In another thread, 7Up resorts to a ploy used by other Mormons when he is incapable of defending his faith. He attempts to hide behind the concept of "sacred" as a justification for personal attacks and false accusations of lying and "not following Christ".
It's one of the SILLIEST and WEAKEST "defenses" I've seen, and relies, apparently, on changing the meaning of the word "sacred".
By declaring his beliefs "sacred", 7up seems to think that any opposition to Mormonism is an attack on his "sacred beliefs" that justifies him pitching a hissy, calling names, and making false accusations. Here's one of his silliest accusations:
First, he declares:
THEN he proceeds to judge:
There were more childish rants in that post and thread, but we'll leave those alone for now.
How does declaring a false teaching "sacred" make it exempt from examination?
I just spent some time going through FairMormon.org, and found numerous examples of hiding behind "sacred" as reasons not to discuss topics like, for example, "Heavenly Mother" (even Fair denounces this as a goofy tactic), the temple endowment and related Masonic-like rituals, and some of the nuttier statements of some of the Mormon false prophets.
The Question.....
On what biblical basis can a person attack a Christian as "not a follower of Christ", a liar, "swine", etc, for opposing false teachings?
It's one of the SILLIEST and WEAKEST "defenses" I've seen, and relies, apparently, on changing the meaning of the word "sacred".
Originally posted by seven7up
View Post
First, he declares:
Originally posted by seven7up
View Post
That is why I suspect you are the kind of person who pulls off the hats of Orthodox Jews, then you pull their hair and tell them how stupid they look with all of their "nonsense". You are a despicable human being, and you don't even realize it.
How does declaring a false teaching "sacred" make it exempt from examination?
I just spent some time going through FairMormon.org, and found numerous examples of hiding behind "sacred" as reasons not to discuss topics like, for example, "Heavenly Mother" (even Fair denounces this as a goofy tactic), the temple endowment and related Masonic-like rituals, and some of the nuttier statements of some of the Mormon false prophets.
The Question.....
On what biblical basis can a person attack a Christian as "not a follower of Christ", a liar, "swine", etc, for opposing false teachings?
Comment