Originally posted by Boxing Pythagoras
View Post
You are presupposing two things : that locations have been identified, and that locations have had their earliest existence dated.
For Pi-Atum, which Hebrew would hardly give directly, since direct rendering includes an idol name, there may have been some confusion about what locality it is, another one can have born it earlier than the one you refer to, or it can have changed name.
As for Ramesses, as well as for possibly correctly indetified Pi-Atum, Ramesses seems to be well identified.
I'd like to know on what grounds Ramesses is said to have not existed in 1510 (alias 1700's) BC. Some have said Rome didn't exist in 752 BC, I think they are looking for the wrong thing when saying so.
Originally posted by Boxing Pythagoras
View Post
Originally posted by Boxing Pythagoras
View Post
I have myself written a theory that the myth of Bacchus starts out as a slander on Moses and Exodus from Egyptian perspective and is then demoted.
Comment