Originally posted by seer
View Post
You have NOT responded to the references provided. To avoid miscommunication I changed the wording of the following.
Again . . .
Again my argument was previously stated. "The evidence of the natural objective basis of evolution of morals and ethics, and the rule of law with the survival of the species to maintain cooperation and stability of human cultures." I could care less about moral realism, because it does not explain anything concerning the objective origin of morals, ethics and rule of law.
In other words science has an adequate explanation based on the objective evidence for the evolution of morals, ethics and rule of law. The references provided demonstrate this and you have not responded.
Comment