Announcement

Collapse

General Theistics 101 Guidelines

This area is open for nontheists and theists to interact on issues of theism and faith in a civilized manner. We ask that nontheist participation respect the theistic views of others and not seek to undermine theism in general, or advocate for nontheism. Such posts are more suited for and allowable in Apologetics 301 with very little restriction.

The moderators of this area are given great discretion to determine if a particular thread or comment would more appropriately belong in another forum area.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

An atheist chaplain

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Sparko View Post

    Are you sure you are not autistic?
    Do you know what the two respective disciplines of anthropology and comparative religion constitute?
    "It ain't necessarily so
    The things that you're liable
    To read in the Bible
    It ain't necessarily so
    ."

    Sportin' Life
    Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

      I recommend that you read some anthropology.

      The concept that there are two supernatural entities one of the dark and one of the light is dualism.
      I'm quite familiar with the concept. Perhaps you might benefit re-reading mossy's post and this time seek to understand what she actually wrote rather than posting a knee jerk reaction revealing yet again that comprehension issue you have.

      I'm always still in trouble again

      "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
      "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
      "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

        Do you know what the two respective disciplines of anthropology and comparative religion constitute?
        Is that an admission you are autistic? Because you seem to have a very hard time grasping really simple social concepts and interactions.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
          I'm quite familiar with the concept.
          Then why post an inane gif?

          "It ain't necessarily so
          The things that you're liable
          To read in the Bible
          It ain't necessarily so
          ."

          Sportin' Life
          Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Sparko View Post

            Is that an admission you are autistic?
            Is that an admission that you do not know what the two respective disciplines of anthropology and comparative religion constitute?
            "It ain't necessarily so
            The things that you're liable
            To read in the Bible
            It ain't necessarily so
            ."

            Sportin' Life
            Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

              Is that an admission that you do not know what the two respective disciplines of anthropology and comparative religion constitute?
              What does that have to do with you not understanding what mossrose said? All this shows is your lack of understanding of a simple English conversation and thinking pretending to know something scientific is an appropriate response. Which seems like something an autistic person would do. Like someone mentioning what how great a homerun hit was at a baseball game and instead of saying, "wow. yeah!" you started spouting batting averages and the odds of getting a homerun hit.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Sparko View Post

                What does that have to do with you not understanding what mossrose said? All this shows is your lack of understanding of a simple English conversation and thinking pretending to know something scientific is an appropriate response. Which seems like something an autistic person would do. Like someone mentioning what how great a homerun hit was at a baseball game and instead of saying, "wow. yeah!" you started spouting batting averages and the odds of getting a homerun hit.
                This is what mossrose wrote

                "Whatever gods they worship, including themselves, are false. All man created religions are false. There are only 2 religions, the worship of the works of Satan or the worship of the Jesus of the Bible."

                All religions, including your own, are "man created". That is a self-evident fact.

                To suggest there are "only 2 religions the worship of the works of Satan or the worship of the Jesus of the Bible" hints at cosmic dualism. I would also add that such an entrenched viewpoint is somewhat disdainful towards other belief systems and their adherents. We know from history where such opinions have led.
                "It ain't necessarily so
                The things that you're liable
                To read in the Bible
                It ain't necessarily so
                ."

                Sportin' Life
                Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

                  This is what mossrose wrote

                  "Whatever gods they worship, including themselves, are false. All man created religions are false. There are only 2 religions, the worship of the works of Satan or the worship of the Jesus of the Bible."

                  All religions, including your own, are "man created". That is a self-evident fact.

                  To suggest there are "only 2 religions the worship of the works of Satan or the worship of the Jesus of the Bible" hints at cosmic dualism. I would also add that such an entrenched viewpoint is somewhat disdainful towards other belief systems and their adherents. We know from history where such opinions have led.
                  She was speaking in a colloquial sense, not as an anthropologist. Basically Christians believe that there is only ONE true religion, Christianity. All others are basically the "same" religion: False religion. If you are not worshiping the true God of the universe, then you are in the other camp, that of Satan's. We believe Satan is behind all of the other religions. We don't think he is a god, or God's equal in any way. He is a fallen angel. Yet he is influential in corrupting men or at the very least encouraging corruption, including false religions.

                  So when mossy was saying "there are only two religions" that is what she was talking about. That was pretty clear by her context to most people reading it, but your response was to not grasp what she was saying and instead reply with some nonsense about anthropology.

                  So, no, saying "worshiping the works of Satan" was not a declaration of dualism, or claiming that Satan is a god. It was just a way of saying "If you are not on God's side, then you are against him, and on the side of Satan"
                  But Satan is in no way an equal to God or any sort of deity. He is merely a fallen creature with a humongous chip on his shoulder.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post
                    Then why post an inane gif?
                    H_A-dude.gif

                    I'm always still in trouble again

                    "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                    "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                    "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

                      All religions, including your own, are "man created". That is a self-evident fact.
                      not make it so.jpg
                      1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
                      .
                      ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
                      Scripture before Tradition:
                      but that won't prevent others from
                      taking it upon themselves to deprive you
                      of the right to call yourself Christian.

                      ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by tabibito View Post
                        Read some anthropology.
                        "It ain't necessarily so
                        The things that you're liable
                        To read in the Bible
                        It ain't necessarily so
                        ."

                        Sportin' Life
                        Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Sparko View Post

                          She was speaking in a colloquial sense, not as an anthropologist. Basically Christians believe that there is only ONE true religion, Christianity.
                          She did not write that. She made an emphatic statement, "There are only 2 religions, the worship of the works of Satan or the worship of the Jesus of the Bible." I'd also remind you all that "the Jesus of the Bible" was a practising Jew.

                          Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                          All others are basically the "same" religion: False religion.
                          As would yours be to a practising Jew or Muslim. Wherein lies the difference?

                          Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                          If you are not worshiping the true God of the universe, then you are in the other camp, that of Satan's. We believe Satan is behind all of the other religions. We don't think he is a god, or God's equal in any way. He is a fallen angel. Yet he is influential in corrupting men or at the very least encouraging corruption, including false religions.
                          Once again, you hold that your religion is the only "true" religion and that view would be held by some members of other faiths towards Christianity.

                          Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                          But Satan is in no way an equal to God or any sort of deity. He is merely a fallen creature with a humongous chip on his shoulder.
                          That is a much later Christian construct. Read the Book of Job.
                          "It ain't necessarily so
                          The things that you're liable
                          To read in the Bible
                          It ain't necessarily so
                          ."

                          Sportin' Life
                          Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

                            Read some anthropology.
                            SOMEONE SAYING.jpg
                            1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
                            .
                            ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
                            Scripture before Tradition:
                            but that won't prevent others from
                            taking it upon themselves to deprive you
                            of the right to call yourself Christian.

                            ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post
                              She did not write that. She made an emphatic statement, "There are only 2 religions, the worship of the works of Satan or the worship of the Jesus of the Bible." I'd also remind you all that "the Jesus of the Bible" was a practising Jew.

                              As would yours be to a practising Jew or Muslim. Wherein lies the difference?

                              Once again, you hold that your religion is the only "true" religion and that view would be held by some members of other faiths towards Christianity.

                              That is a much later Christian construct. Read the Book of Job.
                              This all seem to be just your opinion.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Sparko View Post

                                This all seem to be just your opinion.
                                As I said previously, she proves her ignorance of Christianity with every post she makes.


                                Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.

                                Comment

                                widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
                                Working...
                                X