Originally posted by Darth Executor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Christianity 201 Guidelines
orthodox Christians only.
Discussion on matters of general mainstream evangelical Christian theology that do not fit within Theology 201. Have some spiritual gifts ceased today? Is the KJV the only viable translation for the church today? In what sense are the books of the bible inspired and what are those books? Church government? Modern day prophets and apostles?
This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and Christians. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” or "orthodox" for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.
Additionally and rarely, there may be some topics or lines of discussion that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine (in general Christian circles or in the TheologyWeb community) or that deny certain core values that are the Christian convictions of forum leadership that may be more appropriately placed within Unorthodox Theology 201. NO personal offense should be taken by such discretionary decision for none is intended. While inerrancy is NOT considered a requirement for posting in this section, a general respect for the Bible text and a respect for the inerrantist position of others is requested.
The Tweb rules apply here like they do everywhere at Tweb, if you haven't read them, now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
Discussion on matters of general mainstream evangelical Christian theology that do not fit within Theology 201. Have some spiritual gifts ceased today? Is the KJV the only viable translation for the church today? In what sense are the books of the bible inspired and what are those books? Church government? Modern day prophets and apostles?
This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and Christians. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” or "orthodox" for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.
Additionally and rarely, there may be some topics or lines of discussion that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine (in general Christian circles or in the TheologyWeb community) or that deny certain core values that are the Christian convictions of forum leadership that may be more appropriately placed within Unorthodox Theology 201. NO personal offense should be taken by such discretionary decision for none is intended. While inerrancy is NOT considered a requirement for posting in this section, a general respect for the Bible text and a respect for the inerrantist position of others is requested.
The Tweb rules apply here like they do everywhere at Tweb, if you haven't read them, now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Stoning to death in the OT and the situation now after the NT.
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostI imagine that scenario is possible, but to me it's akin to putting a gun to someone's head and forcing them to convert.
Christian's did something like that in the past, and the conversions were halfhearted at best. I think that the longer a person has to live, the more opportunity they have to come to a free will conversion. I realize that you disagree since you've made your disagreement abundantly clear in prior posts."As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:12
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darth Executor View PostHow? The execution is presumably for some heinous crime, it's not a conversion tool in and of itself.
My point was that having time, in and of itself, does not translate to conversion opportunities.
Without data it's a meaningless argument that could swing either way.
Yes, and IIRC I cited last words for executed prisoners and the bulk of them expressed faith in God.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostSeems more likely to me that a Capital Punishment conversion would be based out of fear, rather than love or true loyalty. That isn't to say I think no genuine conversions come from fear of death, but in the long run I question the free will element that comes purely from a fear-based commitment to Christ. If you are unable to comprehend that, I don't think it's something I can explain.
I disagree. I think the more time available to someone, the more opportunity awaits.
I don't remember that, but at any rate, I don't doubt that a desperate man might express any number of things when it comes down to the wire. Confessing with one's mouth is one thing, believing in one's heart is another."As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:12
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darth Executor View PostFree will has nothing to do with fear.
Converting out of fear is no less a free will conversion than converting out of feelgood.
Also, plenty of people who aren't on death row feign Christianity to show they've reformed to the point of parody, so sparing someone the death penalty can and does have the same effect you complain about.
You're not the least bit concerned it could have the opposite effect?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darth Executor View PostIt's not irrelevant, and He wasn't "asked His opinion", they were trying to get Him to break Roman law:
If Jesus consented to the execution, He broke Roman law. If He didn't, He broke Jewish law.
So Jesus came up with a way to avoid doing either. What you are saying is that we shouldn't lawfully execute adulterers because Jesus didn't lynch a woman.
Not disputed. Also not relevant to whether we should execute adulterers."What has the Church gained if it is popular, but there is no conviction, no repentance, no power?" - A.W. Tozer
"... there are two parties in Washington, the stupid party and the evil party, who occasionally get together and do something both stupid and evil, and this is called bipartisanship." - Everett Dirksen
Comment
-
Originally posted by Littlejoe View PostIf He has no authority, then how could He break any law? That's why it's irrelevant.
Right, they were trying to get Him to render an opinion that they could use against Him. But, if He had no authority to execute someone, it was an accusation against His beliefs.Well...technically, He agreed that she could be stoned, but stipulated that those without sin should start it.
So, we shouldn't use Christ's examples when possible?Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom
Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostIt's not irrelevant, because he could be portrayed as advocating breaking a law.
Shouldn't we take care not to take Christ's examples out of context?"What has the Church gained if it is popular, but there is no conviction, no repentance, no power?" - A.W. Tozer
"... there are two parties in Washington, the stupid party and the evil party, who occasionally get together and do something both stupid and evil, and this is called bipartisanship." - Everett Dirksen
Comment
-
In terms of the stipulation that Christ gives where he says "He is without sin cast the first stone", it does seem that Christ is saying to the Pharisee's to look in the mirror. We do have verses in the bible which go along with this thought.
Mat 7:1-5 - “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye."“I didn’t go to religion to make me happy. I always knew a bottle of Port would do that. If you want a religion to make you feel really comfortable, I certainly don’t recommend Christianity.” - C.S. Lewis
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostI imagine that scenario is possible, but to me it's akin to putting a gun to someone's head and forcing them to convert. Christian's did something like that in the past, and the conversions were halfhearted at best. I think that the longer a person has to live, the more opportunity they have to come to a free will conversion. I realize that you disagree since you've made your disagreement abundantly clear in prior posts.Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Littlejoe View PostBut DE's point was he had no authority to put someone to death. That point is irrelevant. You are agreeing with my position it seems?
certainly...how am I taking it out of context?
As we are not under the Mosaic Covenant, we are not obligated to enforce its penalty for breaking it. The Church's remedy is loss of communion with the offending party, with the goal of eventual restoration of communion.Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom
Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostNo, the point is highly relevant.
LJ: but if Christ did not condone the stoning of the Woman caught in adultery, neither should we.
DE: Christ had no legal authority to execute her.
How is Christ's legal authority related to His condoning the stoning since neither did the Pharisees have the authority.
Well, I was speaking in general; before saying we should do what Jesus did, we should see why Jesus did what He did. In this instance, Jesus was constrained politically from openly advocating stoning her or taking part in doing so. On the other hand, the Law clearly mandated stoning for adultery. On the other other hand, Jesus uniquely has the power to forgive.
As we are not under the Mosaic Covenant, we are not obligated to enforce its penalty for breaking it. The Church's remedy is loss of communion with the offending party, with the goal of eventual restoration of communion."What has the Church gained if it is popular, but there is no conviction, no repentance, no power?" - A.W. Tozer
"... there are two parties in Washington, the stupid party and the evil party, who occasionally get together and do something both stupid and evil, and this is called bipartisanship." - Everett Dirksen
Comment
-
Originally posted by Littlejoe View PostIf He has no authority, then how could He break any law? That's why it's irrelevant.
Right, they were trying to get Him to render an opinion that they could use against Him. But, if He had no authority to execute someone, it was an accusation against His beliefs.
Well...technically, He agreed that she could be stoned, but stipulated that those without sin should start it.
So, we shouldn't use Christ's examples when possible?Last edited by Darth Executor; 05-11-2015, 06:18 PM."As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:12
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Littlejoe View PostI truly do not see the relevance. Perhaps you can explain it to me."As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:12
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jedidiah View PostThe two are not even close. The man being executed will not save his life by converting. His only relationship in this case is God.
At any rate, though I don't think it's out of the question that a man can truly repent and make Jesus Lord with their neck on the chopping block, I believe it's more likely that a man will come to a saving knowledge of the truth, and a fearless and perfected love (1 John 4:18) when they don't have the goad of a noose swinging in front of them. Again, I understand that is an unpopular view among American Christians, and I fully realize that my view on the matter is in the minority. I don't think the arguments for capital punishment are totally unreasonable, I simply do not agree that the ends justify the means.Last edited by Adrift; 05-11-2015, 07:01 PM.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Thoughtful Monk, 04-14-2024, 04:34 PM
|
4 responses
35 views
0 likes
|
Last Post 04-16-2024, 03:47 PM | ||
Started by One Bad Pig, 04-10-2024, 12:35 PM
|
0 responses
27 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by One Bad Pig
04-10-2024, 12:35 PM
|
||
Started by Thoughtful Monk, 03-15-2024, 06:19 PM
|
35 responses
179 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
03-27-2024, 08:28 AM
|
||
Started by NorrinRadd, 04-13-2022, 12:54 AM
|
45 responses
339 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by NorrinRadd
04-12-2024, 04:35 PM
|
||
Started by Zymologist, 07-09-2019, 01:18 PM
|
354 responses
17,224 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Yesterday, 02:01 PM
|
Comment