The problem of unsubstantiated probability in the following represents an interesting problem with Plantinga's argument against Naturalism.
Serious question here; How does Plantinga objectively determine that the probability is 'Inscrutable?'
I need a better answer then 'plausibly maintains.'
Originally posted by http://www.indiana.edu/~scotus/files/House_Divided.pdf
I need a better answer then 'plausibly maintains.'
Comment