..."and find yourself embedded in purely empty space..."
Right. The space however would be timeless, correct? It would be the blank slate so to speak that all particles and such would fill later on.
At least this is my thinking at the moment.
I've also read that the idea that space is expanding is debatable. If space is timeless and uncaused, then it's not really expanding.
The space is what I personally am interested in at the moment. It is at least a starting place for me to understand something, even if it's all wrong. I'll abandon those ideas later, but for now, what I have in my simulation (my thinking, reasoning, etc), is that space, the area, has always been there, uncaused and Eternal. The space itself is not really doing anything, so it's not a relevant question to even asked what "caused" space.
Right. The space however would be timeless, correct? It would be the blank slate so to speak that all particles and such would fill later on.
At least this is my thinking at the moment.
I've also read that the idea that space is expanding is debatable. If space is timeless and uncaused, then it's not really expanding.
The space is what I personally am interested in at the moment. It is at least a starting place for me to understand something, even if it's all wrong. I'll abandon those ideas later, but for now, what I have in my simulation (my thinking, reasoning, etc), is that space, the area, has always been there, uncaused and Eternal. The space itself is not really doing anything, so it's not a relevant question to even asked what "caused" space.
Comment