The book ™Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design" says that Alvin Plantinga believed that ID was legit science.
The book was co-authored by Barbara Forest, the expert witness in the Dover trial who discovered the transitional manuscript of "Of Pandas and People," which showed strong evidence of a global replace of the term "creation science" with "intelligent design," as well as other damning substitutions.
ID began full force in 1992 after Stephen Jay Gould's review of Phillip Johnson's "Darwin on Trial." After that, Johnson's supporters William Dembski, Stephen Meyer, and others formed a group called the Ad Hoc Origins Committee to make their skepticism of evolution known. The book claims that Plantinga was one of the signatories on a letter that requested that theistic science get a fair hearing. Earlier than that in 1991, he complained about ID progress being slowed by prestigious universities who refused to give theistic science a fair shake.
Is there any way to determine what changed Plantinga's mind and when?
The book was co-authored by Barbara Forest, the expert witness in the Dover trial who discovered the transitional manuscript of "Of Pandas and People," which showed strong evidence of a global replace of the term "creation science" with "intelligent design," as well as other damning substitutions.
ID began full force in 1992 after Stephen Jay Gould's review of Phillip Johnson's "Darwin on Trial." After that, Johnson's supporters William Dembski, Stephen Meyer, and others formed a group called the Ad Hoc Origins Committee to make their skepticism of evolution known. The book claims that Plantinga was one of the signatories on a letter that requested that theistic science get a fair hearing. Earlier than that in 1991, he complained about ID progress being slowed by prestigious universities who refused to give theistic science a fair shake.
Is there any way to determine what changed Plantinga's mind and when?
Comment