Originally posted by Dave L
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Eschatology 201 Guidelines
This area of the forum is primarily for Christian theists to discuss orthodox views of Eschatology. Other theist participation is welcome within that framework, but only within orthodoxy. Posts from nontheists that do not promote atheism or seek to undermine the faith of others will be permitted at the Moderator's discretion - such posters should contact the area moderators before posting.
Without turning this forum into a 'hill of foreskins' (Joshua 5:3), I believe we can still have fun with this 'sensitive' topic.
However, don't be misled, dispensationalism has only partly to do with circumcision issues. So, let's not forget about Innocence, Conscience, Promises, Kingdoms and so on.
End time -isms within orthodox Christianity also discussed here. Clearly unorthodox doctrines, such as those advocating "pantelism/full preterism/Neo-Hymenaeanism" or the denial of any essential of the historic Christian faith are not permitted in this section but can be discussed in Comparative Religions 101 without restriction. Any such threads, as well as any that within the moderator's discretions fall outside mainstream evangelical belief, will be moved to the appropriate area.
Millennialism- post-, pre- a-
Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism, or just your garden variety Zionism.
From the tribulation to the anichrist. Whether your tastes run from Gary DeMar to Tim LaHaye or anywhere in between, your input is welcome here.
OK folks, let's roll!
Forum Rules: Here
Without turning this forum into a 'hill of foreskins' (Joshua 5:3), I believe we can still have fun with this 'sensitive' topic.
However, don't be misled, dispensationalism has only partly to do with circumcision issues. So, let's not forget about Innocence, Conscience, Promises, Kingdoms and so on.
End time -isms within orthodox Christianity also discussed here. Clearly unorthodox doctrines, such as those advocating "pantelism/full preterism/Neo-Hymenaeanism" or the denial of any essential of the historic Christian faith are not permitted in this section but can be discussed in Comparative Religions 101 without restriction. Any such threads, as well as any that within the moderator's discretions fall outside mainstream evangelical belief, will be moved to the appropriate area.
Millennialism- post-, pre- a-
Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism, or just your garden variety Zionism.
From the tribulation to the anichrist. Whether your tastes run from Gary DeMar to Tim LaHaye or anywhere in between, your input is welcome here.
OK folks, let's roll!
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
The Third Temple and Unforgivable Sin.
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Post
Well they are both false teachers and heretics. They don't represent all Christians and certainly not all dispensationalists. How about linking to some credible dispensationalist site that says that Christians will start doing animal sacrifices and build a temple?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave L View Post
Good for you. But it comes with Dispensationalist teaching.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave L View Post
Good for you. But it comes with Dispensationalist teaching.That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave L View Post
It's part of Dispensationalism. Search for it if you don't think so.
Now, how bout getting back to your exegeting Hebrews 6 to back up THOSE claims?The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave L View Post
They represent Dispensationalism, like it or not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
That's not kosher, Dave - if you make a claim, you should be able to back it up.
Now, how bout getting back to your exegeting Hebrews 6 to back up THOSE claims?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave L View PostYou banned links the last time I posted them.
So I say search for yourself to see the proof.
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave L View Post
You banned links the last time I posted them. So I say search for yourself to see the proof.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Post
I just said you can't just post a link as you argument.
Not that you can't use links along with your argument or as giving information when someone asks for it
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave L View Post
You banned links the last time I posted them. So I say search for yourself to see the proof.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Post
I just said you can't just post a link as you argument. Not that you can't use links along with your argument or as giving information when someone asks for it
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave L View Post
https://dispensationalpublishing.com...temple-period/ This will be an eye-opener for you and others. Plenty more proof.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
Comment