Announcement
Collapse
Apologetics 301 Guidelines
If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
What is your major malfunction...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Machinist View Post
Why is that?
So anything that can happen will have happened somewhere. No matter how unlikely. And it will have happened an infinite number of times.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Postthe infinite God is possible, so if the universe is infinite, he will exist.
What physicists usually mean by talking about all possible worlds though, is usually just all possible numeric variations on the basic physical laws. It's not at all the same thing as all conceivable universes existing. Also a general assumption tends to be that those universes wouldn't be able to interact with each other in any way.
I agree that if all conceivable universes existed, a claim which nobody is really making, then a number of them (an infinite number) would contain god(s). But those god(s) would then be local to those universes, as they presumably wouldn't be able to interact with other universes. (The mind boggles at what would happen if an infinite number of different god(s) all with infinitely varied personalities were able to interact between universes) So you don't really get anywhere near the conclusion you seem to want to reach - the best you could say is that a Christian-like god would exist in some universes."I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
"[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostMagic could just be the result of some physical laws in another part of the galaxy. Heck what we do now would be magic to people of a few hundred years ago. Talking to people instantly across the planet on little magic boxes.
But "indistinguishable from" does not mean "identical to". I was referring to magic that isn't the result of advanced technology, but is something that can't be explained naturally.
Also an infinite universe wouldn't be limited by your imagination, or mine. Infinite means that somewhere anything possible would have to happen. Which is why I think an actual physically infinitely extant universe is impossible. It's just too absurd.
To put it another way, you can't say that anything will happen as long as you don't know that it's impossible. You'd have to know that it's possible.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostAs an unbeliever what is your single greatest objection to Christianity. I'm not looking for a litany of objections, just the single most important one to you. Perhaps me and other Christians here can provide reasonable answers. Please let's keep it civil...
To scale, that's like me asking for proper comprehension of myself from a particular subatomic particle tucked inside a lint ball under my fridge.
And I'm asked to accumulate these correct beliefs without seeing.
As if there's going to be a lot of call for that in eternity.
I like the charity thing, though, and the do unto others bit, and the caring for your community. I like a lot of things about Christianity, but ya gotta admit, the back story needs work.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Juvenal View PostI like the charity thing, though, and the do unto others bit, and the caring for your community. I like a lot of things about Christianity, but ya gotta admit, the back story needs work.
In certain strands of Buddhism we see hundreds or thousands of pages of teachings focusing on helping followers learn the ways of moral self-improvement and how to meditate upon loving-kindness etc. In Christianity, that is hand-waved away under 'sanctification' and often classified as "something the holy spirit does inside the believer, you don't need to worry too much about it" and positive virtues have a tendency to appear in the NT as a simple list of fruits of the spirit with little explanation of how the Christian is supposed to achieve them or work toward them. The NT is, simply put, not at all any sort of great instruction manual for moral self-improvement.
There is a little bit more in the NT on charitable acts towards others, than there is on the topic of moral self-improvement, but again, not much. The topic is almost completely lacking in details or in methods. Since most Christians today flatly refuse to follow what very few instructions the NT does have on the topic - to sell everything one owns and give / share it all with the poor - the result is that when it actually comes to the details of giving to charity there's not much to go on.
So as I said in my post, and you repeated in yours, the theological backstory of Christianity is poorly written and the plot needs a complete rewrite, but the part where it actually does something in the life of the adherent is itself bad also - it's about as useful/useless as handwavingly saying "do some good stuff guys" and leaving it at that. If Christians are going to pretend to / claim to have a perfect God-given morality it needs to be a complete list of good stuff along with a thorough manual of how to achieve it. But in practice the bible either doesn't address at all or speaks positively about what we would today generally consider the three morally worst possible actions: Genocide, slavery, and torture. And it's pretty spotty at best on the rest of the topic of morality."I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
"[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Originally posted by Juvenal View Post
In a universe that appeared 13.7 billion years ago, on a planet that formed 4.6 billion years ago, in an emerging but questionably conscious species that has been anatomically modern for hundreds of thousands of years, the creator of all this suddenly decided it was time for an intervention, chose to follow the Hindu lead and incarnated, briefly, before abruptly departing, leaving behind contradictory traditions written by followers who immediately began splintering in the beliefs I'm told it's important to get right.
And I'm asked to accumulate these correct beliefs without seeing.
As if there's going to be a lot of call for that in eternity.
I like the charity thing, though, and the do unto others bit, and the caring for your community. I like a lot of things about Christianity, but ya gotta admit, the back story needs work.
Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostAgreed. But I was reflecting today that even the charity thing needs work: What teachings Christianity has on either charitable action, or self moral-improvement are exceptionally brief and not overly helpful in helping Christians learn to do those things.
In certain strands of Buddhism we see hundreds or thousands of pages of teachings focusing on helping followers learn the ways of moral self-improvement and how to meditate upon loving-kindness etc. In Christianity, that is hand-waved away under 'sanctification' and often classified as "something the holy spirit does inside the believer, you don't need to worry too much about it" and positive virtues have a tendency to appear in the NT as a simple list of fruits of the spirit with little explanation of how the Christian is supposed to achieve them or work toward them. The NT is, simply put, not at all any sort of great instruction manual for moral self-improvement.
You still don't get it do you. Tell me where is the Buddhist paradise? With the thousands of teachings on self-improvement? A good portion of the Japanese officer corps in WW2 were Buddhists, did that stop the Rape of Nanjing or their other atrocities? https://www.quora.com/How-was-Zen-Bu...an-during-WWII
And you don't need thousands of pages of moral teaching, like I said in the past, if all men followed the golden rule from the heart we would have a peaceful world - though not necessarily moral. And contemplating the sound of one hand clapping is not going to change a man's moral direction.
And you never did respond to your category error: https://theologyweb.com/campus/forum...27#post1254727Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostYou still don't get it do you. Tell me where is the Buddhist paradise?
Is what I'm supposed to be 'getting' that you will stubbornly and flatly refuse to ever change your view in the face of all logic and evidence, and will instead just reask random and silly questions until the heat death of the universe? Because I sure am getting that.
With the thousands of teachings on self-improvement? A good portion of the Japanese officer corps in WW2 were Buddhists, did that stop the Rape of Nanjing or their other atrocities? https://www.quora.com/How-was-Zen-Bu...an-during-WWII
I'm an atheist after all, so you don't need to convince me that overall religion is a bad idea.
like I said in the past, if all men followed the golden rule from the heart we would have a peaceful world
And contemplating the sound of one hand clapping is not going to change a man's moral direction.
And you never did respond to your category error: https://theologyweb.com/campus/forum...27#post1254727"I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
"[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostYou're right, I don't get your non sequiturs.
Is what I'm supposed to be 'getting' that you will stubbornly and flatly refuse to ever change your view in the face of all logic and evidence, and will instead just reask random and silly questions until the heat death of the universe? Because I sure am getting that.
There are plenty of variants of Buddhism just as there are Christianity. Plenty of them have done bad things, just as plenty of Christian groups have.
Sure. So have you converted to Confucianism? After all, Confucius uttered the golden rule some five centuries before Jesus did.
I couldn't make any sense of your statement. If you think you were making a valid point or argument, you need to explain it.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostMorality is nothing like physical distance.
Physical distance exists whether minds exist or not. Morality is mind dependent and therefore subject. And inter subjective."I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
"[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostBoth to be seem to be similar in that they are both measurements of relations between things.
If minds exist, then truths about relationships between them will exist. Just as if objects exist, truths about distances between them will exist. So if minds exist then morality can exist, just as if objects exist then distance can exist.
Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostIs distance mind dependent?
Is morality mind dependent?
So overall distance and morality seem very similar to me."I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
"[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostYes and no. It exists, though exists differently in different reference frames (i.e. the Theory of Relativity), and people can choose to measure it in different ways and with different measurement units.
Yes and no. It exists, though people can choose to measure it in different ways.
So overall distance and morality seem very similar to me.
Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-17-2024, 08:31 AM
|
15 responses
74 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Yesterday, 09:46 AM | ||
Started by Neptune7, 04-15-2024, 06:54 AM
|
25 responses
148 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cerebrum123
04-17-2024, 08:31 AM
|
||
Started by whag, 04-09-2024, 01:04 PM
|
102 responses
558 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by tabibito
Yesterday, 11:43 PM
|
||
Started by whag, 04-07-2024, 10:17 AM
|
39 responses
251 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by tabibito
04-12-2024, 02:58 PM
|
||
Started by whag, 03-27-2024, 03:01 PM
|
154 responses
1,017 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by whag
04-12-2024, 12:39 PM
|
Comment