In another thread, Lee Merrill and I have veered into child birth pangs territory, and I must admit I don't have a lot of hope for Lee convincing me human history and anatomical development are insufficient means to explain child birth pangs. He opts for "the curse" explanation. I think this is more logical:
https://www.americanscientist.org/ar...rth-so-painful
Is there any good evidence that morning sickness and the necessity of epidurals is a curse rather than the explanations offered by science?
Why would God expect rational minds to regard the pain of child bearing and childbirth as a supernatural "curse" rather than a culmination of anatomical evolution?
https://www.americanscientist.org/ar...rth-so-painful
Is there any good evidence that morning sickness and the necessity of epidurals is a curse rather than the explanations offered by science?
Why would God expect rational minds to regard the pain of child bearing and childbirth as a supernatural "curse" rather than a culmination of anatomical evolution?
Comment