What is the first thing a Christian needs to understand toward seeing [orthodox] preterism is the truth ?
Announcement
Collapse
Eschatology 201 Guidelines
This area of the forum is primarily for Christian theists to discuss orthodox views of Eschatology. Other theist participation is welcome within that framework, but only within orthodoxy. Posts from nontheists that do not promote atheism or seek to undermine the faith of others will be permitted at the Moderator's discretion - such posters should contact the area moderators before posting.
Without turning this forum into a 'hill of foreskins' (Joshua 5:3), I believe we can still have fun with this 'sensitive' topic.
However, don't be misled, dispensationalism has only partly to do with circumcision issues. So, let's not forget about Innocence, Conscience, Promises, Kingdoms and so on.
End time -isms within orthodox Christianity also discussed here. Clearly unorthodox doctrines, such as those advocating "pantelism/full preterism/Neo-Hymenaeanism" or the denial of any essential of the historic Christian faith are not permitted in this section but can be discussed in Comparative Religions 101 without restriction. Any such threads, as well as any that within the moderator's discretions fall outside mainstream evangelical belief, will be moved to the appropriate area.
Millennialism- post-, pre- a-
Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism, or just your garden variety Zionism.
From the tribulation to the anichrist. Whether your tastes run from Gary DeMar to Tim LaHaye or anywhere in between, your input is welcome here.
OK folks, let's roll!
Forum Rules: Here
Without turning this forum into a 'hill of foreskins' (Joshua 5:3), I believe we can still have fun with this 'sensitive' topic.
However, don't be misled, dispensationalism has only partly to do with circumcision issues. So, let's not forget about Innocence, Conscience, Promises, Kingdoms and so on.
End time -isms within orthodox Christianity also discussed here. Clearly unorthodox doctrines, such as those advocating "pantelism/full preterism/Neo-Hymenaeanism" or the denial of any essential of the historic Christian faith are not permitted in this section but can be discussed in Comparative Religions 101 without restriction. Any such threads, as well as any that within the moderator's discretions fall outside mainstream evangelical belief, will be moved to the appropriate area.
Millennialism- post-, pre- a-
Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism, or just your garden variety Zionism.
From the tribulation to the anichrist. Whether your tastes run from Gary DeMar to Tim LaHaye or anywhere in between, your input is welcome here.
OK folks, let's roll!
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
A path to preterism [orthodox].
Collapse
X
-
A path to preterism [orthodox].
. . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV
. . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJVTags: None
-
Read material from that viewpoint with an open mind? I would not be so bold as to say it is the truth, but it makes more sense to me than competing views. I had already ditched pre-trib futurism after reading a work dedicated to defending it before discovering preterism, so I didn't have a firm commitment to any particular view when I did.
Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom
Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostRead material from that viewpoint with an open mind? I would not be so bold as to say it is the truth, but it makes more sense to me than competing views. I had already ditched pre-trib futurism after reading a work dedicated to defending it before discovering preterism, so I didn't have a firm commitment to any particular view when I did.
. . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV
. . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV
Comment
-
I don't get the question. No special thing but trying to let Scripture interpret Scripture and understand the weight of the time texts. Though now, I would hold it as truth even without the time texts but that is the first thing I had to come to grips with.The State. Ideas so good they have to be mandatory.
sigpic
Comment
-
I think one has to keep an open mind regarding there are other possibilities. And do your research. The idea of pre-trib or secret rapture/dispensationalism came into play as a recent development in the mid-late 1800's and has been evolving ever sinceA happy family is but an earlier heaven.
George Bernard Shaw
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dee Dee Warren View PostI don't get the question. No special thing but trying to let Scripture interpret Scripture and understand the weight of the time texts. Though now, I would hold it as truth even without the time texts but that is the first thing I had to come to grips with.. . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV
. . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV
Comment
-
Originally posted by Catholicity View PostI think one has to keep an open mind regarding there are other possibilities. And do your research. The idea of pre-trib or secret rapture/dispensationalism came into play as a recent development in the mid-late 1800's and has been evolving ever since. . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV
. . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dee Dee Warren View PostI think I went on to explain though
I know of former professing Christians leaving the faith, for some of the very same arguments which preterist defined as true. And the preterist view point is in defense of the holy scripture, in that case. I see a reason to hold the preterist view point as opposed to denying the faith.
I had explained the futurist understanding, and you did not take it seriously. But I take it seriously. "this generation" being understood, to be that "generation" which sees the literal post trib signs in the Sun, Moon, and "stars," meteroric showers in the sky.
You understand those events as metaphor. I'm fine with that. But the OT symbology really needs to be step through. I couldn't explain it. I need to connect the dots so to speak.. . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV
. . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ged View PostHas anyone read Kim Riddlebarger where he explains his preference for Ammillenialism over both forms of Preterism?
A case for Ammillenialism (Understanding the End Times)
But here is an overview of that book: http://theologicalstudies.org/files/...ger%5B1%5D.pdf
And the book can be ordered here:
http://www.amazon.com/Case-Amillenni...3580245&sr=1-4
And more about the book here:
http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.c...llennialism-e/. . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV
. . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dee Dee Warren View PostI have written a commentary on it you know.. . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV
. . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV
Comment
-
Originally posted by 37818 View PostWell if it is not the truth, why believe it?Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom
Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by 37818 View PostI will have to read it again. Do you have the HTML to upload here as an attachment?
http://www.preteristsite.com/plain/warrenend.html
I say a version, because it was written very informally and there are grammar errors and some page citations are wrong for the source material which I am discovering as I am editing it for publication. Those errors obviously will be fixed in publication, but the argument remains the same… most changes are stylistic with some source corrections. Once I publish the final version that free version will be pulled down.
I have a podcast as well going through this material at
http://www.preteristpodcast.com. Episode two I think might be the answer to the question you are looking for…. actually episodes 1 and 2.The State. Ideas so good they have to be mandatory.
sigpic
Comment
Comment