Originally posted by Pentecost
View Post
Originally posted by KingsGambit
View Post
Originally posted by Darth Ovious
View Post
I had in mind that Scripture is inerrant in the original autographs so that if it is an interpolation (as I've been informed somewhere, not quite sure where) then while it may be true, it wouldn't be part of the original autograph and therefore not holy Scripture, at best a reliable account.
KG supported my conclusion but seemed to do so from a more sophisticated standpoint that seemed to make the doctrine of inerrancy irrelevant to whether he believed those verses or not.
Darth Ovious made a point that seemed vague and to sort of ignore us. I'm not sure that was their intention, I coupd have simply misunderstood though.
My question is, where do (possible) interpolations stand in light of your view of Scripture? Whether you're liberal on this matter, or fully hold to the Chicago Statement.
God bless. Please remember the fruit of the Spirit as you post.
Comment