Originally posted by rogue06
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Ecclesiology 201 Guidelines
Discussion on matters of general mainstream Christian churches. What are the differences between Catholics and protestants? How has the charismatic movement affected the church? Are Southern baptists different from fundamentalist baptists? It is also for discussions about the nature of the church.
This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and theists. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions. Additionally, there may be some topics that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine that may be more appropriately placed within Comparative Religions 101.
Forum Rules: Here
This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and theists. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions. Additionally, there may be some topics that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine that may be more appropriately placed within Comparative Religions 101.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
The Roman Catholic Church's recent decisions
Collapse
X
-
Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom
Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
-
We need a solid theology of what baptism is and does for such a discussion. In principle, it's difficult to see what good could come of this discussion when going back and forth where one or more parties are credobaptists and would presumably not even see the purpose of such an infant baptism to begin with. Either way, under all orthodox views of baptism I'm aware of, it would not be appropriate to baptize a child who is not going to be raised in the faith.Last edited by KingsGambit; 11-19-2023, 09:31 AM."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostWe need a solid theology of what baptism is and does for such a discussion. In principle, it's difficult to see what good could come of this discussion when going back and forth where one or more parties are credobaptists and would presumably not even see the purpose of such an infant baptism to begin with. Either way, under all orthodox views of baptism I'm aware of, it would not be appropriate to baptize a child who is not going to be raised in the faith.That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bill the Cat View Post
The actual act of baptizing the infant is the last thing I wanted to discuss in this post. I am just, to be honest, disgusted at the RCC's papal approach to LGBT issues, being (what I see as) purposefully nebulous while at the same time being so intently laser focused proclaiming freemasonry off limits.
- 1 like
Comment
-
My grandfather was a Freemason but unsurprisingly, never talked of it. What little I know of it hardly seems compatible with Christianity, so my initial instinct is not to see that as problematic.
I do agree the messaging on homosexuality is ambiguous at best. Catholicity talked with a Spanish professor who said the letter Francis wrote a couple weeks ago was unambiguously orthodox on traditional sexual views if read in Spanish; however, the Vatican itself did authorize an English translation that doesn't give that impression. I'd also agree homosexuality is a more urgent pastoral issue than Freemasonry; far more people are involved, and the Bible actually does mention it specifically."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bill the Cat View PostIn the past few days, 2 separate reports from the Vatican have come out that, I believe, clearly exposes Francis' intent to liberalize the RCC:
More of each article can be read at the citation.
where it says "under the same conditions as the other faithful:
the official Catechism says of Baptism of Adults
"The Baptism of adults
1247 Since the beginning of the Church, adult Baptism is the common practice where the proclamation of the Gospel is still new. The catechumenate (preparation for Baptism) therefore occupies an important place. This initiation into Christian faith and life should dispose the catechumen to receive the gift of God in Baptism, Confirmation, and the Eucharist.
1248 The catechumenate, or formation of catechumens, aims at bringing their conversion and faith to maturity, in response to the divine initiative and in union with an ecclesial community. The catechumenate is to be "a formation in the whole Christian life . . . during which the disciples will be joined to Christ their teacher. The catechumens should be properly initiated into the mystery of salvation and the practice of the evangelical virtues, and they should be introduced into the life of faith, liturgy, and charity of the People of God by successive sacred rites."47"
A happy family is but an earlier heaven.
George Bernard Shaw
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Bill the Cat, 11-16-2023, 08:38 AM
|
20 responses
179 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Catholicity
11-27-2023, 06:18 PM
|
||
Started by One Bad Pig, 10-30-2023, 02:16 PM
|
46 responses
241 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by One Bad Pig
11-05-2023, 06:15 PM
|
Comment