Announcement

Collapse

Apologetics 301 Guidelines

If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you


This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.


Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Apologetic Value of the "Good Person Test"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Apologetic Value of the "Good Person Test"

    I was wondering what the Christians here thought about the apologetic value of what's called "The Good Person Test"

    It goes something like the following with my comments in brackets.

    1. Do you think you're a good person?

    [I think when most people think of themselves as a "good person", it's due to not doing egregious acts like murder et al and includes an aggregation of behaviour rather than if you did one thing wrong, you're a "bad person".]

    2. Have you ever lied?
    That would make you a liar.

    [When I think of a "liar", I tend to thing of an individual who lies as a matter of habit and situation. Much like the story of the boy who cried wolf. The villages end up not believing the boy due to repetition of the lie of the wolf, (Perhaps if he changed the lie, the boy might be more believable, or just not lied at all, both are apt as a moral of the story) I don't think things like empathetic lies are the same, degree wise, as say lying on a application or perjury. ]

    3. Have you ever stolen something? (Even something like a fry seems to qualify.)
    That would make you a thief.

    [Same concept as above.]

    4. Have you ever lusted?
    That would make you an adulterer.

    [I don't view lust, in general, as a sin, even from a Biblical viewpoint. Given the hyperbolic language of Matthew 5:20, what follows looks more like what you would expect with the practice of chumra. In each the case, the Halakha is pronounced and then Jesus makes a greater restriction. If you are cautious to hate a person, you would be less likely to murder that person. If you are more cautious in lusting, you would be less likely to commit adultery or fornication. If you divorce only for the cause of fornication, you would be less inclined to divorce for no fault.]

    5. Have you have hated someone?
    That would make you a murderer.

    See above.

    6. Have you ever taken God's name in vain?
    That makes you a blasphemer.

    [In Exodus 19:5, God is setting Israel separate form other peoples so I would question the applicability of the Ten Commandments to non-Jews (and non-Christians later on).]

    You're guilty of breaking God's law and God should send you Hell unless you repent.
    P1) If , then I win.

    P2)

    C) I win.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Diogenes View Post
    I was wondering what the Christians here thought about the apologetic value of what's called "The Good Person Test"
    I think it is generally on point, with the overall suggestion being that we are all sinners in need of forgiveness. Though I'm not sure how effective that line of reasoning is to the modern ear...

    Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

    Comment


    • #3
      I have hurt others and I often feel guilty and shameful. I can't speak for others, but there is something about a God, a perfect God incarnating Himself and coming to Earth and suffering in my place, for the things I have done to others that resonates within me. The Death, the Burial and Resurrection has much much mythic significance for me. I love hearing the story of Jesus, and I love hearing sermons at the church I go to.

      I consider myself a good person insofar I probably won't kill anyone or steal, under normal circumstances at least. But I know and feel that I cannot stand before the Creator who can see me through and through. The idea that I have an advocate that will go before me and justify me before God's Holiness gives me comfort whenever I begin to fear such a fate.

      I have lots of questions though. it's a blind faith, and I know that some here would take issue with that, but with me, it's totally blind as a bat. Faith in the Substance of things Hoped for, the Evidence of things not seen.

      I have taken God's name in vain many times in my life. Although I wrestle with the question if I really did take His name in vain, because what is His name exactly? And when I said "God-D*#n it!" was I saying "Lord, please damn thus!" Or was I pointing my haughty finger Heavenward and saying "God...Damn YOU!?"

      I've wrestled with that for years. I assume the latter because I really do think that my members are set against something Holy and Perfect. I would de-throne God and take His place just like Lucifer tried to given the opportunity. I know I would. I'm just as worse as the devil himself, in my heart. I don't go around breaking the law and doing what I want to do because I wouldn't want to spend time in jail or prison.


      I can't speak for others though. I think if we're Saved through Grace, then it's a Custom Salvation. I think my Salvation is Custom, and that;s why i'm very careful when speaking to others about it. I can talk freely here on this forum, but I don't go into much when talking with people face to face. I'm not evangelical that's for sure. I know and respect many people who are though.


      Comment


      • #4
        It's blind because I haven't seen any proof positive evidence that God even exists. It's a pickle.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Machinist View Post
          I have hurt others and I often feel guilty and shameful. I can't speak for others, but there is something about a God, a perfect God incarnating Himself and coming to Earth and suffering in my place, for the things I have done to others that resonates within me. The Death, the Burial and Resurrection has much much mythic significance for me. I love hearing the story of Jesus, and I love hearing sermons at the church I go to.

          I consider myself a good person insofar I probably won't kill anyone or steal, under normal circumstances at least. But I know and feel that I cannot stand before the Creator who can see me through and through. The idea that I have an advocate that will go before me and justify me before God's Holiness gives me comfort whenever I begin to fear such a fate.

          I have lots of questions though. it's a blind faith, and I know that some here would take issue with that, but with me, it's totally blind as a bat. Faith in the Substance of things Hoped for, the Evidence of things not seen.

          I have taken God's name in vain many times in my life. Although I wrestle with the question if I really did take His name in vain, because what is His name exactly? And when I said "God-D*#n it!" was I saying "Lord, please damn thus!" Or was I pointing my haughty finger Heavenward and saying "God...Damn YOU!?"

          I've wrestled with that for years. I assume the latter because I really do think that my members are set against something Holy and Perfect. I would de-throne God and take His place just like Lucifer tried to given the opportunity. I know I would. I'm just as worse as the devil himself, in my heart. I don't go around breaking the law and doing what I want to do because I wouldn't want to spend time in jail or prison.


          I can't speak for others though. I think if we're Saved through Grace, then it's a Custom Salvation. I think my Salvation is Custom, and that;s why i'm very careful when speaking to others about it. I can talk freely here on this forum, but I don't go into much when talking with people face to face. I'm not evangelical that's for sure. I know and respect many people who are though.

          I, for one, am glad you're here.
          The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Machinist View Post
            It's blind because I haven't seen any proof positive evidence that God even exists. It's a pickle.
            There are a lot of things we believe to be true without positive proof...
            Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by seer View Post

              There are a lot of things we believe to be true without positive proof...
              Like the little kid in Sunday School answering the question "what is faith" --- "believing something you know ain't true".

              The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Diogenes View Post
                I was wondering what the Christians here thought about the apologetic value of what's called "The Good Person Test"
                I think its logic is poor. If doing a thing once makes us that thing, then doing good once should make us a good person!

                In actual fact we don't tend to characterize people by what they do once, but rather what they do habitually or typically. i.e. a good person is a person who typically and regularly does good, a liar is a person who typically and habitually lies, a kind person one who is regularly and typically kind, an honest man one who's generally honest etc.

                Interestingly, this is, I think, one of the major theological departures of Protestantism from original Christianity. Originally for Christianity, being a "sinner" was about being a person who regularly and typically sinned, in contrast to the Christ-like / righteous person who regularly and typically did good. In that conception, salvation is about sanctification - the change in a person's moral character from being typically and regularly bad to typically and regularly good. It had nothing to do with sinning once or doing bad once. Whereas Protestantism introduces the new idea of a standard of perfection, and suggests that a single wrong act falling short of that perfect standard requires an infinite penalty to repay - all of which is novel and unbiblical, and you can trace the historical development of that theology over the centuries and millennia if you look at the writings of the various Christian theologians.

                To quote the early Christian theology Origen, writing long before the Protestant ideas were invented:

                Origen's Commentary on Romans volume 1
                5.5.3-4,7 “It is one thing to have sinned, another to be a sinner. One is called a sinner who, by committing many transgressions, has already reached the point of making sinning into a habit and, so to speak, a course of study. Just as, on the other hand, one is not called righteous who has once or twice done some righteous act, but who continually behaves justly and keeps righteousness in use and makes it habitual. For if someone is unjust in nearly all other matters but should carry out some just work one or two times, he will indeed be said to have acted justly in that work in which he practised justice nevertheless he will not be a just man. Similarly it will indeed be said that a righteous man has sinned if he has at some time committed what is not lawful. But he will not on that account be labelled a sinner, since he does not hold fast to the practice and habit of sinning....
                4. For it can happen that all people commit sin, even if they are holy... For who is there who does not sin either in deed or in word or, if one is extremely cautious, at least in thought?....
                7. You may find in the Holy Scriptures many things of this sort in which you will discover both that the righteous man has committed sin and the sinner has done some righteous things. Nevertheless you will not find either the righteous man called a sinner because he sinned in some matter, or the sinner designated as a righteous man because he did something just."

                2.1.2-3 “By common acknowledgement a good man ought not be punished, nor should an evil one obtain good things. Therefore, if, for instance, someone has done evil at some time, it is certain that he was evil at that time when he was doing evil things. However, suppose he, repenting of his past deeds, reforms his mind toward good things, behaves well, speaks well, thinks well, and turns his will toward the good. Is it not clear to you that he who does these things is a good man who deserves to receive good things? In like manner if someone should convert from good to evil, he shall no longer be judged as the good man he was and is no longer, but as the evil man that he is."
                "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
                "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
                "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post

                  I, for one, am glad you're here.
                  Thank you man! That's kind. Glad to be here. It's been fun.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Starlight: Thank you for posting that. That is very insightful.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The Good Person Test was simply the backbone of the church culture I was raised in. It puts me off. Now that maybe because I am not saved, as in protestant saved, rather some other kind of salvation. What starlight here posted really struck a cord with me for instance.

                      The GPT is very Chick-Track feeling. You know those cartoony tracks that the Jesus Hippies hand out to people downtown? Kinda gimmicky.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post

                        Like the little kid in Sunday School answering the question "what is faith" --- "believing something you know ain't true".

                        I think that was Mark Twain...
                        Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Starlight View Post
                          I think its logic is poor. If doing a thing once makes us that thing, then doing good once should make us a good person!
                          Doesn't the Bible say that there is none that do good, no not one? And that anything not done in faith is sin? Are not even our "good works" sullied with mixed motives?

                          Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by seer View Post

                            Doesn't the Bible say that there is none that do good, no not one? And that anything not done in faith is sin? Are not even our "good works" sullied with mixed motives?
                            Our Righteousness is as filthy rags. I does say that. I wonder though what translation Origen had. What was circulating at the time in his neck of the woods?

                            He probably just put more emphasis on certain gospels and not so much Paul's writings perhaps. I don't think there was an official "Canon" , so Christianity I would think was more diverse and flexible at that time.
                            Last edited by Machinist; 02-03-2021, 08:04 AM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I think a better test of a good person is somebody who is (in Christian terms) subscribes to the JOY model - Jesus, Others, You

                              We know that sin is all about self, one's own desires, one's own 'happiness', etc.
                              The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by whag, 04-22-2024, 06:28 PM
                              17 responses
                              79 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Sparko
                              by Sparko
                               
                              Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-17-2024, 08:31 AM
                              55 responses
                              261 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post tabibito  
                              Started by Neptune7, 04-15-2024, 06:54 AM
                              25 responses
                              158 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Cerebrum123  
                              Started by whag, 04-09-2024, 01:04 PM
                              103 responses
                              569 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post tabibito  
                              Started by whag, 04-07-2024, 10:17 AM
                              39 responses
                              251 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post tabibito  
                              Working...
                              X