The Universe Shouldn't Exist...

[Sparko]

***sneaks in***



Yeah but its unlikely to exist, since if it did the whole universe would likely have already been turned into strange matter.

It just hasn't gotten here yet. Space is big. really big. You wait. Just when the Vogons get the new hyperspace express route finished the Strange Matter will destroy the galaxy.

[Jedidiah]

. . . Yeah but its unlikely to exist, since if it did the whole universe would likely have already been turned into strange matter.

The whole universe is already strange matter. That is why we have trouble detecting it.

[Sparko]

The whole universe is already strange matter. That is why we have trouble detecting it.

watching the news and the liberals lately, I believe it.

[37818]

***sneaks in***



Yeah but its unlikely to exist, since if it did the whole universe would likely have already been turned into strange matter.



Heat death is inevitable, regardless of the rate of the expansion. That is until God winds up the clock again.

***sneaks out***

" . . . O my God, . . . Of old hast thou laid the foundation of the earth: and the heavens are the work of thy hands. They shall perish, but thou shalt endure: yea, all of them shall wax old like a garment; as a vesture shalt thou change them, and they shall be changed: . . ." -- Psalm 102:24-26.

[shunyadragon]

You frequently miss humor and assume it to be something else. You must be a real riot at parties.

I do Mime, Stand up comedy, and Burlesque. No problem.

Sparko's anti-science history underlies his sarcasm and his agenda.

[Cow Poke]

I do Mime, Stand up comedy, and Burlesque. No problem.

Sparko's anti-science history underlies his sarcasm and his agenda.

Weak attempt at humor noted.

[Sparko]

wow, I am anti-science now because I question Shunya promoting guesses as science.

[shunyadragon]

Weak attempt at humor noted.

Lack of a coherent response noted

[Cow Poke]

Lack of a coherent response noted

Yeah, you did that, also.

[shunyadragon]

wow, I am anti-science now because I question Shunya promoting guesses as science.

The work of Vilenkin (ridiculously and unethically selectively cited by seer) Guth, Hawking, Krauss and others are not guesses in science. This is a problem with you anti-science agenda, and accepting only Newtonian evidence to support science.

[Sparko]

The work of Vilenkin (ridiculously and unethically selectively cited by seer) Guth, Hawking, Krauss and others are not guesses in science. This is a problem with you anti-science agenda, and accepting only Newtonian evidence to support science.

um what?

You seem to just make up stuff in your head and then believe it is reality.

[TheLurch]

Lack of a coherent response noted

So i do a detailed, point-by-point discussion of issues, and he dismisses that as too verbose.

Cow Poke does a short, cogent comment, and that gets dismissed as a lack of coherent response.

Why don't you just give us a word count of what you'd deem acceptable so that we know how to properly engage in discussions with you?

[Sparko]

So i do a detailed, point-by-point discussion of issues, and he dismisses that as too verbose.

Cow Poke does a short, cogent comment, and that gets dismissed as a lack of coherent response.

Why don't you just give us a word count of what you'd deem acceptable so that we know how to properly engage in discussions with you?

I think it is not only a proper word count but specific words need to be used.

I think the acceptable response needs to be, "You are absolutely right, Shunyadragon"

[shunyadragon]

I think it is not only a proper word count but specific words need to be used.

I think the acceptable response needs to be, "You are absolutely right, Shunyadragon"

I am never absolutely right, but I do cite scientists to support my case.

[shunyadragon]

So i do a detailed, point-by-point discussion of issues, and he dismisses that as too verbose.

Cow Poke does a short, cogent comment, and that gets dismissed as a lack of coherent response.

Why don't you just give us a word count of what you'd deem acceptable so that we know how to properly engage in discussions with you?

No word count forth coming. You are ignoring the fundamental original argument problem concerning his accusation concerning the fallacy and his logic behind it, and his agenda concerning science.

You did not answer the question: How many scientists do you need to qualify for a general consensus doncerning th epresent view o the origins o our universe based on the evidence o Quantum Mechanics?

Still waiting . . .