirt on Trump, who paid sub-contractors in Russia to get dirt on Trump. These reported back that they paid the 5th cousin, of their aunty's best friend, who knew a taxi driver who was considered a reliable source.
The Kremlin on hearing about the "fage news" arrested the taxi driver and under interrogation he admitted, he complained to fellow about his bunions.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by elam View PostYou really should start reading the international press portals. The dosiers have made the USA one big joke. No one believes the accusations - not even the FBI. They can't be substantiated, and everyone (even CNN & the Washington Post) agrees there are so many holes & contradictions in the dosier that there is only one conclusion - they are a transparent fabrication...
Comment
-
Given your proclivity for ignoring evidence that doesn't fit with your pet beliefs, and your eagerness to believe the worst of those you disagree with, it is credible that taking these 'allegations' at all seriously is just a manifestation of your anti-Trump neurosis. Far-fetched? I don't think so....>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostNot so fast. The allegations have been deemed credible...
From reports in the USA press, the FBI doesn't find the dossier credible. The FBI reports that there are errors in timing, internal inconsistencies etc That is why no ethical news portal would touch it - well except for CNN who placed a disclaimer in their original article which said none of the contents were verifiable. Then Buzzfeed published the dossier and within a few hours thereafter its editor in chief sent out a memo explaining that even though nothing in the dossier could be substantiated the editorial committee decided to publish for the sake of journalistic transparency. Not even their own staff are buying that one.
Originally posted by Tassman View Post...not yet proven, but worth investigating and currently getting top level scrutiny.
Originally posted by Tassman View PostAnd, given Trump's known genital-grabbing behaviour, are they really so far fetched? I don't think so.
Democrat supporters are so use to the Clintons, that they need to believe that guys like Trump are as perverse as they have become, and so need to be fed with perception rather than fact.
Who needs substantiation when you have innuendo. The press needs scandal to get customers and thus advertising revenue - the truth just gets in the way of a good story...
For instance: Way back when they plagued Rita Hayworth, once billed as the most beautiful woman in the world, saying she was constantly drunk, when in fact she had Parkinson's...Last edited by elam; 01-14-2017, 03:12 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MaxVel View PostGiven your proclivity for ignoring evidence that doesn't fit with your pet beliefs, and your eagerness to believe the worst of those you disagree with, it is credible that taking these 'allegations' at all seriously is just a manifestation of your anti-Trump neurosis. Far-fetched? I don't think so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by elam View PostCredible to whom? Not even McCain could evaluate the content of the dossier, which is why he says he turned it over to the FBI to evaluate them...Thats short hand for either he knew the doc was fake or he deduced it didn't ring true...
One of many such sources if you'd taken the time to Google.
From reports in the USA press, the FBI doesn't find the dossier credible. The FBI reports that there are errors in timing, internal inconsistencies etc That is why no ethical news portal would touch it - well except for CNN who placed a disclaimer in their original article which said none of the contents were verifiable. Then Buzzfeed published the dossier and within a few hours thereafter its editor in chief sent out a memo explaining that even though nothing in the dossier could be substantiated the editorial committee decided to publish for the sake of journalistic transparency. Not even their own staff are buying that one.
Actually, it is getting no attention at any level. As we speak the FBI has bigger problems. They are currently being investigated by Congress for their pursuit of Clinton before the election.
People like you dislike Trump because he is independent of the system. Because he is rich and privileged, he can't be bought off. Therefore he must be debauched (Even if he is, he is a minnow compared to the Clintons).
Democrat supporters are so use to the Clintons, that they need to believe that guys like Trump are as perverse as they have become, and so need to be fed with perception rather than fact.
Who needs substantiation when you have innuendo. The press needs scandal to get customers and thus advertising revenue - the truth just gets in the way of a good story...
For instance: Way back when they plagued Rita Hayworth, once billed as the most beautiful woman in the world, saying she was constantly drunk, when in fact she had Parkinson's...Last edited by Tassman; 01-14-2017, 04:15 AM.
Comment
-
Gee, why won't Tassmoron visit the following thread where the fake story has been thoroughly discussed?
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...rump-to-Russia
Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostGee, why won't Tassmoron visit the following thread where the fake story has been thoroughly discussed?
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...rump-to-Russia
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostWhen even MSNBC blasted BuzzFeed for publishing fake news then you know it's as fake as fake can be.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostI am curious to see what Starlight thinks about whether the USA should try to have good relations with Russia or not. He is the super pacifist who complains about how evil America is, sending troops everywhere and pushing everyone around with our military power.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by eider, Today, 12:12 AM
|
0 responses
20 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by eider
Today, 12:12 AM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 12:53 PM
|
0 responses
109 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sam
Yesterday, 01:07 PM
|
||
Started by Diogenes, 06-14-2024, 08:57 PM
|
55 responses
227 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Diogenes
Today, 07:10 AM
|
||
Started by carpedm9587, 06-14-2024, 11:25 AM
|
44 responses
240 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 07:33 AM
|
||
Started by seer, 06-14-2024, 10:38 AM
|
14 responses
73 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
06-14-2024, 03:43 PM
|
Comment