If we really have no control over our thoughts and acts then what does that do to our sense of personal responsibility and how we look at the world? How could one ethically condemn an ISIS, or the murdering Communists and Nazis of the last century? They had no control over what they did. You could say that you don't prefer what they did, but to bring a moral charge against them would be akin to bringing a moral charge against the junk yard dog that bit you. It is meaningless, irrational.
Announcement
Collapse
Philosophy 201 Guidelines
Cogito ergo sum
Here in the Philosophy forum we will talk about all the "why" questions. We'll have conversations about the way in which philosophy and theology and religion interact with each other. Metaphysics, ontology, origins, truth? They're all fair game so jump right in and have some fun! But remember...play nice!
Forum Rules: Here
Here in the Philosophy forum we will talk about all the "why" questions. We'll have conversations about the way in which philosophy and theology and religion interact with each other. Metaphysics, ontology, origins, truth? They're all fair game so jump right in and have some fun! But remember...play nice!
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Determinism And Moral Responsibility
Collapse
X
-
Determinism And Moral Responsibility
Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3sTags: None
-
Originally posted by seer View PostIf we really have no control over our thoughts and acts then what does that do to our sense of personal responsibility and how we look at the world? How could one ethically condemn an ISIS, or the murdering Communists and Nazis of the last century? They had no control over what they did. You could say that you don't prefer what they did, but to bring a moral charge against them would be akin to bringing a moral charge against the junk yard dog that bit you. It is meaningless, irrational.“I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
“And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
“not all there” - you know who you are
-
Originally posted by seer View PostIf we really have no control over our thoughts and acts then what does that do to our sense of personal responsibility and how we look at the world? How could one ethically condemn an ISIS, or the murdering Communists and Nazis of the last century? They had no control over what they did. You could say that you don't prefer what they did, but to bring a moral charge against them would be akin to bringing a moral charge against the junk yard dog that bit you. It is meaningless, irrational.
We have the illusion of being in control of our thoughts and behaviour and act accordingly. And, being a social species, we've evolved with instincts that favour the maintenance of a cohesive community and these instincts form the basis of our moral code. Initially such behaviour was restricted to our own community or tribe but, being the intelligent species we are, we have extrapolated this behaviour to apply to ALL people. At least this is the ideal...there's still a way to go as indicted by the current war-torn state of the world.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by firstfloor View PostIf it appears that you have free will and freedom of action you also appear to be responsible for your actions. That is all that is required for others to appear to hold you to account.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostAnd here we go again.....
We have the illusion of being in control of our thoughts and behaviour and act accordingly. And, being a social species, we've evolved with instincts that favour the maintenance of a cohesive community and these instincts form the basis of our moral code. Initially such behaviour was restricted to our own community or tribe but, being the intelligent species we are, we have extrapolated this behaviour to apply to ALL people. At least this is the ideal...there's still a way to go as indicted by the current war-torn state of the world.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostRight, and here we go again - logically, if determinism is true then assigning moral blame or praise to any act is nonsensical. How could it be otherwise?
Secondly, social creatures such as us have an evolved genetically determined predisposition which favours the maintenance of cohesive communities and from which we develop a moral code. We assign “moral blame” to those who break the rules because they damage the social fabric.
And, unsurprisingly, when we invented our gods we gave them the same attributes and moral sense that we ourselves instinctively hold to be important.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostSecondly, social creatures such as us have an evolved genetically determined predisposition which favours the maintenance of cohesive communities and from which we develop a moral code. We assign “moral blame” to those who break the rules because they damage the social fabric.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostIt does not matter why we assign blame, it is still a legal fiction.
We don't morally blame the junk yard dog for biting. We may put him down, but there is no moral blame. And we are just as determined as that dog.
Oops, ‘amen’ error re your previous post.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostIt's up to the other dogs in the pack to maintain doggy law and order within the pack, just as it’s up to human communities to maintain law and order within the tribe or society. Social creatures such as us have an evolved genetically determined predisposition that favours the maintenance of cohesive communities and from which we develop a moral code. If you think that there’s a logically coherent alternative to the causal determinism that resulted in evolved communities such as ours, then the onus is on you to explain what it is.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostThat is not the point Tass, the point is not about what we do to maintain cohesive communities,
religion can do that.
It is about the idea of moral blame. You can no more assign moral blame to a man than you could for a dog - you may remove the dog or man from society because of their behavior, but neither are morally responsible for their action - both are equally determined, neither has any control over over their actions.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostOf course it is. Maintaining social cohesion is the sole reason for enforcing a code of behavior, what do you think morality is all about…keeping an imaginary deity happy?
Only if everyone conforms to the same sect of the same religion otherwise religion can be very divisive.
We exercise control over our behaviour and are held responsible for it by the community. We’re predisposed by natural selection towards exhibiting altruism, mutual reciprocity and adherence to the rules of the group. It’s instinctive and we assign moral blame to those who do not adhere to the rules of the group.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostRight, and here we go again - logically, if determinism is true then assigning moral blame or praise to any act is nonsensical. How could it be otherwise?Blog: Atheism and the City
If your whole worldview rests on a particular claim being true, you damn well better have evidence for it. You should have tons of evidence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Thinker View PostIt wouldn't necessarily be nonsensical, because praising those who do good encourages good behavior and punishing those who do bad discourages bad behavior. After all, that's what we want to do.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostBut you assume that most men can be good without believing in a deity, and you assume that there is something better for maintaining social cohesion than religion.
What do you mean "we exercise control over our behavior?" That is exactly the point, we don't in your world - we are determined. Does the junk yard dog exercise control over his behavior?Blog: Atheism and the City
If your whole worldview rests on a particular claim being true, you damn well better have evidence for it. You should have tons of evidence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostI'm not speaking of trying to change behavior, I'm speaking of the very idea of personal moral responsibility. The idea that we are in fact responsible for our behavior - we are not, determinism undermines that. We may praise the junk yard dog and do what we can to change him - but he is not responsible for his bad behavior.Blog: Atheism and the City
If your whole worldview rests on a particular claim being true, you damn well better have evidence for it. You should have tons of evidence.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by shunyadragon, 03-01-2024, 09:40 AM
|
161 responses
514 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by shunyadragon
Yesterday, 05:44 PM
|
||
Started by seer, 02-15-2024, 11:24 AM
|
88 responses
354 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by shunyadragon
03-01-2024, 09:27 AM
|
||
Started by Diogenes, 01-22-2024, 07:37 PM
|
21 responses
133 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by shunyadragon
03-25-2024, 10:59 PM
|
Comment