Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria
View Post
Forecasting the day of someone's death and the means they will die also pushes the boundaries of coincidence.
But even if they are nothing but coincidences, the fact is that such "coincidences" do take place and is therefore hardly a legitimate reason for discounting something as evidence it must have been written after the fact.
If Gulliver's Travels were examined by certain scholars, they would have no choice but declare that Swift's book wasn't actually written until well over a century after his death.
Comment