Announcement

Collapse

Apologetics 301 Guidelines

If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you


This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.


Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

The Honest Atheist?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by little_monkey View Post
    You obviously did not read the very first page. Here it is:



    His conclusions:



    A valiant attempt but hopeless.

    Godel's proof can be resumed as such:"being real is better than not being real and since God is God-like he must be real"
    It's circular reasoning.

    But hey, you're free to believe in that crap. It's a free country.
    No LM, Anderson is preserving some of Godel's points, but he doesn't end there. It is a reworking, and he does deal with the major objections in this new version.
    Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

    Comment


    • Originally posted by seer View Post
      No LM, Anderson is preserving some of Godel's points, but he doesn't end there. It is a reworking, and he does deal with the major objections in this new version.
      It doesn't change the essential problem. Read the paper, oh wait, you can't understand that stuff, but should you one day get the necessary competence to follow a mathematical proof you will realize that the proof is not about god's existence but about god-like property being positive and consistent... it's a shame you keep embarrassing yourself. I feel sorry for you, honest! As I initially posted to you, and asked you, where's is God in any of the statements you posted? The answer is nowhere, but plenty of "god-like" stuff. Anyhoo, if you ever find the line in that argument in which God's existence is proved, please let me know. LOL.

      Comment

      Related Threads

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seer, 01-20-2022, 01:10 PM
      73 responses
      354 views
      0 likes
      Last Post Machinist  
      Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 01-09-2022, 05:51 AM
      187 responses
      873 views
      0 likes
      Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
      Started by Seeker, 12-08-2021, 11:31 PM
      474 responses
      2,756 views
      0 likes
      Last Post Seeker
      by Seeker
       
      Started by seer, 10-11-2021, 07:32 PM
      472 responses
      3,038 views
      1 like
      Last Post shunyadragon  
      Started by seer, 10-06-2021, 06:21 PM
      391 responses
      2,377 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seer
      by seer
       
      Working...
      X