I am currently sitting in a class on Psychological Safety. Anyone have any experience with these sorts of training? Is there a polite way to call it claptrap?
Announcement
Collapse
Psychology 101 Guidelines
Welcome to Tweb's couch. Please join us in discussing the joys of the human psyche. Watch in wonderment as the Tweb crowd has violent mood swings. help us understand what makes us tick.
Like everywhere else at Tweb our decorum rules apply.
Like everywhere else at Tweb our decorum rules apply.
See more
See less
Psychological Safety
Collapse
X
-
Psychological Safety
That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. DonaldsonTags: None
-
I get the overall premise that no one should feel harassed or abused at work, but I as a supervisor am not responsible for my employees personal happiness. I should be able to deliver an unsatisfactory performance review without fear of damaging their psyche. I shouldn’t be expected to shield employees from discomfort over performance-related issues.That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
- 1 like
Comment
-
From a legal standpoint, there should be a baseline where everybody feels reasonably free from physical threats in the workplace. Anything beyond that runs into subjective territory. Practically speaking, good governance of a workplace will go beyond that (or else you're going to lose good workers), but taking it to the level suggested here is too far.
Edit: I don't think that the legal line should be only at the physical line. I do think sexual harassment should be illegal in the workplace, for instance. But there is a subjective element in what constitutes that and that has to be acknowledged.Last edited by KingsGambit; 05-27-2024, 09:49 AM."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostFrom a legal standpoint, there should be a baseline where everybody feels reasonably free from physical threats in the workplace. Anything beyond that runs into subjective territory. Practically speaking, good governance of a workplace will go beyond that (or else you're going to lose good workers), but taking it to the level suggested here is too far.
Edit: I don't think that the legal line should be only at the physical line. I do think sexual harassment should be illegal in the workplace, for instance. But there is a subjective element in what constitutes that and that has to be acknowledged.
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
- 2 likes
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Bill the Cat, 05-20-2024, 01:15 PM
|
7 responses
64 views
0 likes
|
Last Post 05-27-2024, 01:25 PM | ||
Started by NorrinRadd, 05-04-2024, 03:27 PM
|
41 responses
309 views
1 like
|
Last Post 05-15-2024, 12:27 PM |
Comment