Originally posted by Dave L
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Unorthodox Theology 201 Guidelines
Theists only.
This forum area is primarily for persons who would identify themselves as Christians whether or not their theology is recognized within the mainstream or as orthodox though other theists may participate with moderator permission. Therefore those that would be restricted from posting in Christianity 201 due to a disagreement with the enumerated doctrines, ie the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment may freely post here on any theological subject matter. In this case "unorthodox" is used in the strict sense of a person who denies what has been declared as universal essentials of the historic Christian faith. Examples would be adherents to Oneness, Full Preterists, Unitarian Universalist Christians, Gnostics, Liberal Christianity, Christian Science to name a few.
The second purpose will be for threads on subjects, which although the thread starter has no issue with the above doctrines, the subject matter is so very outside the bounds of normative Christian doctrine totally within the leadership's discretion that it is placed here. In so doing, no judgment or offense is intended to be placed on the belief of said person in the above-doctrines. In this case "unorthodox" is used in a much looser sense of "outside the norms" - Examples of such threads would be pro-polygamy, pro-drug use, proponents of gay Christian churches, proponents of abortion.
The third purpose is for persons who wish to have input from any and all who would claim the title of Christian even on subjects that would be considered "orthodox."
The philosophy behind this area was to recognize that there are persons who would identify themselves as Christian and thus seem out of place in the Comparative Religions Forum, but yet in keeping with our committment here to certain basic core Christian doctrines. Also, it allows threads to be started by those who would want to still be identified as Christian with a particular belief that while not denying an essential is of such a nature that the discussion on that issue belongs in this section or for threads by persons who wish such a non-restricted discussion.
Forum Rules: Here
This forum area is primarily for persons who would identify themselves as Christians whether or not their theology is recognized within the mainstream or as orthodox though other theists may participate with moderator permission. Therefore those that would be restricted from posting in Christianity 201 due to a disagreement with the enumerated doctrines, ie the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment may freely post here on any theological subject matter. In this case "unorthodox" is used in the strict sense of a person who denies what has been declared as universal essentials of the historic Christian faith. Examples would be adherents to Oneness, Full Preterists, Unitarian Universalist Christians, Gnostics, Liberal Christianity, Christian Science to name a few.
The second purpose will be for threads on subjects, which although the thread starter has no issue with the above doctrines, the subject matter is so very outside the bounds of normative Christian doctrine totally within the leadership's discretion that it is placed here. In so doing, no judgment or offense is intended to be placed on the belief of said person in the above-doctrines. In this case "unorthodox" is used in a much looser sense of "outside the norms" - Examples of such threads would be pro-polygamy, pro-drug use, proponents of gay Christian churches, proponents of abortion.
The third purpose is for persons who wish to have input from any and all who would claim the title of Christian even on subjects that would be considered "orthodox."
The philosophy behind this area was to recognize that there are persons who would identify themselves as Christian and thus seem out of place in the Comparative Religions Forum, but yet in keeping with our committment here to certain basic core Christian doctrines. Also, it allows threads to be started by those who would want to still be identified as Christian with a particular belief that while not denying an essential is of such a nature that the discussion on that issue belongs in this section or for threads by persons who wish such a non-restricted discussion.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Caution in railing against President Biden and others.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Alien View Post
I don't understand. If there was only one murderer in the world, everyone else would be righteous? But, if nobody murdered, nobody would be righteous? And I'm completely lost with "no sin no sovereignty".
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave L View Post
So you hate God if that is your understanding of Him?
We can also make an argument for the lack of free will from a naturalist pov, where each action is totally determined by the state preceding it. I struggled with that for a while, but finally decided that I seem to have free will and that would have to do. The problem with your view (imo) is not whether it has some logic associated with it (if god is all powerful and all knowing he had a choice in how he set up the universe in the first place, where he could determine everything that would follow from that initial setup and thus is responsible for the whole can of worms). There is also (again imo) some scripture that seems to point that way. That's a problem that naturally arises with the idea of a 3-omni god.
The problem as I see it is more with how it makes your god look (as I suggested in the story of the cruel child).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave L View Post
Sin reveals God's attributes. Just as hot reveals cold.
By the way "hot" and "cold" are just relative and totally subjective terms. What we have is temperature, which is "revealed" by a thermometer, among other things.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alien View Post
You said "you cannot know God apart from sin", which suggests that sin is the only way to reveal god's attributes. Sticking with the murder analogy, if god wanted us to know that murder was bad, there seem to be lots of alternative ways to tell us that, rather than to force someone to murder then punish him for it. How about just stating it in scripture. Oops, he did.
By the way "hot" and "cold" are just relative and totally subjective terms. What we have is temperature, which is "revealed" by a thermometer, among other things.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gondwanaland View Post
Yep. I already have issues with the normal Christian deity, but this uber-Calvinist version is particularly disturbing.We know J6 wasn’t peaceful because they didn’t set the building on fire.
Comment
-
Originally posted by alaskazimm View Post
This isn't some far out of left field version of Cavinism, that some would term hyper-Calvinism. No, this is pretty much Calvinism 101 straight from the man himself. All these ideas, as distasteful as they are, can be found in his Institutes of Christian Religion.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
And "cold" is just the absence of heat, as "dark" is the absence of light.
That definition of "cold" would only apply at absolute zero. Otherwise there is always some heat. In typical usage, "cold" actually means "relatively cold". For example, if I say "the A/C is blowing cold air" I really mean colder than the ambient temperature, or colder than my body temperature, or similar.
Sorry, I love to nit pick. You'll get fed up with me eventually.
Do you like my new picture? I like this version of Tweb much better. It used to be that I had to use special software to reduce the number of pixels to fit the frame.Now it's automatic!
Comment
-
Originally posted by alaskazimm View Post
This isn't some far out of left field version of Cavinism, that some would term hyper-Calvinism. No, this is pretty much Calvinism 101 straight from the man himself. All these ideas, as distasteful as they are, can be found in his Institutes of Christian Religion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alien View PostCorrect about "dark".
That definition of "cold" would only apply at absolute zero. Otherwise there is always some heat. In typical usage, "cold" actually means "relatively cold". For example, if I say "the A/C is blowing cold air" I really mean colder than the ambient temperature, or colder than my body temperature, or similar.
Sorry, I love to nit pick. You'll get fed up with me eventually.
Do you like my new picture? I like this version of Tweb much better. It used to be that I had to use special software to reduce the number of pixels to fit the frame.Now it's automatic!
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave L View Post
Jesus says the lost are slaves to Satan. James says you cannot control your tongue. This also disproves free will.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Larry Serflaten, 01-25-2024, 09:30 AM
|
432 responses
1,967 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
04-17-2024, 09:43 AM
|
Comment