There is a study that is going to be done on Chloroquine which likely will fail to show benefits.
Here is some of the description
The reason that i would expect this to fail first is because it involves the Gates Foundation. (If I had not known about the trouble caused by Gates in India and Africa, I would not have had reason to be concerned about Gates' involvement here.)
The more specific reason is that the effective treatment of COVID-19 seems to rely on the use of Chloroquine type medicines along with large doses of Zinc. This study omits the Zinc.
As I heard it, the Chloroquine opens a pathway for zinc to enter into the cells. It is the zinc within the cells that actually provides the healing. I am wondering if the omission of Zinc would mean that destruction of the cell would happen without having the healing benefit of zinc -- so the cells themselves may end up being messed up.
Also, this may only be useful for people that show the adverse signs of the virus. However, the study omits testing or treatment of people with severe respiratory problems or with paradoxical low blood O2 saturation without any lung damage. The problem with the use of ventilators seemed to be where people's lungs were okay but their O2 saturation was below 90%. In that case, the problem may be in the blood itself rather than in the lungs.
Additionally, the PCR test may not be sufficiently distinguish SARS-CoV-2 from similar, more common, viruses. Thus, again, the Chloroquine may have a false failure on this basis as well.
This is at least how I can fit the different pieces together while having only a peripheral study of respiratory care.
Here is some of the description
The reason that i would expect this to fail first is because it involves the Gates Foundation. (If I had not known about the trouble caused by Gates in India and Africa, I would not have had reason to be concerned about Gates' involvement here.)
The more specific reason is that the effective treatment of COVID-19 seems to rely on the use of Chloroquine type medicines along with large doses of Zinc. This study omits the Zinc.
As I heard it, the Chloroquine opens a pathway for zinc to enter into the cells. It is the zinc within the cells that actually provides the healing. I am wondering if the omission of Zinc would mean that destruction of the cell would happen without having the healing benefit of zinc -- so the cells themselves may end up being messed up.
Also, this may only be useful for people that show the adverse signs of the virus. However, the study omits testing or treatment of people with severe respiratory problems or with paradoxical low blood O2 saturation without any lung damage. The problem with the use of ventilators seemed to be where people's lungs were okay but their O2 saturation was below 90%. In that case, the problem may be in the blood itself rather than in the lungs.
Additionally, the PCR test may not be sufficiently distinguish SARS-CoV-2 from similar, more common, viruses. Thus, again, the Chloroquine may have a false failure on this basis as well.
This is at least how I can fit the different pieces together while having only a peripheral study of respiratory care.
Comment