Representations and depictions of the deity

[rogue06]

You can always avail yourself of an inter-library loan copy of a text.

And wait a week or two to get it long after the conversation moved on. Not really an option hypocrite.

[rogue06]

So what does that tell you?

That being the hypocrite you are you complain about other doing the exact same thing as you do all the time.

My opinion of your comments at the time is that you wanted a fight over Patrick Frank's article.

An article you pretended to have access to for some strange reason. I don't know if I'll ever understand why you didn't say you didn't just have access to a 20-year old article instead of pretending you did. I mean, what was the point?

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

That being the hypocrite you are you complain about other doing the exact same thing as you do all the time.

I have often cited from works that are not available online.

An article you pretended to have access to for some strange reason.

I have a copy and I have read it. And that you have once again brought up this topic suggests you are still itching for a fight,.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

And wait a week or two to get it long after the conversation moved on. Not really an option hypocrite.

Were you aware that you can actually buy books?

[tabibito]

You wrote Persecution by the Jews.

How did the subsequent list of incidents relate to the Jews persecuting anyone?

As for Williams, what precise comment by her leads you to remark that she "admits that much of her assessment is based on reading between the lines"?

[/QUOTE]

Ah yes - I omitted the time reference.
Prior to 64 CE - Persecution of the Christians by the Jews.

[rogue06]

I have often cited from works that are not available online.

So have I and everyone else here. But only you chide folks for using online resources as well like the hypocrite you are.

I have a copy and I have read it. And that you have once again brought up this topic suggests you are still itching for a fight,.

No you haven't or else you would have noticed I put stuff in my posts from other sources as well while suggesting they were from Frank's piece and you thought they were from the article.

[rogue06]

Were you aware that you can actually buy books?

Were you aware that the exact same problem with waiting for a intra-library loan exists with that as well?

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Ah yes - I omitted the time reference.
Prior to 64 CE - Persecution of the Christians by the Jews.

What was this "persecution" and how did it manifest itself?

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

So have I and everyone else here. But only you chide folks for using online resources as well like the hypocrite you are.

As previously noted some books [or parts of them] are available online, however, that does not presuppose that I do not have hard copies of those works. However, to persistently rely on Wiki or what can be gleaned from what is available on line via Google Books or general internet sites indicates that the person who uses such sources has no such volumes to hand; and is unlikely to have actually read those works.

No you haven't or else you would have noticed I put stuff in my posts from other sources as well while suggesting they were from Frank's piece and you thought they were from the article.

I made my points concerning Frank's article on the thread at the time.

You really do want a fight, don't you?

[tabibito]

What was this "persecution" and how did it manifest itself?

Both Paul and Luke refer to it. But you still have not provided supporting sources for your claim that Deuteronomy 32:8-9 (in contradiction to verse 4) shows that YHVH and El are two different entities.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Both Paul and Luke refer to it.

That cannot be considered to be attested historical evidence without some extraneous corroborative sources.

[rogue06]

As previously noted some books [or parts of them] are available online, however, that does not presuppose that I do not have hard copies of those works.

Likewise hypocrite.

However, to persistently rely on Wiki or what can be gleaned from what is available on line via Google Books or general internet sites indicates that the person who uses such sources has no such volumes to hand; and is unlikely to have actually read those works.

For someone who whines about not being able to read minds when you misread something you sure do make a lot of presumptions. Hypocrite.

I made my points concerning Frank's article on the thread at the time.

Points that you like to call generalized and over-simplified.

You wrote nothing that indicates that you actually read the article. And given that I purposefully included stuff that wasn't in the article but from other sources (but implied it was in the article), and that you didn't notice, demonstrates that you never read it. In fact the last thing was so bloody obvious it would be impossible to miss. That would be the rather large colored graph. None of the graphs or charts in the article were in color. They are all in black and white. That graph came from a review of the work that Frank's was largely citing.

You never commented on it, but rather were in avoidance mode by that point but if you had read the article that graph would have stuck out like a sore thumb.

You really do want a fight, don't you?

Naw. I'm having too much fun exposing hypocritical fakers and frauds

Like the time you pretended to have read a post that you mocked but I had checked the number of views and it showed that nobody had read it since I looked. The thing is your arrogance and hubris actually makes it easy to catch your B.S. -- almost (but not quite) to the point of falling in the category of advice my father offered -- don't tease a dumb dog (not much accomplishment in doing so against someone incapable of fighting back).

[rogue06]

That cannot be considered to be attested historical evidence without some extraneous corroborative sources.

Doofus. Paul and Luke count as attested historical evidence

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Doofus. Paul and Luke count as attested historical evidence

This issue requires corroborative contemporary extraneous evidence.

[rogue06]

This issue requires corroborative contemporary extraneous evidence.

Why? It isn't like some sort of incredible claim was being made.

Your hypocrisy is showing.