Announcement

Collapse

Theology 201 Guidelines

This is the forum to discuss the spectrum of views within Christianity on God's foreknowledge and election such as Calvinism, Arminianism, Molinism, Open Theism, Process Theism, Restrictivism, and Inclusivism, Christian Universalism and what these all are about anyway. Who is saved and when is/was their salvation certain? How does God exercise His sovereignty and how powerful is He? Is God timeless and immutable? Does a triune God help better understand God's love for mankind?

While this area is for the discussion of these doctrines within historic Christianity, all theists interested in discussing these areas within the presuppositions of and respect for the Christian framework are welcome to participate here. This is not the area for debate between nontheists and theists, additionally, there may be some topics that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream evangelical doctrine that may be more appropriately placed within Comparative Religions 101 Nontheists seeking only theistic participation only in a manner that does not seek to undermine the faith of others are also welcome - but we ask that Moderator approval be obtained beforehand.

Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 or General Theistics 101 forum without such restrictions. Theists who wish to discuss these issues outside the parameters of orthodox Christian doctrine are invited to Unorthodox Theology 201.

Remember, our forum rules apply here as well. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Free will?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by footwasher View Post

    I mean we have lost the information that the 1st century believers had, because we don't study Scripture by ourselves, but just depend on spoonfeeding by pastors.
    I study what they believed in the Creeds. And spend time disproving what people think they believed.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Dave L View Post

      I study what they believed in the Creeds. And spend time disproving what people think they believed.
      Well the Creeds are not Scripture, inspired by the Holy Spirit, in fact many scholars believe that even the Creeds need to be reformed, changed. They were written as knee jerk responses to people who made claims that went against what the leaders of the church believed, which may have been true, but not proved. Doctor Daniel B Wallace who wrote many textbooks, including the Greek grammar used by all theological seminaries writes that even the Bible never claims that Scripture is protected by God:

      Quote
      First, the doctrine of preservation was not a doctrine of the ancient church. In fact, it was not stated in any creed until the seventeenth century (in the Westminster Confession of 1646). The recent arrival of such a doctrine, of course, does not necessarily argue against it—but neither does its youthfulness argue for it. Perhaps what needs to be explored more fully is precisely what the framers of the Westminster Confession and the Helvetic Consensus Formula (in 1675) really meant by providential preservation.

      https://bible.org/article/inspiratio...tual-criticism
      Last edited by footwasher; 10-30-2020, 05:25 PM.

      Comment

      widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
      Working...
      X