Announcement

Collapse

Unorthodox Theology 201 Guidelines

Theists only.

This forum area is primarily for persons who would identify themselves as Christians whether or not their theology is recognized within the mainstream or as orthodox though other theists may participate with moderator permission. Therefore those that would be restricted from posting in Christianity 201 due to a disagreement with the enumerated doctrines, ie the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment may freely post here on any theological subject matter. In this case "unorthodox" is used in the strict sense of a person who denies what has been declared as universal essentials of the historic Christian faith. Examples would be adherents to Oneness, Full Preterists, Unitarian Universalist Christians, Gnostics, Liberal Christianity, Christian Science to name a few.

The second purpose will be for threads on subjects, which although the thread starter has no issue with the above doctrines, the subject matter is so very outside the bounds of normative Christian doctrine totally within the leadership's discretion that it is placed here. In so doing, no judgment or offense is intended to be placed on the belief of said person in the above-doctrines. In this case "unorthodox" is used in a much looser sense of "outside the norms" - Examples of such threads would be pro-polygamy, pro-drug use, proponents of gay Christian churches, proponents of abortion.

The third purpose is for persons who wish to have input from any and all who would claim the title of Christian even on subjects that would be considered "orthodox."

The philosophy behind this area was to recognize that there are persons who would identify themselves as Christian and thus seem out of place in the Comparative Religions Forum, but yet in keeping with our committment here to certain basic core Christian doctrines. Also, it allows threads to be started by those who would want to still be identified as Christian with a particular belief that while not denying an essential is of such a nature that the discussion on that issue belongs in this section or for threads by persons who wish such a non-restricted discussion.


Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Is the Papacy the Antichrist?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sparko
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • rogue06
    replied
    Originally posted by KingsGambit View Post
    This is one of those "why did we need to resurrect this thread" cases.
    My bad. I left a pack of these on my desk which disappeared (the pack not the desk)


    Leave a comment:


  • KingsGambit
    replied
    This is one of those "why did we need to resurrect this thread" cases.

    Leave a comment:


  • tabibito
    replied
    1 - My assessment is that the beast, and THE antichrist are atheist.

    2 - People often identify themselves as being and doing the things they accuse others of.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rational Gaze
    replied
    The anti-Christ was Nero. Case closed.

    Leave a comment:


  • KingsGambit
    replied
    What definition of "antichrist" are we using? Are we using the general "antichrist" sense like in 1 John 2:22 where anyone who denies Jesus is God is the antichrist? Or the sense of the final Antichrist?

    If the former, that doesn't work because the Pope doesn't deny that Jesus is God. If the final Antichrist, given that the papacy has been around for so many centuries...

    Leave a comment:


  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Originally posted by Dave L View Post
    The problem is, you assume I'm like you
    WOW --- if THAT isn't a nutty assumption!


    and you accuse me of the same foul motives you would have if you were to do what I do. You only condemn yourself.


    Your hatred betrays your claim to be a follower of Christ. Can't you see this?
    Yeah, I know "I have studied and studied and studied and I have WAY more Bibles than you do, so I'm a WAY better Christian than you!"

    You're gonna be a lot of fun, Brother Dave.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dave L
    replied
    Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post

    I'm really not. I think you're a nut and legalistic knowed-up Pharisee.



    Yeah, I'll stay up all night worrying about that.



    Cool. But you have no right to try to tell me what to do.
    The problem is, you assume I'm like you and you accuse me of the same foul motives you would have if you were to do what I do. You only condemn yourself.
    Your hatred betrays your claim to be a follower of Christ. Can't you see this?
    Last edited by Dave L; 01-10-2022, 05:07 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Originally posted by Dave L View Post

    But you are stalking me to pick fights.
    I'm really not. I think you're a nut and legalistic knowed-up Pharisee.

    I don't look you up.
    Yeah, I'll stay up all night worrying about that.

    I try to avoid you.
    Cool. But you have no right to try to tell me what to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dave L
    replied
    Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post

    Here....




    A) Getting paranoid?
    2) I'll post anywhere I wish within the confines of the board.


    But you are stalking me to pick fights. I don't look you up. I try to avoid you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Originally posted by Dave L View Post
    Where did I say any such thing?
    Here....
    Originally posted by Dave L
    If you believe in free will, you believe more like the Antichrist Catholics than you do Luther and all the Reformed. What can I say?
    Quit stalking me.
    A) Getting paranoid?
    2) I'll post anywhere I wish within the confines of the board.



    Leave a comment:


  • Dave L
    replied
    Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post

    In spite of your nonsensical accusation that I, somehow, support the Pope, I have consistently said that the Pope is not a position I recognize, nor do I believe Peter was, in any way shape or form, the first Pope.
    Where did I say any such thing? Quit stalking me. Be a pro.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Originally posted by Dave L View Post
    One of the most profound statements by the Papacy itself is that the Pope is the Vicar of Christ. Vicar
    In spite of your nonsensical accusation that I, somehow, support the Pope, I have consistently said that the Pope is not a position I recognize, nor do I believe Peter was, in any way shape or form, the first Pope.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dave L
    replied
    One of the most profound statements by the Papacy itself is that the Pope is the Vicar of Christ. Vicar

    Job title

    A vicar is a representative, deputy or substitute; anyone acting "in the person of" or agent for a superior. Linguistically, vicar is cognate with the English prefix "vice", similarly meaning "deputy". Wikipedia

    The word vicar comes from the Latin word vicarius meaning substitution.

    The on-line version of the Pocket Catholic Dictionary by John A. Hardon, S.J. defines the Vicar of Christ as, “The Pope, visible head of the Church on earth, acting for and in the place of Christ. He possesses supreme ecclesiastical authority in the Catholic Church...”

    Antichrist = against or in place of. —ORIGIN Middle English: via Anglo-Norman French from Old French vicaire, from Latin vicarius ‘substitute’, from vic- ‘change, place’ (compare with VICE3).

    Soanes, C., & Stevenson, A., eds. (2004). In Concise Oxford English dictionary (11th ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Originally posted by Dave L View Post

    Strictly original with credit given to quotes. I spent years off and on putting this together.
    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:

Related Threads

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by Larry Serflaten, 01-25-2024, 09:30 AM
432 responses
1,976 views
0 likes
Last Post Sparko
by Sparko
 
Working...
X