Announcement

Collapse

Unorthodox Theology 201 Guidelines

Theists only.

This forum area is primarily for persons who would identify themselves as Christians whether or not their theology is recognized within the mainstream or as orthodox though other theists may participate with moderator permission. Therefore those that would be restricted from posting in Christianity 201 due to a disagreement with the enumerated doctrines, ie the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment may freely post here on any theological subject matter. In this case "unorthodox" is used in the strict sense of a person who denies what has been declared as universal essentials of the historic Christian faith. Examples would be adherents to Oneness, Full Preterists, Unitarian Universalist Christians, Gnostics, Liberal Christianity, Christian Science to name a few.

The second purpose will be for threads on subjects, which although the thread starter has no issue with the above doctrines, the subject matter is so very outside the bounds of normative Christian doctrine totally within the leadership's discretion that it is placed here. In so doing, no judgment or offense is intended to be placed on the belief of said person in the above-doctrines. In this case "unorthodox" is used in a much looser sense of "outside the norms" - Examples of such threads would be pro-polygamy, pro-drug use, proponents of gay Christian churches, proponents of abortion.

The third purpose is for persons who wish to have input from any and all who would claim the title of Christian even on subjects that would be considered "orthodox."

The philosophy behind this area was to recognize that there are persons who would identify themselves as Christian and thus seem out of place in the Comparative Religions Forum, but yet in keeping with our committment here to certain basic core Christian doctrines. Also, it allows threads to be started by those who would want to still be identified as Christian with a particular belief that while not denying an essential is of such a nature that the discussion on that issue belongs in this section or for threads by persons who wish such a non-restricted discussion.


Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

New Heaven & Earth

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New Heaven & Earth

    I was once asked, in this forum, about the elect being kings in the kingdom of God. If the elect are kings, don't they have subjects? It would seem ridiculous to consider an elect a king, and yet would not have subjects, right?


    Jesus himself implied that the elect person will receive to rule, or govern. (see the parable of talents) (Matt 25:14-30)


    Likewise, priests have their congregations. They the lead or govern their congregation.


    What I used to believed is that those who are called elect, are the only ones to be saved. I came to understand this as a big error.


    I came to understand that those elected to be kings and priests, are not the only ones to be saved, but rather they merely represent those who are favored amongst the saved. Those who are called to enter the kingdom of heaven are not the only ones to be saved, rather that they are the ones elected to be rulers/kings and priests in the whole kingdom of God.


    God established heaven and earth in Israel (Isaiah 51:16), but it is only the tribe of Judah is considered the heavenly one, the mount Zion (Psalms 78:68). Amongst the twelve tribes, Judah is the one promised to have the kingship and the promised of superior priesthood, not the Levitical priesthood. The remaining eleven tribes are then considered as congregations, or the subjects, of Judah; the eleven tribes represent the earth.




    A LESSON FROM THE LAW


    In the Mosaic law, only the tribe of Levi is the one that has the authority to be priests. Yet, when God promised to Israel, the whole nation will be a nation of priests unto God (Lev 19:5-6). Here, in this promise of God, it would seem clear that the priesthood being promised is not about the Levitical priesthood; because amongst all Israel only the tribe of Levi are called to be priests. So when God spoke of the nation that will be a kingdom of priests, it does not represent the nation of Israel, neither it speaks of the tribe of Levi. But rather the promised priesthood fell unto Jesus, of the tribe of Judah, which tribe has no part of the Levitical priesthood (Hebrews 7:11-18). The point I am making in this is that of the whole nation chosen by God to be his kingdom, which represents those saved, only the tribe of Judah was the one given a more favorable promises. They are the ones who will be kings and priests, or which represent the heaven, a more glorious stature, than the earth. So when we speak of the people whom God will saved, we should not mistake of only referring to those who will be in the kingdom of heaven, or those who will be kings and priests, but also of those who will be subjects and congregants of the kings and priests.


    What makes this important to understand is because God will create a New Heaven & Earth(Isa 65:17), and that this New Heaven & Earth will resemble that of Israel as described in Isaiah 51:16. And for those who would hope of the promises of God, we should expect this New Heaven & Earth to come; as it is even prophesied that the whole earth will be a kingdom of Christ and God (Rev 11:15).



    Matthew 6:33
    But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
    ...WISDOM giveth life to them that have it. (Ecclesiastes 7:12)
    ...the ISLES shall wait for his law (Isaiah 42:4)
    https://philippinesinprophecies.wordpress.com/

  • #2
    Greetings FarEastBird,

    I was interested in your suggestion, but I believe the faithful of this present era will be kings and priests to the mortal inhabitants of the earth who survive the judgements of God when Jesus returns to sit upon the throne of David in Jerusalem for the 1000 years.
    Isaiah 2:1-4 (KJV): 1 The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem. 2 And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORDíS house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. 3 And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. 4 And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.

    Kind regards
    Trevor

    Comment


    • #3
      I've come to think that the language of the Bible - Kings, Princes, kingdoms, etc. - was indicative of the human origin of the stories therein.

      Curious that a book of prophecy would not foresee a future where kings and kingdoms would give way to democracy and market systems, rather than freeze-drying humanity in barbaric, unjust feudalism.

      NORM
      When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said 'Let us pray.' We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land. - Bishop Desmond Tutu

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by NormATive View Post
        I've come to think that the language of the Bible - Kings, Princes, kingdoms, etc. - was indicative of the human origin of the stories therein.

        Curious that a book of prophecy would not foresee a future where kings and kingdoms would give way to democracy and market systems, rather than freeze-drying humanity in barbaric, unjust feudalism.

        NORM
        As if they'd know what a republican democracy was, mr anachronism. Then you'd have people back then arguing about why the NT didn't think Kings were awesome. If you read some of the parables, having a high government position would be based on how well you acted here(so, a meritocracy).
        If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!

        Comment

        widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
        Working...
        X