Announcement

Collapse

Christianity 201 Guidelines

orthodox Christians only.

Discussion on matters of general mainstream evangelical Christian theology that do not fit within Theology 201. Have some spiritual gifts ceased today? Is the KJV the only viable translation for the church today? In what sense are the books of the bible inspired and what are those books? Church government? Modern day prophets and apostles?

This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and Christians. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” or "orthodox" for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.

Additionally and rarely, there may be some topics or lines of discussion that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine (in general Christian circles or in the TheologyWeb community) or that deny certain core values that are the Christian convictions of forum leadership that may be more appropriately placed within Unorthodox Theology 201. NO personal offense should be taken by such discretionary decision for none is intended. While inerrancy is NOT considered a requirement for posting in this section, a general respect for the Bible text and a respect for the inerrantist position of others is requested.

The Tweb rules apply here like they do everywhere at Tweb, if you haven't read them, now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Israel and The State of Israel are not the same thing.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sparko
    replied
    Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
    OK, so you're pretty definitively a supersessionist, given that you've attempted no theological defense of the nation-state of Israel, you seem to be consistent in that.

    That having been said, Leonhard raises a worthwhile point in that it's easier to see Christianity as replacing Judaism, particularly the Judaism that existed in the time of Christ, if we have concrete ways in which we maintain that Jewish legacy.

    Also worthy of note in any discussion of modern Judaism is the fact that it is descended from the synagogue-centric tradition (identified, iirc, with the pharisees), since the the temple-centered saducees couldn't maintain their practices after the Romans destroyed the Temple.
    Um, what?

    But yeah, it's kinda hard to keep the old covenant if they don't actually keep it, which would include sacrifices. Any way you look at it, they are not following the mosaic law, and they don't have Jesus as their savior, so they are pretty much in the same boat as any other unbeliever.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paprika
    replied
    Originally posted by Sparko View Post
    I think the Mosaic Law went away when Jesus was crucified.
    On that premise, do the Israelis have any special God-given right to the land?

    Leave a comment:


  • KingsGambit
    replied
    Wasn't the land promise to Israel contingent upon a nationwide faithful following of the Mosaic law? I think it would be difficult to argue that this condition has been fulfilled.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spartacus
    replied
    Pap, would you be satisfied by the formulation that Jews are obligated to follow the Old Covenant insofar as they are reasonably able to?

    Leave a comment:


  • Spartacus
    replied
    Originally posted by Sparko View Post
    I think the Mosaic Law went away when Jesus was crucified. The Israelites had broken the covenant over and over and over and over again. By their own doing, it was null and void, even though God kept it in place until Jesus came and fulfilled it. So I don't think there is any mosaic law for the Jews to follow today. They either have to accept Jesus, or be treated like any other non-believer.
    OK, so you're pretty definitively a supersessionist, given that you've attempted no theological defense of the nation-state of Israel, you seem to be consistent in that.

    That having been said, Leonhard raises a worthwhile point in that it's easier to see Christianity as replacing Judaism, particularly the Judaism that existed in the time of Christ, if we have concrete ways in which we maintain that Jewish legacy.

    Also worthy of note in any discussion of modern Judaism is the fact that it is descended from the synagogue-centric tradition (identified, iirc, with the pharisees), since the the temple-centered saducees couldn't maintain their practices after the Romans destroyed the Temple.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jedidiah
    replied
    What I am asking is in fact; What constitutes a "legitimate" Israel in your opinion? How does the modern version fail that definition?

    Leave a comment:


  • Leonhard
    replied
    Originally posted by Jedidiah View Post
    How are unbelieving Jews today any less Israel than were the largely rebellious and God rejecting Jews of much of the Old Testament revelations?
    In what way are they like the Jews at the time of Jesus?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jedidiah
    replied
    How are unbelieving Jews today any less Israel than were the largely rebellious and God rejecting Jews of much of the Old Testament revelations?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sparko
    replied
    Originally posted by Paprika View Post
    Was not the Mosaic Law still binding on them when they went into exile?
    I think the Mosaic Law went away when Jesus was crucified. The Israelites had broken the covenant over and over and over and over again. By their own doing, it was null and void, even though God kept it in place until Jesus came and fulfilled it. So I don't think there is any mosaic law for the Jews to follow today. They either have to accept Jesus, or be treated like any other non-believer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paprika
    replied
    Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
    You consider the Old Covenant binding on them, yet refuse them the means to live it out?
    Was not the Mosaic Law still binding on them when they went into exile?

    Leave a comment:


  • Leonhard
    replied
    Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
    The most defensible (i.e. not based on niche readings of apocalyptic texts) theological endorsement of the modern state of Israel is predicated on a rejection of supersessionism-- that is, it depends on the belief that the New Covenant did not render the Old entirely null and void from then on. For what it's worth, the Second Vatican Council, in the document Nostra Aetate, cited Romans 11:28-29 as support for a rejection of supersessionism, though it is not immediately clear, even from a Catholic perspective, whether there are limits to the covenant's staying power with respect to certain grants or stipulations.
    Whenever The Catholic Church talks about Zion, about Israel today, in the real theological context, its as a reference to The Church. The country occupied by modern post-temple Judaism does not apply. I don't think Nostra Aetate does much to change this, aside from affirming that anti-semitism is bad, and that the The Church should foster more positive relationship with modern jews, and put more of an emphasis on the handover of rituals from temple-judaism, which makes sense given the context of the celebration of mass, and the vestment worn by priests, etc...

    Leave a comment:


  • Spartacus
    replied
    You consider the Old Covenant binding on them, yet refuse them the means to live it out?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paprika
    replied
    Originally posted by Leonhard View Post
    The country the jews are currently referring to as 'Israel' is not Israel. No Christian ought to support The State of Israel, thinking he's thereby taking part in fulfilling a commandment of God.
    On further thought, an line of thought suggests itself: from a 'supersessionist' point of view, the Israelis have rejected their Messiah and God. Without His blessing, they attempt to hold onto the Promised Land by force.

    Is this not folly?

    Leave a comment:


  • One Bad Pig
    replied
    Originally posted by Leonhard View Post
    The country the jews are currently referring to as 'Israel' is not Israel. No Christian ought to support The State of Israel, thinking he's thereby taking part in fulfilling a commandment of God.

    The State of Israel certainly does not support Christians. They'll take our tourist dollars, but AFAIR Jewish Christians are not considered Jews for the purpose of moving to Israel, the Palestinian Christians are treated no better than the Arabs, and Christian archeological finds in Jerusalem are paved over once the archeologists have some time to poke around instead of being restored like Jewish archeological finds.

    Leave a comment:


  • KingsGambit
    replied
    Originally posted by Truthseeker View Post
    Yes, Israel and its government are not the same, but we should not ever lose sight of that the people support the government on the whole. The Sabra and Shatila massacre scandal in 1982 did not topple the government. Even if the government does more evil, I doubt there would be rebellion.
    Not only that, but the borders of the modern day nation of Israel are nothing close to what the nation was defined as in the Bible.

    Leave a comment:

Related Threads

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by Thoughtful Monk, 03-15-2024, 06:19 PM
35 responses
166 views
0 likes
Last Post Cow Poke  
Started by KingsGambit, 03-15-2024, 02:12 PM
4 responses
49 views
0 likes
Last Post Thoughtful Monk  
Started by Chaotic Void, 03-08-2024, 07:36 AM
10 responses
119 views
1 like
Last Post mikewhitney  
Started by Cow Poke, 02-29-2024, 07:55 AM
14 responses
71 views
3 likes
Last Post Cow Poke  
Started by Cow Poke, 02-28-2024, 11:56 AM
13 responses
59 views
0 likes
Last Post Cow Poke  
Working...
X