I remember a while back some video on FAs and that they had a term for people who reject their dogma for theism. I know Dawkins or one of his ilk used the term to describe Antony Flew(?) when he left the fold.
Announcement
Collapse
General Theistics 101 Guidelines
This area is open for nontheists and theists to interact on issues of theism and faith in a civilized manner. We ask that nontheist participation respect the theistic views of others and not seek to undermine theism in general, or advocate for nontheism. Such posts are more suited for and allowable in Apologetics 301 with very little restriction.
The moderators of this area are given great discretion to determine if a particular thread or comment would more appropriately belong in another forum area.
Forum Rules: Here
The moderators of this area are given great discretion to determine if a particular thread or comment would more appropriately belong in another forum area.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Term for people who renounce antitheism
Collapse
X
-
Was Flew an antitheist per se?"I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
-
Originally posted by DLAbaoaqu View PostI can't remember that word. It was pretty much the FA equivalent of apostasy.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Manwë Súlimo View PostThey called Flew senile.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
He coherently explained his reasoning for his change of mind; that doesn't indicate senility.
Pat Robertson is more of the type of person you would suspect to be senile because his reasoning tends to be less coherent whenever he makes his patented controversial statements."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostHe coherently explained his reasoning for his change of mind; that doesn't indicate senility.
Pat Robertson is more of the type of person you would suspect to be senile because his reasoning tends to be less coherent whenever he makes his patented controversial statements.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chrawnus View PostI'm not familiar with Pat Robertson, so I just wanted to clarify that my amen was only for the first part about Flew."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chrawnus View PostI think that pretty much explains why I know practically nothing about him.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-15-2023, 05:49 AM
|
119 responses
512 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by tabibito
Yesterday, 06:19 AM
|
||
Started by NorrinRadd, 03-09-2023, 06:46 PM
|
4 responses
26 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
03-10-2023, 07:09 AM
|
Comment