Originally posted by Tassman
View Post
Are you being deliberately misleading?
I said multiverse theory "increasingly seems to be the accepted model", not that it was the only model. But, as shunya reminds you, Steinhardt's 'cyclic model' is also described as eternal, which doesn't help your "necessary for creation" scenario one little bit.
I said multiverse theory "increasingly seems to be the accepted model", not that it was the only model. But, as shunya reminds you, Steinhardt's 'cyclic model' is also described as eternal, which doesn't help your "necessary for creation" scenario one little bit.
So that we are clear: inflation is driven by a hypothetical scalar field, the inflation, which has properties that can be adjusted to produce effectively any outcome...No experiment can rule out a theory that allows for all possible outcomes. Hence, the paradigm of inflation is unfalsifiable...
You Tass are willing to believe in a theory i.e. the multiverse theory, that in the end is unfalsifiable. Is that good science Tass? So now do you want to jump on the 'cyclic model' bandwagon?
Comment