Announcement

Collapse

Apologetics 301 Guidelines

If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you


This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.


Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

My personal experience of evangelism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by lao tzu View Post
    "ivied che"

    Does that have anything to do with cookies?
    yes indeedie

    cookies.jpg
    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by MaxVel View Post
      If I'm reading you right, your issue is with insincerity, dishonesty and deception-by-omission in evangelism, rather than with the idea of evangelism per se?

      I think Jesus wouldn't be too impressed with the kinds of sharp practices you encountered. I've always understood the 'Great Commission' to be about helping people to know Jesus as I know Him, and to choose to consciously and actively follow Him in their lives, for all their lives. That's not the kind of hing that happens if you take 'shortcuts' and rush people into a 'commitment'.
      That's one major difference between the Protestant and Catholic/Orthodox approach. Protestants tend to go for the quick conversion and admittance, then work towards understanding (I've experienced one exception to this, which involved a Hindu convert to Christianity in college). Catholic/Orthodox churches make sure the person has sufficient understanding, only then allowing admittance. Protestants tend to take the same tack in ecumenism, which is why many Orthodox take a dim view of the ecumenical movement (strangely, Catholics tend to be very Protestant-like in this area).
      Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom

      Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
      sigpic
      I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by One Bad Pig View Post
        That's one major difference between the Protestant and Catholic/Orthodox approach. Protestants tend to go for the quick conversion and admittance, then work towards understanding (I've experienced one exception to this, which involved a Hindu convert to Christianity in college). Catholic/Orthodox churches make sure the person has sufficient understanding, only then allowing admittance. Protestants tend to take the same tack in ecumenism, which is why many Orthodox take a dim view of the ecumenical movement (strangely, Catholics tend to be very Protestant-like in this area).
        As far as I'm aware most* confessional Lutheran denominations (which are the only genuine Lutherans IMO ) require you to get catechised before you're allowed to receive communion in their churches.







        *There could be exceptions, but I'm not aware of any.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Jedidiah View Post
          Abigail wrote. "Jesus who in turn teaches us how to love others...." You obviously have failed to learn the "how" since you never fail to not show love in your posts.
          But of course you mean this in the most loving possible way.

          This aside from your dishonesty.
          ...and this.
          “He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Bill the Cat View Post
            Dang dude. That's a bit much, even for this forum...
            Par for the course given Starlight's claims that many Christians are evil.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Bill the Cat View Post
              T'is why Paul said Imitate me as I imitate Christ.
              Paul was a crafty one to be sure. (firstfloor is still reading Robert Eisenman)
              Last edited by firstfloor; 04-26-2015, 04:08 AM.
              “I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
              “And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
              “not all there” - you know who you are

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by firstfloor View Post
                Paul was a crafty one to be sure. (firstfloor is still reading Robert Eisenman)
                Nothing wrong with Robert Eisenman. He is a well respected Biblical scholar. I still read his works.
                Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
                Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
                But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

                go with the flow the river knows . . .

                Frank

                I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
                  Nothing wrong with Robert Eisenman. He is a well respected Biblical scholar. I still read his works.
                  I know. But it is difficult, turn-twisty reading.

                  Which brings me, somehow, to an idea about masters and pupils, and evangelists:

                  The source of knowledge about the universe is the universe itself. As more and more knowledge is extracted human beings have had to specialise in order that progress can continue. Without specialisation we would reach a point when the pupil would consume his entire life simply to copy his master’s knowledge. So progress, which entails a constant revision of ideas, requires the ability to condense experience and pass it on efficiently to future generations by the recruitment of more and more experts in ever more refined areas of knowledge.

                  Now, contrast this process with evangelism. Evangelism is the anti-progressive conservation of magical or sacred knowledge. While it is aimed at giving people a special perspective on the world it is simultaneously a contamination in the endeavour by education to overcome the undesirable aspects of our nature and habits. It looks backwards to a fictional idyllic existence and forwards to an equally fictional cataclysm. THIS WILL NOT DO.
                  Last edited by firstfloor; 04-26-2015, 07:22 AM.
                  “I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
                  “And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
                  “not all there” - you know who you are

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by firstfloor View Post
                    I know. But it is difficult, turn-twisty reading.

                    Which brings me, somehow, to an idea about masters and pupils, and evangelists:

                    The source of knowledge about the universe is the universe itself. As more and more knowledge is extracted human beings have had to specialise in order that progress can continue. Without specialisation we would reach a point when the pupil would consume his entire life simply to copy his master’s knowledge. So progress, which entails a constant revision of ideas, requires the ability to condense experience and pass it on efficiently to future generations by the recruitment of more and more experts in ever more refined areas of knowledge.

                    Now, contrast this process with evangelism. Evangelism is the anti-progressive conservation of magical or sacred knowledge. While it is aimed at giving people a special perspective on the world it is simultaneously a contamination in the endeavour by education to overcome the undesirable aspects of our nature and habits. It looks backwards to a fictional idyllic existence and forwards to an equally fictional cataclysm. THIS WILL NOT DO.

                    You make very little sense. Your first paragraph praises the passing on of knowledge. Your second paragraph condemns it.

                    You've got a massively begged question. You're not comparing apples with apples.


                    In short, while on first glance your post appears eminently sensible, it's full of so much bad logic that it's worthless. THIS WILL NOT DO.
                    ...>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by pancreasman View Post
                      Now, now, if you can, keep it exploratory rather than accusatory.
                      I accuse you of exploring! Fie upon you, explorer!


                      I'd also like to talk about something I observed growing up. On some evenings, while people were ding their late shopping, a small group of guys would hang out on one busy corner. One would produce a Bible and proceed to harangue the world in general (passers-by, anyone who happened to be in earshot) in a loud voice, with passages from the Bible and comments like 'You are a sinner, and God will judge you. Repent and come to Jesus.' The others would kind of loiter around, perhaps hoping to talk to anyone interested. i never saw anyone who was interested. The manner, tone and content of the 'presentation' was judgmental and negative.

                      However, they were evangelising, right? And lives were changed, surprisingly enough....






                      ... the people that used to pass that corner regularly found other ways to go to their destinations, or walked on the far side of the street.


                      Perhaps that's the kind of evangelisation you dislike, Pancreasman. I know I never liked it, even more so when I became a Christian (through no fault of theirs).


                      Thing is, people are people, with all their faults and flaws. It's not easy to form real relationships with others and share the goodness you've found. It's much easier (practically and psychologically) to just talk at someone, or use a system or method that 'works' - and then you can tell yourself that you've done your duty. This s not an excuse,but it is a explanation as to why Christians too often fail in this area.

                      Somewhere I think you mentioned being disappointed with how little different Christians seem to be from ordinary people. I think Jesus probably feels the same way. But I do know that being a Christian has made a huge difference in my own life, and really changed me as a person, for the better, in so many ways. I think the problem is that we change at the speed that, and to the extent that, we allow God to work in us. So some may hardly change at all, and some may change, but slowly.

                      GK Chesterton said:
                      “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult; and left untried.”
                      ...>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Paprika View Post
                        Par for the course given Starlight's claims that many Christians are evil.
                        Wait ... you're saying Darthie acting evil is on par with Starlight saying some Christians are evil? That's seriously twisted.

                        I approve.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by lao tzu View Post
                          Wait ... you're saying Darthie acting evil is on par with Starlight saying some Christians are evil? That's seriously twisted.

                          I approve.

                          I'm saying Darth's attacks are on par with Starlight's.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by One Bad Pig View Post
                            That's one major difference between the Protestant and Catholic/Orthodox approach. Protestants tend to go for the quick conversion and admittance, then work towards understanding (I've experienced one exception to this, which involved a Hindu convert to Christianity in college). Catholic/Orthodox churches make sure the person has sufficient understanding, only then allowing admittance. Protestants tend to take the same tack in ecumenism, which is why many Orthodox take a dim view of the ecumenical movement (strangely, Catholics tend to be very Protestant-like in this area).
                            This method of conversion in the Catholic and Orthodox church may count towards why those denominations are shrinking, and why Islam (in the Northern hemisphere) and Protestantism (in the Southern hemisphere) are filling in the gap.
                            Last edited by Adrift; 04-26-2015, 12:53 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by MaxVel View Post
                              You make very little sense.
                              Ah! Some improvement then.

                              Another very serious problem for evangelists is that they are either acting out of fear of being punished for leaving lost souls behind or they are exploiting other people’s fear of damnation. To put it crudely they are either cowards or charlatans.
                              “I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
                              “And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
                              “not all there” - you know who you are

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by firstfloor View Post
                                Ah! Some improvement then.

                                Another very serious problem for evangelists is that they are either acting out of fear of being punished for leaving lost souls behind or they are exploiting other people’s fear of damnation. To put it crudely they are either cowards or charlatans.
                                Can you name the exact congregation you have in mind so that I know to avoid them? In the 25 years I've been an orthodox Christian, I've never ever seen any evangelists evangelize out of fear or punishment. Ever. That idea is so alien and non-representational of the reality that I've witnessed personally, that I can't help but think you're assuming this based on some sort of odd media-driven stereotype of some sort.

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by whag, Yesterday, 03:01 PM
                                14 responses
                                42 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post tabibito  
                                Started by whag, 03-17-2024, 04:55 PM
                                21 responses
                                129 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                                Started by whag, 03-14-2024, 06:04 PM
                                78 responses
                                411 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post tabibito  
                                Started by whag, 03-13-2024, 12:06 PM
                                45 responses
                                303 views
                                1 like
                                Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                                Working...
                                X