Announcement

Collapse

Theology 201 Guidelines

This is the forum to discuss the spectrum of views within Christianity on God's foreknowledge and election such as Calvinism, Arminianism, Molinism, Open Theism, Process Theism, Restrictivism, and Inclusivism, Christian Universalism and what these all are about anyway. Who is saved and when is/was their salvation certain? How does God exercise His sovereignty and how powerful is He? Is God timeless and immutable? Does a triune God help better understand God's love for mankind?

While this area is for the discussion of these doctrines within historic Christianity, all theists interested in discussing these areas within the presuppositions of and respect for the Christian framework are welcome to participate here. This is not the area for debate between nontheists and theists, additionally, there may be some topics that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream evangelical doctrine that may be more appropriately placed within Comparative Religions 101 Nontheists seeking only theistic participation only in a manner that does not seek to undermine the faith of others are also welcome - but we ask that Moderator approval be obtained beforehand.

Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 or General Theistics 101 forum without such restrictions. Theists who wish to discuss these issues outside the parameters of orthodox Christian doctrine are invited to Unorthodox Theology 201.

Remember, our forum rules apply here as well. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Standing in Judgment Over God?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Standing in Judgment Over God?

    I was watching some videos about presuppositional apologetics and that made me think of some questions. You don't need to know what those videos were in order for you to understand my questions. How would you answer the following questions?

    If someone presents some evidence of Christianity to a non-Christian and then says, "follow the evidence where it leads", does this mean that he is allowing the non-Christian to stand in judgment over God?

    If a Christian says, "I could be wrong about whether God exists", does this mean that he is putting himself as the judge of whether or not God exists?

    If there is some evidence outside of the Bible that could convince a Christian that Christianity is not true, then does this mean that he doesn't really believe that the Bible is the final authority? Is he standing in judgment over the Bible?

  • #2
    No.

    Comment


    • #3
      The question doesn't make any sense. The Bereans were commended for cheking out what Paul was saying. We are to love God with all our mind and to count the cost.
      If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!

      Comment


      • #4
        I wonder what hardcore presuppers make of Psalm 34:8 (O taste and see that the Lord is good).
        "I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill

        Comment


        • #5
          Negatory.
          "Neighbor, how long has it been since you’ve had a big, thick, steaming bowl of Wolf Brand Chili?”

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Hornet View Post
            If someone presents some evidence of Christianity to a non-Christian and then says, "follow the evidence where it leads", does this mean that he is allowing the non-Christian to stand in judgment over God?
            God presents evidence for his existence and his claims, and expects the same for counter-claims:

            " 'Present your case,' says the LORD. 'Set forth your arguments,' says Jacob’s King." (Isa. 41:21)

            "Who told of this from the beginning, so we could know,
            or beforehand, so we could say, ‘He was right’?
            No one told of this,
            no one foretold it,
            no one heard any words from you.
            I was the first to tell Zion, ‘Look, here they are!’
            I gave to Jerusalem a messenger of good news." (Isa. 41:26–27)

            If there is some evidence outside of the Bible that could convince a Christian that Christianity is not true, then does this mean that he doesn't really believe that the Bible is the final authority? Is he standing in judgment over the Bible?
            The fact that the Bible is the final authority, and my recognition of that fact, are two different things. I wouldn't call coming to recognize the final authority "standing in judgment", rather it is the natural process of coming to know a fact.

            And if there was conclusive evidence that Christianity was untrue, then the Bible would not in fact be the final authority. I believe God wants us to seek the truth above all things, and thus to come to believe in him who is the Truth.

            "Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; or at least believe on the evidence of the works themselves." (John 14:11)

            "They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved." (2 Thess. 2:10)

            Blessings,
            Lee
            "What I pray of you is, to keep your eye upon Him, for that is everything. Do you say, 'How am I to keep my eye on Him?' I reply, keep your eye off everything else, and you will soon see Him. All depends on the eye of faith being kept on Him. How simple it is!" (J.B. Stoney)

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Christianbookworm View Post
              The question doesn't make any sense. The Bereans were commended for cheking out what Paul was saying. We are to love God with all our mind and to count the cost.
              The Bereans were checking what Paul said with what the Scriptures were saying. What I'm talking about is different. Presuppositionalists say that if you use evidence outside of the Bible to determine whether the Bible is true, then you are judging the Bible or judging God.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Hornet View Post
                I was watching some videos about presuppositional apologetics and that made me think of some questions. You don't need to know what those videos were in order for you to understand my questions. How would you answer the following questions?

                If someone presents some evidence of Christianity to a non-Christian and then says, "follow the evidence where it leads", does this mean that he is allowing the non-Christian to stand in judgment over God?

                If a Christian says, "I could be wrong about whether God exists", does this mean that he is putting himself as the judge of whether or not God exists?

                If there is some evidence outside of the Bible that could convince a Christian that Christianity is not true, then does this mean that he doesn't really believe that the Bible is the final authority? Is he standing in judgment over the Bible?
                1. Unless God exists, God cannot be judged. Because a God who does not do anything and who has no attributes, cannot be judged.

                2. What he would be judging is not God, but whether propositions about God are found persuasive by him.

                3. There is plenty of evidence of that sort. An admission that it exists, is not the same as an admission that it is convincing, or even persuasive - let alone well-founded.

                4. A response to the Bible, can take the form of judgement of it of the kind described - or, of submission to it. Or, of a believing and faith-filled submission to it, which does not exclude criticism of elements in it. For instance, a believing Christian may well have a very low estimate of some of its contents because they are unworthy of the highest and noblest elements in what it reveals about God. A Christian who rejects the picture of God revealed in a chapter such as 1 Sam. 15 may well be doing so because that picture falls short not only of the God of the Prophets, but, crucially, of the God revealed in Jesus Christ. So there is, in such a case, an element of criticism - but it is based on what Scripture shows God to be like.

                So this last pair of questions raises quite a complicated issue. The true revelation of God is not a book, but a Divine Person. This is not a sidelining of the authority of the Bible, but a refusal to give to it the primacy and ultimacy and “canonicity” that belong to Christ alone. The Bible is important, of that there can be no doubt. But it is not Christ, not His Father, not His Holy Spirit.

                Comment


                • #9
                  The fact that the Bible is the final authority, and my recognition of that fact, are two different things. I wouldn't call coming to recognize the final authority "standing in judgment", rather it is the natural process of coming to know a fact.
                  Is there a difference between coming to recognize which book has the final authority and a criteria for determining which book is the word of God? If someone says, "I believe that the Bible is the word of God because it passes the criteria for deciding which book is the word of God", does he believe that the criteria is the final authority?
                  Last edited by Hornet; 03-19-2020, 08:36 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Hornet View Post
                    Is there a difference between coming to recognize which book has the final authority and a criteria for determining which book is the word of God?
                    I don't believe there is a substantial difference, there do need to be some criteria for coming to recognize which book has final authority.

                    If someone says, "I believe that the Bible is the word of God because it passes the criteria for deciding which book is the word of God", does he believe that the criteria is the final authority?
                    No, the criteria lead us to belief, "believe on the evidence of the works themselves", said Jesus, of his own claim to be the Messiah. I would prefer to use the word "evidence", rather than "criteria" here, since God offers evidence for trusting in his word.

                    "As the rain and the snow
                    come down from heaven,
                    and do not return to it
                    without watering the earth
                    and making it bud and flourish,
                    so that it yields seed for the sower and bread for the eater,
                    so is my word that goes out from my mouth:
                    It will not return to me empty,
                    but will accomplish what I desire
                    and achieve the purpose for which I sent it." (Isa. 55:10–11)

                    God's word accomplishes its purpose, faith comes through hearing the word (Rom. 10:17), verses like these give evidence that the Bible is God's word. And evidence is embodied in God's word, so it's not separate criteria that judge the word.

                    Blessings,
                    Lee
                    "What I pray of you is, to keep your eye upon Him, for that is everything. Do you say, 'How am I to keep my eye on Him?' I reply, keep your eye off everything else, and you will soon see Him. All depends on the eye of faith being kept on Him. How simple it is!" (J.B. Stoney)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Hornet View Post
                      I was watching some videos about presuppositional apologetics and that made me think of some questions. You don't need to know what those videos were in order for you to understand my questions. How would you answer the following questions?

                      If someone presents some evidence of Christianity to a non-Christian and then says, "follow the evidence where it leads", does this mean that he is allowing the non-Christian to stand in judgment over God?

                      If a Christian says, "I could be wrong about whether God exists", does this mean that he is putting himself as the judge of whether or not God exists?

                      If there is some evidence outside of the Bible that could convince a Christian that Christianity is not true, then does this mean that he doesn't really believe that the Bible is the final authority? Is he standing in judgment over the Bible?
                      Judging the evidence for God, is not the same as judging God. Criticising the arguments of apologists is not criticising apologists, or God.

                      Comment

                      Related Threads

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by Kenneth Roberson, 11-08-2020, 09:37 AM
                      5 responses
                      54 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post Kenneth Roberson  
                      Started by footwasher, 11-03-2020, 01:24 AM
                      19 responses
                      92 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post footwasher  
                      Started by lee_merrill, 06-29-2020, 06:29 PM
                      241 responses
                      2,433 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post footwasher  
                      Working...
                      X