Originally posted by OingoBoingo
View Post
Context does not help you because you made too many false statements in your previous posts. You did manage to cite Plantinga's out of context, out of date, Darwin's quotes on his justified doubts of the limited knowledge of science at the time, which have no relevance to the level of knowledge in science today concerning evolution. You have failed to realize that Plantinga conflates Methodological with Metaphysical Naturalism, and uses his own concept of evolution and not the accepted evolution of science.
Actually Plantinga also describes and ridicules contemporary evolution as the Grand Evolutionary Myth (GEM). Why would Plantinga go into great lengths to argue ID, conflate Methodological NAturalism with Metaphysical Naturalism, and long misguided arguments of probability, if he is not using all this to argue for the existence of God against atheism his whole dialogue becomes ridiculous.Just examples??? That's a farse.
Leave a comment: