The Honest Atheist?

[seer]

You obviously did not read the very first page. Here it is:



His conclusions:



A valiant attempt but hopeless.

Godel's proof can be resumed as such:"being real is better than not being real and since God is God-like he must be real"
It's circular reasoning.

But hey, you're free to believe in that crap. It's a free country.

No LM, Anderson is preserving some of Godel's points, but he doesn't end there. It is a reworking, and he does deal with the major objections in this new version.

[little_monkey]

No LM, Anderson is preserving some of Godel's points, but he doesn't end there. It is a reworking, and he does deal with the major objections in this new version.

It doesn't change the essential problem. Read the paper, oh wait, you can't understand that stuff, but should you one day get the necessary competence to follow a mathematical proof you will realize that the proof is not about god's existence but about god-like property being positive and consistent... it's a shame you keep embarrassing yourself. I feel sorry for you, honest! As I initially posted to you, and asked you, where's is God in any of the statements you posted? The answer is nowhere, but plenty of "god-like" stuff. Anyhoo, if you ever find the line in that argument in which God's existence is proved, please let me know. LOL.