Announcement

Collapse

Deeper Waters Forum Guidelines

See more
See less

Book Plunge: Jesus's Resurrection in Early Christian Memory

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Book Plunge: Jesus's Resurrection in Early Christian Memory

    Got it memorized?

    --------------

    What do I think of David Graieg’s dissertation? Let’s plunge into the Deeper Waters and find out.

    As far as I know, this isn’t published yet nor is there an official name, but the title i have put is something found in the heading of the dissertation. I saw on Facebook that Graieg had done his dissertation on the resurrection from a perspective of memory and I asked if I could see it. He sent it to me and I did tell him I would write a review.

    I have now finished it and for my thoughts, well, it’s certainly thorough. If you go through a dissertation, pretty much everything has to be backed, save for when you’re doing your conclusion on the matter, and the bibliography makes up about a third of the writing itself. This would be something for many of our atheist friends to keep in mind who think we just blindly believe matters about religion.

    The emphasis in this paper is on the creed in 1 Corinthians 15 and the memory of Jesus’s resurrection event. As we know, the letter was written between 55-60 AD, but the creed comes much earlier. Most scholars will place it no more than five years after the event in question. Most place it at a very early timeframe. Some have placed it within a few months of the event.

    Yet the earliest record we have of it is this letter. Perhaps somehow matters changed. Can we be sure that this is accurate? We have Paul’s word on it, but can we trust his memory stood the test of time? Doesn’t memory change? We’ve all experienced remembering something that didn’t happen or filling in details or telling a story and have it change based on the audience.

    This is the basis of Graieg’s work. Early on, he has a look at the chapter as a whole exegeting it. I thought this was interesting, but if there was one part of the dissertation I didn’t see fitting in, it was this part. I could understand some parts like the idea of a spiritual body being worthy of discussion, but not the entirety of the chapter as a whole. It was unclear to me how this related to memory studies.

    However, from there, nearly every question that can be asked about memory is asked. This includes how memories are shared and how they last and flashbulb memories and what kinds of memories fade. One concern of people who haven’t read this might be that this could be seen from an individual basis. Nope. Graieg spends time looking at the aspects of communal sharing and notes that this would be a communal memory that would be not just shared, but rather performed, several times.

    Such factors even as Paul’s age is looked at. We don’t have a biography of Paul, but Graieg goes on the best information we have and he sees no reason to think that Paul would have his memory sufficiently altered to make the creed radically different from what it was originally. Like I said, it’s very in-depth.

    This also includes look at how reliable testimony is. Hasn’t eyewitness testimony been called into question a few times? Graieg looks at the ways in which memory is reliable in these situations and in the ways in which it is more prone to error.

    In the end, Graieg concludes that there is no reason to believe that there is an error in memory taking place sufficient to overcome that Paul really believed this event happened. That does not mean that it did, but it does mean critics of the resurrection need to be careful before making such an argument. They also need to contend with the evidence and realize perhaps Paul really remembers what happened because it really did happen.

    If there was one other area though I would like to have seen covered, it would have been cognitive dissonance. This is a favorite magic word of skeptics who have never ever read anything on the topic, but it is thrown out to make it look like they know what they’re talking about. I consider it a weak objection, but I would have liked to have seen Graieg talk about it.

    Keep an eye out for this author. If you’re interested in resurrection studies, this is worth it.

    In Christ,
    Nick Peters
    (And I affirm the virgin birth)
    What do I think of David Graieg’s dissertation? Let’s plunge into the Deeper Waters and find out. As far as I know, this isn’t published yet nor is there an official name, but the title i have put is something found in the heading of the dissertation. I saw on Facebook that Graieg had done … Continue reading Book Plunge: Jesus’s Resurrection in Early Christian Memory

  • #2
    Been discussing that in Apologetics recently. What is fascinating is just how widely accepted it is that the creed comes from within five years after the Crucifixion and Resurrection. And that's all across the ideological / theological spectrum -- from conservative evangelicals, liberal Christians, agnostics, non-Christians and atheists.

    I'm always still in trouble again

    "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
    "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
    "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

    Comment


    • #3
      Why does it not mention Jesus appearing to the women?
      If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Apologiaphoenix View Post
        Got it memorized?

        --------------

        What do I think of David Graieg’s dissertation? Let’s plunge into the Deeper Waters and find out.

        As far as I know, this isn’t published yet nor is there an official name, but the title i have put is something found in the heading of the dissertation. I saw on Facebook that Graieg had done his dissertation on the resurrection from a perspective of memory and I asked if I could see it. He sent it to me and I did tell him I would write a review.

        I have now finished it and for my thoughts, well, it’s certainly thorough. If you go through a dissertation, pretty much everything has to be backed, save for when you’re doing your conclusion on the matter, and the bibliography makes up about a third of the writing itself. This would be something for many of our atheist friends to keep in mind who think we just blindly believe matters about religion.

        The emphasis in this paper is on the creed in 1 Corinthians 15 and the memory of Jesus’s resurrection event. As we know, the letter was written between 55-60 AD, but the creed comes much earlier. Most scholars will place it no more than five years after the event in question. Most place it at a very early timeframe. Some have placed it within a few months of the event.

        Yet the earliest record we have of it is this letter. Perhaps somehow matters changed. Can we be sure that this is accurate? We have Paul’s word on it, but can we trust his memory stood the test of time? Doesn’t memory change? We’ve all experienced remembering something that didn’t happen or filling in details or telling a story and have it change based on the audience.

        This is the basis of Graieg’s work. Early on, he has a look at the chapter as a whole exegeting it. I thought this was interesting, but if there was one part of the dissertation I didn’t see fitting in, it was this part. I could understand some parts like the idea of a spiritual body being worthy of discussion, but not the entirety of the chapter as a whole. It was unclear to me how this related to memory studies.

        However, from there, nearly every question that can be asked about memory is asked. This includes how memories are shared and how they last and flashbulb memories and what kinds of memories fade. One concern of people who haven’t read this might be that this could be seen from an individual basis. Nope. Graieg spends time looking at the aspects of communal sharing and notes that this would be a communal memory that would be not just shared, but rather performed, several times.

        Such factors even as Paul’s age is looked at. We don’t have a biography of Paul, but Graieg goes on the best information we have and he sees no reason to think that Paul would have his memory sufficiently altered to make the creed radically different from what it was originally. Like I said, it’s very in-depth.

        This also includes look at how reliable testimony is. Hasn’t eyewitness testimony been called into question a few times? Graieg looks at the ways in which memory is reliable in these situations and in the ways in which it is more prone to error.

        In the end, Graieg concludes that there is no reason to believe that there is an error in memory taking place sufficient to overcome that Paul really believed this event happened. That does not mean that it did, but it does mean critics of the resurrection need to be careful before making such an argument. They also need to contend with the evidence and realize perhaps Paul really remembers what happened because it really did happen.

        If there was one other area though I would like to have seen covered, it would have been cognitive dissonance. This is a favorite magic word of skeptics who have never ever read anything on the topic, but it is thrown out to make it look like they know what they’re talking about. I consider it a weak objection, but I would have liked to have seen Graieg talk about it.

        Keep an eye out for this author. If you’re interested in resurrection studies, this is worth it.

        In Christ,
        Nick Peters
        (And I affirm the virgin birth)
        "Got it memorized" has been burned into my brain. I will never not think of Axel/Lea immediately when I see or hear that phrase.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Cerebrum123 View Post

          "Got it memorized" has been burned into my brain. I will never not think of Axel/Lea immediately when I see or hear that phrase.
          Which is why I used it.

          Comment


          • #6
            The title appears to be Jesus' Resurrection in Early Christian Memory: The Implications of Memory Theory for Understanding Jesus' Resurrection in First Corinthians (listed as 2002) but I don't see any links to it

            I'm always still in trouble again

            "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
            "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
            "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
              The title appears to be Jesus' Resurrection in Early Christian Memory: The Implications of Memory Theory for Understanding Jesus' Resurrection in First Corinthians (listed as 2002) but I don't see any links to it
              I was sent a PDF. Could still be unpublished

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                The title appears to be Jesus' Resurrection in Early Christian Memory: The Implications of Memory Theory for Understanding Jesus' Resurrection in First Corinthians (listed as 2002) but I don't see any links to it
                That should be 2022 not 2002.

                I'm always still in trouble again

                "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Apologiaphoenix View Post

                  Which is why I used it.
                  I figured it had to be a reference to that, but I also figured some here might not get it.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Cerebrum123 View Post

                    I figured it had to be a reference to that, but I also figured some here might not get it.
                    You would be correct.

                    I'm always still in trouble again

                    "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                    "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                    "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                    Comment

                    Related Threads

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by Apologiaphoenix, 05-06-2024, 04:30 PM
                    10 responses
                    62 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post JimL
                    by JimL
                     
                    Started by Apologiaphoenix, 05-01-2024, 09:43 PM
                    3 responses
                    45 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
                    Started by Apologiaphoenix, 04-25-2024, 09:42 AM
                    0 responses
                    11 views
                    1 like
                    Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
                    Started by Apologiaphoenix, 04-15-2024, 09:22 PM
                    0 responses
                    18 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
                    Started by Apologiaphoenix, 04-09-2024, 09:39 AM
                    28 responses
                    206 views
                    1 like
                    Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
                    Working...
                    X