Announcement

Collapse

Study Room Guidelines

Ok it isn't so quiet in here but our resident librarian will ensure that there is good discussion on literature, prose, poetry, etc. You may also post sermons, notes, and the like as long as it is not copyrighted material and within reason of the post length regulation.

We encourage you to take a lose look at the threads and offer honest and useful input. This forum is a place where we discuss literature of any media, as well as personal creations by some of our own wordsmiths. Debate is encouraged, but we often find ourselves relaxing here.

Forum Rules: here
See more
See less

Is ASCII Code relevant for Apocalypse 13:18? I think so

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
    I'm an IT professional - I KNOW what ASCII is - and you're showing your ignorance by calling it the "ASCII code", because that translates to the American Standard Code for Information Interchange code. That's redundant.

    What, exactly, do you expect to find by forcing ASCII onto Scripture?
    ASCII "Code" is redundant, ok. But still actually used, since one speaks of other "codes" (Morse and some more).

    Forcing it onto Scripture? I don't see any forcing being done. If St John on Patmos received a genuine prophecy, it can have involved for him genuine foreknowledge of ASCII.

    It is for instance telling that he and his disciples were not being precise about it being "Greek gematria" or "Hebrew gematria", which could have happened if he had been talking just from things commonly known back then.
    http://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.fr/p/apologetics-section.html

    Thanks, Sparko, for telling how I add the link here!

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View Post
      Austria and Russia weren't pagan in 1918.
      They were Christian societies, ya doofus.
      Problem is, the Church Fathers didn't say "after Pagan Rome". They said "after Rome".

      And Austria and Russia were representing Christian Rome up to WW-I.
      http://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.fr/p/apologetics-section.html

      Thanks, Sparko, for telling how I add the link here!

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by hansgeorg View Post
        Problem is, the Church Fathers didn't say "after Pagan Rome". They said "after Rome".

        And Austria and Russia were representing Christian Rome up to WW-I.
        Why do you think that? Because it fits your ideas, so it must be so?

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
          Can you please numerologize doofus so he grasps the concept?
          d 68 060 8
          o 79 130 17
          o 79 200 26
          f 70 270 26
          u 85 350 31
          s 83 430 34 464

          464
          192
          656

          Not too bad!
          http://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.fr/p/apologetics-section.html

          Thanks, Sparko, for telling how I add the link here!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
            I'm an IT professional - I KNOW what ASCII is - and you're showing your ignorance by calling it the "ASCII code", because that translates to the American Standard Code for Information Interchange code. That's redundant.

            What, exactly, do you expect to find by forcing ASCII onto Scripture?
            Want to bet he also says ATM machine (Automatic Teller Machine machine)?

            I'm always still in trouble again

            "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
            "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
            "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by hansgeorg View Post
              Problem is, the Church Fathers didn't say "after Pagan Rome". They said "after Rome".

              And Austria and Russia were representing Christian Rome up to WW-I.
              Um, Russia is Eastern Orthodox.

              I'm always still in trouble again

              "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
              "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
              "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                Yes, an expert on redundancy!
                An expert specialist on repetitive redundancy

                I'm always still in trouble again

                "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                  Want to bet he also says ATM machine (Automatic Teller Machine machine)?
                  The ones you have to use a PIN number on?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                    Why do you think that? Because it fits your ideas, so it must be so?
                    Why I think the Church Fathers were not saying "Pagan Rome"?

                    Look at the quotes!

                    Austria and Russia representing Christian Rome?

                    Rome was divided into West and East.

                    Western power was legitimately accepted by Franks, who in 800 received the Imperial dignity from the Pope, because the Eastern "Emperor" Irene (Empress was only said of Queens consort, not of ruling ones in Byzantium) was acting as a Barbarian (even if she was a saint) in sentencing her son to be blinded, because he was an iconoclast.

                    Charlemagne's Empire was divided, Imperial dignity went East within the West, that is to the part called among other things Germany, known as Holy Roman Empire of Germanic Nation. This retained the Christian Roman dignity up to 1806, and in successor states, Imperial dignity went to Austria which retained it to 1918.

                    East was temporarily down (from W pov) under Irene, temporarily under Latin rule, but more or less functioning to 1453. After that its role was assumed by the former Grand Dukes, now Czars of Russia. Up to "october" (Julian calendar!) 1917.

                    So, Christian Rome lasted till 1918 or 1917 or both years, whichever of Austria and Russia best fits the role of a Christian Rome.
                    http://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.fr/p/apologetics-section.html

                    Thanks, Sparko, for telling how I add the link here!

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                      The ones you have to use a PIN number on?
                      Egg-zactamundo

                      I'm always still in trouble again

                      "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                      "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                      "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                        Um, Russia is Eastern Orthodox.
                        You mean was. When it was so, abortion was really a nono.

                        Now Putin and Kirill claim it is impossible to totally ban abortion in Russia.
                        http://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.fr/p/apologetics-section.html

                        Thanks, Sparko, for telling how I add the link here!

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by hansgeorg View Post
                          Why I think the Church Fathers were not saying "Pagan Rome"?

                          Look at the quotes!
                          St. Augustine of Hippo (345 - 430) Doctor of the Church
                          City of God, Book XX, Chapter 19

                          For what does he [Paul] mean by "For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now holdeth, let him hold until he be taken out of the way: and then shall the wicked be revealed?" [2 Thess 2] I frankly confess I do not know what he means. ... However, it is not absurd to believe that these words of the apostle, "Only he who now holdeth, let him hold until he be taken out of the way," refer to the Roman empire, as if it were said, "Only he who now reigneth, let him reign until he be taken out of the way." "And then shall the wicked be revealed:" no one doubts that this means Antichrist.

                          Source: http://newadvent.org/fathers/120120.htm

                          _____________________________________

                          The testimony is clear, the early church fathers quoted above generally expected the Antichrist to rise to power very soon after the fall of pagan Rome as prophesied in the book of Daniel, chapter 7. At the time that Paul wrote to the church at Thessalonica, the Caesars ruled, and until they were removed they restrained the Antichrist from rising to prominence and exercising his power. This is why Paul could not speak openly about the restrainer in his letter, because he did not want to invite unnecessary persecution by identifying Rome openly and predicting its demise. Pagan Rome's rule ended in 476 A.D., so the above fathers were writing, in some cases, hundreds of years before the event, demonstrating that they understood prophecy, at least on that point.

                          _____________________________________

                          Note that St Augustine says nothing of Rome being "pagan", in his time the Caesars were Catholics (some would say Orthodox), as he was.

                          Note also, when the Czar was taken away, Lenin took his place. When the Austrian Emperor was taken away from Hungary (where he was King), Bela Kun took a place which in years coincides very well with the Antichrist verses of Apocalypse 19.

                          Note also, in post-Czarist Russia, Vladimir Lenin was the first Vladimir, or Vladimir A, Vladimir Putin is the second Vladimir, or Vladimir B.

                          And check out VLADIMIRB, now.
                          http://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.fr/p/apologetics-section.html

                          Thanks, Sparko, for telling how I add the link here!

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                            I can't believe a serious discussion is being had over ASCII - American Standard Code for Information Interchange - numbers to understand Hebrew and Greek.
                            I think hansgeorg is the only one who's taking this discussion seriously.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                              Your full name is not Johann? Hans is short for Johann
                              It's also it's own proper name.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Chrawnus View Post
                                I think hansgeorg is the only one who's taking this discussion seriously.
                                I should hope so.
                                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                                Comment

                                widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
                                Working...
                                X