Originally posted by Teallaura
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Natural Science 301 Guidelines
This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
THE thread for climate skeptics.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sea of red View PostSo you're actually open to listening to the physical evidence?
I will get back to reading those links because I said I would. I don't have time right now because I have other commitments and real life is really hectic. And when Leo's better and gets back to me, that's probably where it will head, knowing him."He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." - Jim Elliot
"Forgiveness is the way of love." Gary Chapman
My Personal Blog
My Novella blog (Current Novella Begins on 7/25/14)
Quill Sword
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carrikature View PostAgain, no one is saying it should be considered a point of evidence. Nothing has changed on that front.
*arguing in the formal, not the confrontational, senseLast edited by Teallaura; 09-26-2016, 08:02 PM."He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." - Jim Elliot
"Forgiveness is the way of love." Gary Chapman
My Personal Blog
My Novella blog (Current Novella Begins on 7/25/14)
Quill Sword
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post. . . independent of public opinion, politics, and religion.
NOT!"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." - Jim Elliot
"Forgiveness is the way of love." Gary Chapman
My Personal Blog
My Novella blog (Current Novella Begins on 7/25/14)
Quill Sword
Comment
-
Originally posted by Teallaura View PostReally? 'Cause it was a proponent that threw that one out and it looks like that's what Lurch was just arguing in brief*.Last edited by shunyadragon; 09-26-2016, 09:50 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Teallaura View PostAlways was - for a bunch of smart guys, you do some dumb things. You here being general - Nat Sci has never been known for its collective ability to keep an argument straight.
I will get back to reading those links because I said I would. I don't have time right now because I have other commitments and real life is really hectic. And when Leo's better and gets back to me, that's probably where it will head, knowing him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sea of red View PostYou can do it somewhere else. Do not come back to this thread.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sea of red View PostYou can do it somewhere else. Do not come back to this thread.
JimLast edited by oxmixmudd; 09-27-2016, 07:22 AM.My brethren, do not hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with an attitude of personal favoritism. James 2:1
If anyone thinks himself to be religious, and yet does not bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this man’s religion is worthless James 1:26
This you know, my beloved brethren. But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger; James 1:19
Comment
-
Originally posted by oxmixmudd View PostWhy? From my perspective she's pretty tame in the grand scheme of things relative to discussions in this forum. Why not give her a chance to look over the links and come back and discuss their content?"Any sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from trolling."
Comment
-
I can't go into detail about why I removed her from the thread. If I do, she'll have the right to keep posting responses.
All I'll say is that I've been on here long enough (eight years) to know a train-wreck when I see one coming. She was discussing politics and I let her go on about it for pages - showing far more patience than I usually do. Several people here tried to steer her back on topic and she just kept making things political. Not only that, she was acting rude towards several of us, and her last shot at myself and Shunny was the last straw. I could see what it was going to degenerate to in a page or so, and that's the reason for my request.
I normally don't do this but then again, Tweb is usually dysfunctional. If I get an opportunity to keep one of my threads more productive by removing unproductive people, then I'll use that right when I need to. Teal was NOT going to focus on the science. She just wanted to play politics. Sorry, this is a science forum - discuss science. I'm not trying to be some dictator but at a certain point you should realize what sub-forum you're in.
So lets get back to discussing the science, shall we?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sea of red View PostYou can do it somewhere else. Do not come back to this thread.
Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sea of red View PostI can't go into detail about why I removed her from the thread. If I do, she'll have the right to keep posting responses.
All I'll say is that I've been on here long enough (eight years) to know a train-wreck when I see one coming. She was discussing politics and I let her go on about it for pages - showing far more patience than I usually do. Several people here tried to steer her back on topic and she just kept making things political. Not only that, she was acting rude towards several of us, and her last shot at myself and Shunny was the last straw. I could see what it was going to degenerate to in a page or so, and that's the reason for my request.
I normally don't do this but then again, Tweb is usually dysfunctional. If I get an opportunity to keep one of my threads more productive by removing unproductive people, then I'll use that right when I need to. Teal was NOT going to focus on the science. She just wanted to play politics. Sorry, this is a science forum - discuss science. I'm not trying to be some dictator but at a certain point you should realize what sub-forum you're in.
So lets get back to discussing the science, shall we?
I think you are nitpicking, frankly. And you don't want to hear dissenting voices.
Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mossrose View PostDo, you actually don't want opinions from those who disagree with your opinions? What's the point of this thread then?
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostTeallaura did not bring up legitimate scientific objections to thread, which was the purpose of the thread. She presented personal anecdotal experiences of incidents of 'weather,' problems of public opinion and perception of the public of science. Towards the end she resorted to name calling, and this is disruptive to the thread. If you can cite one post where she addresses specific scientific issues, please do.
And stating my opinion on that in the process.
Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by shunyadragon, 05-28-2024, 01:19 PM
|
18 responses
105 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by shunyadragon
05-30-2024, 05:13 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 05-03-2024, 12:33 PM
|
9 responses
99 views
2 likes
|
Last Post 05-27-2024, 05:48 AM |
Comment