-
-
Of course sex should be reserved for marriage, but it's untrue to represent that women desire sex less than men. They're just better able to divert that desire into other things than men are. Also, where does the Bible say that we should treat women as "princesses?" We are commanded to love our wives as Christ loves the church, but He disciplines the church unto death. Wives are commanded to submit to their husbands, which means treating them as "lords" and "princes", not vice versa. Feminism is destroying Western civilization. -
Well, I think this is the first time AP has ever been called a feminist."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard RavenhillComment
-
Look into red pill thinking. He's spouting classic blue pill nonsense about women being "princesses." Isaiah devotes an entire chapter to the worthlessness of modern day women.Comment
-
I'm familiar with "red pill thinking", and it's about as compatible with Christianity as Mormonism is. It's generally given as a way to engage in fornication so your purported concern for sexual morality is odd."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard RavenhillComment
-
You answered your implied question with your usage of "generally." One can be a Christian and swallow the red pill that women are out for themselves even more often than men are. It was Eve that was deceived, not Adam.Comment
-
What is this 'princess' Disney talk??Remember that you are dust and to dust you shall return.Comment
-
If anybody is unfamiliar with the red pill movement, here is a decent overview from a Christian writer:
https://www.charismamag.com/blogs/fi...w-the-red-pill
I agree the mindset is utterly incompatible with Paul's instructions in Ephesians."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard RavenhillComment
-
In the example given, the woman left her husband because she was "afraid" of physical abuse. Haha. I'm afraid my wife will cheat on me, so I'm leaving her. Oh, that excuse only works one way? Gosh darn it!Originally posted by KingsGambit View Post
What the article really means is that this woman and her husband were "happily married" with her telling him what to do and how to do it until he decided to man up and demand the respect due him from his wife. Cue "fears of abuse" and abandonment of the marriage so she can find a new blue-pilled beta provider.Comment
-
-
Most of 'red pill' stuff is bad for teaching men to be slutty like female sluts and fornicate around, yes. Overview you link is crap though!!!Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostRemember that you are dust and to dust you shall return.Comment
-
Just five minutes ago you blasted me for not explaining a position of mine well enough for your liking, but here you're content to dismiss an article I post as "crap" with no further explanation?Originally posted by demi-conservative View Post
"I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard RavenhillComment
-
Maybe you need to see quack, tell him where on doll demi touched.Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostJust five minutes ago you blasted me for not explaining a position of mine well enough for your liking, but here you're content to dismiss an article I post as "crap" with no further explanation?
Otherwise, if you want explanation, just ask!!! Same for everyone who wants explanation from me.
--------
It's crap
1) emotional hook one-sided starting story
2) no good explanation why 'red pill movement' believes what they do
3) no good summary of beliefs of theirs, just pick and pieces bits to outrage readers
With 2), also 3), how is summary anywhere close to good? It's not summary that tries to do proper explanation, just supposed to scare/turn off readers from target.Remember that you are dust and to dust you shall return.Comment
-
Sorry KG, but I kind of disagree with you here. Red Pill thinking can be used wrongly and/or abused just like many other things. Take alcohol, used properly, and in moderation, there is (IMO) nothing wrong with the occasional nip. So too, Red Pill thinking can be taken to extremes, and abused, usually by those who simply do not actually understand the underlying principles. The foundation of RP is actually very biblical. The man in the article "Zach" obviously did not even understand the foundation. True RP thinking understands that leadership of the house is (and should be) earned, not conferred, and that many or most women prefer the husband to do the heavy lifting in terms of leadership, and feel much more secure and loved when their Husband does this. To go a little deeper, there's "good" alpha and "bad" alpha. Zach was using pretty exclusively bad alpha, and by that actually lost his wife's respect. Bad alpha isn't true RP thinking no matter how much those that employ it wish it to be.Originally posted by KingsGambit View Post"What has the Church gained if it is popular, but there is no conviction, no repentance, no power?" - A.W. Tozer
"... there are two parties in Washington, the stupid party and the evil party, who occasionally get together and do something both stupid and evil, and this is called bipartisanship." - Everett DirksenComment
-
seems a bit dishonest to call that an overviewOriginally posted by KingsGambit View Post"As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:12
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.Comment
- Lost your password? Questions? Email admin @ theologyweb.com
Tweet
Comment