Announcement

Collapse

Apologetics 301 Guidelines

If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you


This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.


Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Objections to the belief that God's law is written on our hearts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Objections to the belief that God's law is written on our hearts

    In a thread in Theology 201 where I am not allowed to respond this question was asked based on Romans 2:12-16 that 'God's law is written on our hearts.' This follows the claim that all humans the belief in God is inherent to human nature regardless what one believes, even the most died in the wool atheists.

    I believe in a more subtle version of this, but not to the degree that some believe that atheists are dishonest to their inner innate belief in God. The potential of God's attributes exists in the hearts of all humans and a witness to all of our physical existence.

    The following posted by thoughtful Monk is what I would like to respond to:

    Originally posted by Thoughtful Monk
    I've seen this thought before. I find that many people that argue all religions worship the same God tend to minimize the differences in the first part and emphasis the second part. I personally don't believe all religions worship the same God because of the vast differences in the conception of the divine, redemption, etc.
    Of course, it is idealistic and unrealistic to argue that ALL religions, churches, and the many diverse and conflicting belief systems believe in the same God.

    Likewise, it is idealistic and unrealistic to believe that out of the many religions, churches, and the many other conflicting belief systems that one may be considered the one 'true' belief for ALL of humanity for time immemorial.

    I do believe in an inherent nature of God and the attributes of God in all humans, but it is more subtle than proposed in the claims of any one religion or belief system.

    More to follow . . .

    Seer may not post in this thread for obvious reasons of rampant off topic rants.
    Last edited by shunyadragon; 05-28-2017, 10:35 PM.
    Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
    Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
    But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

    go with the flow the river knows . . .

    Frank

    I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

  • #2
    Atheist Matthew Adler wrote a book called "The 'God' Part of the Brain." Holding there is a biological reason of human spirituality and the belief in God. Through MRI studies that show that there is a part of the brain associated with human spirituality.

    Makes me think of Romans 1:19,
    Romans 1:19,
    . . . Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; . . .
    . . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV

    . . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV

    Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
      Romans 2:12-16 that 'God's law is written on our hearts.' This follows the claim that all humans the belief in God is inherent to human nature regardless what one believes, even the most died in the wool atheists.
      But Paul is talking about moral behavior here. He's saying that the gentiles can live morally and achieve a positive final judgment from God:

      Rom 2:6-16
      For he will repay according to each one’s deeds: to those who by patiently doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life; while for those who are self-seeking and who obey not the truth but wickedness, there will be wrath and fury. There will be anguish and distress for everyone who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek, but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, the Jew first and also the Greek. For God shows no partiality.

      ...it is... the doers of the law who will be justified. When Gentiles, who do not possess the law, do instinctively what the law requires... They show that what the law requires is written on their hearts... and their conflicting thoughts will accuse or perhaps excuse them on the day when, according to my gospel, God, through Jesus Christ, will judge the secret thoughts of all.

      Paul believes that God's final judgment of people will be based on the morality of a person's actions as understood by them. That is consistently the NT and early Christian depiction of the final judgment. And IMO this section is Paul's reply to his rhetorical opponent's opening statement in 1:18-32, where a Jewish preacher holding to the theology of the book Wisdom of Solomon (and paraphrasing a couple of chapters from that work) claimed that Gentiles all do truly horrible evils as a result of failure to believe in the right God. Paul's response is that, no, Gentiles do lots of good things, and nothing stops them passing God's final judgement as a result.
      "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
      "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
      "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by 37818 View Post
        Through MRI studies that show that there is a part of the brain associated with human spirituality.
        It's called 'the imagination' right?
        "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
        "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
        "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
          In a thread in Theology 201 where I am not allowed to respond this question was asked based on Romans 2:12-16 that 'God's law is written on our hearts.' This follows the claim that all humans the belief in God is inherent to human nature regardless what one believes, even the most died in the wool atheists.

          I believe in a more subtle version of this, but not to the degree that some believe that atheists are dishonest to their inner innate belief in God. The potential of God's attributes exists in the hearts of all humans and a witness to all of our physical existence.

          The following posted by thoughtful Monk is what I would like to respond to:



          Of course, it is idealistic and unrealistic to argue that ALL religions, churches, and the many diverse and conflicting belief systems believe in the same God.

          Likewise, it is idealistic and unrealistic to believe that out of the many religions, churches, and the many other conflicting belief systems that one may be considered the one 'true' belief for ALL of humanity for time immemorial.

          I do believe in an inherent nature of God and the attributes of God in all humans, but it is more subtle than proposed in the claims of any one religion or belief system.

          More to follow . . .

          Seer may not post in this thread for obvious reasons of rampant off topic rants.
          Except he was on topic in the last couple of threads you kicked him out of. It's more you don't like that he has an opposing opinion.
          I am Punkinhead.

          "I have missed you, Oh Grand High Priestess of the Order of the Stirring Pot"

          ~ Cow Poke aka CP aka Creacher aka ke7ejx's apprentice....

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ke7ejx View Post
            Except he was on topic in the last couple of threads you kicked him out of. It's more you don't like that he has an opposing opinion.
            It is Tweb policy that one can choose to exclude someone from a thread if they so desire. There are a number of threads in other places that have addressed seer's issues and questions. I have repeatedly answered seer's questions. He does not accept my answers, nothing new here to be addressed.
            Last edited by shunyadragon; 05-29-2017, 02:35 PM.
            Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
            Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
            But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

            go with the flow the river knows . . .

            Frank

            I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
              It is Tweb policy that one can choose to exclude someone from a thread if they so desire. There are a number of threads in other places that have addressed seer's issues and questions. I have repeatedly answered seer's questions. He does not accept my answers, nothing new here to be addressed.
              Correction: It is Tweb policy to ask people to not participate in a thread if there's a history of the poster being an issue. However, the rule also says:

              But this is not to be taken to extremes and can be denied by moderator decision if we believe it is being abused. In other words, you can't just use this power to keep any critics out of your thread so you can "win"
              You have a nasty little habit of banning people from your threads simply for disagreeing with you. You flagrantly abuse the policy to turn your threads into an echo chamber when you know we are a debate site for a reason.
              I am Punkinhead.

              "I have missed you, Oh Grand High Priestess of the Order of the Stirring Pot"

              ~ Cow Poke aka CP aka Creacher aka ke7ejx's apprentice....

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ke7ejx View Post
                It's more you don't like that he has an opposing opinion.
                That claim seems ridiculous at face value. Seer turns any thread he's in into an argument about the philosophical foundations of morality and then argues about that ad nauseum. If shuny were trying to escape from opposing opinions he's not doing a very good job of it by posting in a public forum where literally everyone in the world can argue with him.
                "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
                "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
                "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ke7ejx View Post
                  Correction: It is Tweb policy to ask people to not participate in a thread if there's a history of the poster being an issue. However, the rule also says:



                  You have a nasty little habit of banning people from your threads simply for disagreeing with you. You flagrantly abuse the policy to turn your threads into an echo chamber when you know we are a debate site for a reason.
                  Document the 'habit of banning people.' It is rare on my part.

                  There is a history of seer being an issue.
                  Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
                  Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
                  But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

                  go with the flow the river knows . . .

                  Frank

                  I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I think the OP is pretty good.

                    Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
                    Likewise, it is idealistic and unrealistic to believe that out of the many religions, churches, and the many other conflicting belief systems that one may be considered the one 'true' belief for ALL of humanity for time immemorial.
                    I think this is largely accurate even from a Biblical perspective.
                    (Assuming the timeline of the Bible for sake of discussion) It is quite clear that for the first several thousand years of Biblical history there wasn't even an organized priesthood.
                    Undoubtedly, the beliefs of Seth, Noah, Abraham and so forth varied considerably.
                    Would Melchizedek be welcome down at the local Catholic Church? Probably not.

                    I'd say what draws these all together isn't the form of their faith as much as the object of their faith.
                    Actually YOU put Trump in the White House. He wouldn't have gotten 1% of the vote if it wasn't for the widespread spiritual and cultural devastation caused by progressive policies. There's no "this country" left with your immigration policies, your "allies" are worthless and even more suicidal than you are and democracy is a sick joke that I hope nobody ever thinks about repeating when the current order collapses. - Darth_Executor striking a conciliatory note in Civics 101

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Starlight View Post
                      It's called 'the imagination' right?
                      Are you saying that the MRI studies show that imagination and what is identified as that spiritual part of the brain are the same?
                      . . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV

                      . . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV

                      Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by 37818 View Post
                        Are you saying that the MRI studies show that imagination and what is identified as that spiritual part of the brain are the same?
                        He's playing with you, not making a factual claim.
                        Actually YOU put Trump in the White House. He wouldn't have gotten 1% of the vote if it wasn't for the widespread spiritual and cultural devastation caused by progressive policies. There's no "this country" left with your immigration policies, your "allies" are worthless and even more suicidal than you are and democracy is a sick joke that I hope nobody ever thinks about repeating when the current order collapses. - Darth_Executor striking a conciliatory note in Civics 101

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Meh Gerbil View Post
                          I think the OP is pretty good.

                          I think this is largely accurate even from a Biblical perspective.
                          (Assuming the timeline of the Bible for sake of discussion) It is quite clear that for the first several thousand years of Biblical history there wasn't even an organized priesthood.
                          Undoubtedly, the beliefs of Seth, Noah, Abraham and so forth varied considerably.
                          Would Melchizedek be welcome down at the local Catholic Church? Probably not.

                          I'd say what draws these all together isn't the form of their faith as much as the object of their faith.
                          Actually, and it may be rare, but I agree with you here to a certain extent, but I will question the timeline, and be more inclusive as the spiritual history of humanity.

                          I consider religions to be to a certain degree the human view of God through the cultural perspective of the time an place in human history, and the relationship with humanity as the object , and not the form of the belief system.
                          Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
                          Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
                          But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

                          go with the flow the river knows . . .

                          Frank

                          I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
                            Actually, and it may be rare, but I agree with you here to a certain extent, but I will question the timeline, and be more inclusive as the spiritual history of humanity.

                            I consider religions to be to a certain degree the human view of God through the cultural perspective of the time an place in human history, and the relationship with humanity as the object , and not the form of the belief system.
                            Certainly we view our place in the world through the “cultural perspective of the time and place in human history”, but must this necessarily include a deity? Could one not argue that we have moved beyond the need to understand the universe in terms of a god or gods?
                            “He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by 37818 View Post
                              Atheist Matthew Adler wrote a book called "The 'God' Part of the Brain." Holding there is a biological reason of human spirituality and the belief in God. Through MRI studies that show that there is a part of the brain associated with human spirituality.
                              That is how some people interpreted those MRI studies.

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by whag, 03-17-2024, 04:55 PM
                              1 response
                              24 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post whag
                              by whag
                               
                              Started by whag, 03-14-2024, 06:04 PM
                              61 responses
                              290 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post whag
                              by whag
                               
                              Started by whag, 03-13-2024, 12:06 PM
                              45 responses
                              299 views
                              1 like
                              Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                              Started by shunyadragon, 02-15-2024, 11:52 AM
                              74 responses
                              319 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post whag
                              by whag
                               
                              Started by whag, 02-06-2024, 12:46 PM
                              60 responses
                              337 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post whag
                              by whag
                               
                              Working...
                              X