Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Christianity 201 Guidelines
orthodox Christians only.
Discussion on matters of general mainstream evangelical Christian theology that do not fit within Theology 201. Have some spiritual gifts ceased today? Is the KJV the only viable translation for the church today? In what sense are the books of the bible inspired and what are those books? Church government? Modern day prophets and apostles?
This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and Christians. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” or "orthodox" for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.
Additionally and rarely, there may be some topics or lines of discussion that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine (in general Christian circles or in the TheologyWeb community) or that deny certain core values that are the Christian convictions of forum leadership that may be more appropriately placed within Unorthodox Theology 201. NO personal offense should be taken by such discretionary decision for none is intended. While inerrancy is NOT considered a requirement for posting in this section, a general respect for the Bible text and a respect for the inerrantist position of others is requested.
The Tweb rules apply here like they do everywhere at Tweb, if you haven't read them, now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
Discussion on matters of general mainstream evangelical Christian theology that do not fit within Theology 201. Have some spiritual gifts ceased today? Is the KJV the only viable translation for the church today? In what sense are the books of the bible inspired and what are those books? Church government? Modern day prophets and apostles?
This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and Christians. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” or "orthodox" for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.
Additionally and rarely, there may be some topics or lines of discussion that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine (in general Christian circles or in the TheologyWeb community) or that deny certain core values that are the Christian convictions of forum leadership that may be more appropriately placed within Unorthodox Theology 201. NO personal offense should be taken by such discretionary decision for none is intended. While inerrancy is NOT considered a requirement for posting in this section, a general respect for the Bible text and a respect for the inerrantist position of others is requested.
The Tweb rules apply here like they do everywhere at Tweb, if you haven't read them, now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Universalism
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostIf the punishment is eternal then they are not getting out.
And regarding Sodom, God says he will restore the city/nation, not the sinful people whom he destroyed and he is speaking poetically about restoring nations after the end times.
"Bear your disgrace, for you have furnished some justification for your sisters. Because your sins were more vile than theirs, they appear more righteous than you. So then, be ashamed and bear your disgrace, for you have made your sisters appear righteous. However, I will restore the fortunes of Sodom and her daughters and of Samaria and her daughters, and your fortunes along with them..." (Eze 16:52–53)
"Your sins", "theirs", "they appear more righteous", this is talking about inhabitants of Jerusalem and Sodom.
Blessings,
Lee
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lee_merrill View PostDid I not say I see three threads in Scripture?
No, it says they will depart into the eternal fire, into eternal punishment. Then I quoted Ezekiel 16:53 along with Jude 7, where God says people that are examples of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire will be restored.
Blessings,
Lee
And regarding Sodom, God says he will restore the city/nation, not the sinful people whom he destroyed and he is speaking poetically about restoring nations after the end times. You should be careful trying to cherry pick a difficult poetic verse and using it to counteract a clear and concise verse.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostNo we have been quoting scripture in context, not ignoring anything. YOU have been quoting scripture out of context and ignoring other scripture that flatly says your ideas on universalism are wrong.
I have taken the scriptures you presented and quoted the scriptures around it, showing you to be wrong. You quoted just the part about the fire prepared for the devil and ignored the part right after it that said the unsaved people will be tossed into the same fire for ETERNITY.
Blessings,
LeeLast edited by lee_merrill; 09-23-2019, 02:55 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lee_merrill View PostI'm quoting Scripture, actually! You all are the ones ignoring the Scriptures that I present, you are not addressing the points that I make. And I agree that there is a case to be made for eternal punishment, as there is a valid Scriptural case to be made for annihilationism, as there is a case for God all in all.
I believe that eternity will be surprising! All these threads being true, as in the cross, which no one expected, and even seemingly contradictory, with perfect love and perfect justice expressed.
Blessings,
Lee
I have taken the scriptures you presented and quoted the scriptures around it, showing you to be wrong. You quoted just the part about the fire prepared for the devil and ignored the part right after it that said the unsaved people will be tossed into the same fire for ETERNITY.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by hedrick View PostIt's odd that this thread has more about homosexuality than the Scriptures that point to universal salvation. I actually have a problem with universalism, because I think it's hard to make that consistent with Jesus' teaching. On the other hand, we might want to consider ways to do so, because I think Paul is universalist or close.
One of the most explicit descriptions of judgement is 1 Cor 15:23-28. It's hard to avoid understanding the "all" here universally, since Jesus' salvation is paralleled to sin's entrance through Adam. Christians rise first. Then the "powers", including death are defeated. Then everyone joins Christ. That subjection here is a positive thing is clear by verse 28, where the Son is subject to the Father. There are plenty of attempts to understand this another way, but they're pretty clearly attempts at evasion, not actual exegesis.
Part of the issue with this passage is that it make an assumption that is antithetical to American concepts of individualism and free will. It assumes that evil and death are powers that enslave us. Hence once they are destroyed, all are joined to Christ.
The one hope I see here to avoid universalism is to assume that some people are so identified with the "powers" that they are destroyed with it. I actually think that is a possibility. But the tone of this passage doesn't suggest that this is most people, as many Christians seem to assume.
Although less explicit, there are other universalistic passages in Paul, e.g. Philip 2:9-11 or Rom 5:18. Again, the parallelism with Adam makes it clear that in Rom 5 all are included, absent fancy exegetical footwork.
1 Cor 15 does indicate a difference between the treatment of those who are in Christ and those who aren't.
1 Timothy 6:16's mention that only God has immortality seems to suggest that Paul was not a universalist as well.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostYou are just ignoring scripture for your own feelings about something. That is a dangerous theology Lee. It is how many a person has gotten off of the righteous path. I made a determination long ago when I was a young Christian who found many things in the bible that I didn't like, that when my wishes and feelings contradicted what the bible said, I would go with the bible instead of my self-centered wishes.
You need to stop "hoping" and believe what the bible is telling you. Not digging through the bible finding bits and pieces that reinforce your preconceptions. That is called EISOGESIS, reading INTO the text instead of EXOGESES, taking meaning from the text.
I would love to be a univeralist. However when I read the Scriptures, I can't hold that position. It really bothers me that people will spend eternity separated from God. I have to accept the reality that it's God's way and not my way.
Leave a comment:
-
It's odd that this thread has more about homosexuality than the Scriptures that point to universal salvation. I actually have a problem with universalism, because I think it's hard to make that consistent with Jesus' teaching. On the other hand, we might want to consider ways to do so, because I think Paul is universalist or close.
One of the most explicit descriptions of judgement is 1 Cor 15:23-28. It's hard to avoid understanding the "all" here universally, since Jesus' salvation is paralleled to sin's entrance through Adam. Christians rise first. Then the "powers", including death are defeated. Then everyone joins Christ. That subjection here is a positive thing is clear by verse 28, where the Son is subject to the Father. There are plenty of attempts to understand this another way, but they're pretty clearly attempts at evasion, not actual exegesis.
Part of the issue with this passage is that it make an assumption that is antithetical to American concepts of individualism and free will. It assumes that evil and death are powers that enslave us. Hence once they are destroyed, all are joined to Christ.
The one hope I see here to avoid universalism is to assume that some people are so identified with the "powers" that they are destroyed with it. I actually think that is a possibility. But the tone of this passage doesn't suggest that this is most people, as many Christians seem to assume.
Although less explicit, there are other universalistic passages in Paul, e.g. Philip 2:9-11 or Rom 5:18. Again, the parallelism with Adam makes it clear that in Rom 5 all are included, absent fancy exegetical footwork.
1 Cor 15 does indicate a difference between the treatment of those who are in Christ and those who aren't.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lee_merrill View PostI'm quoting Scripture, actually!
His first attempt was "So Judas threw the money into the temple and left. Then he went away and hanged himself". (Matt 27:5 NIV)
OK, that couldn't be it, let's try again...
His second attempt was ""Go and do likewise." (Luke 10:37)
OK, third time's a charm.... ""What you are about to do, do quickly." (John 13:27)
Don't hang yourself, brother.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostYou are just ignoring scripture for your own feelings about something.
I believe that eternity will be surprising! All these threads being true, as in the cross, which no one expected, and even seemingly contradictory, with perfect love and perfect justice expressed.
Blessings,
Lee
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lee_merrill View PostI agree, yet there still seems to be a glimmer of hope even here, with hell being prepared for others. Let us also remember that Sodom will be restored, the very example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire (Jude 7).
Blessings,
Lee
You need to stop "hoping" and believe what the bible is telling you. Not digging through the bible finding bits and pieces that reinforce your preconceptions. That is called EISOGESIS, reading INTO the text instead of EXOGESES, taking meaning from the text.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostIf you actually read beyond your cherry-picked verse in Matthew 25 where he says the eternal fire was prepared for the devil, he says those on his left will be cast into that fire and suffer ETERNAL Punishment.
Blessings,
Lee
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostIf you actually read beyond your cherry-picked verse in Matthew 25 where he says the eternal fire was prepared for the devil, he says those on his left will be cast into that fire and suffer ETERNAL Punishment.
--
41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’
44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’
46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”
And the word "eternal" is used to describe the fire, how long the people tossed there will be punished and how long the righteous will live. So if it is temporary, then so is heaven.
So yeah, you should take them all together and combine what they say, but you aren't doing that. You are cherry picking what you want to see, and handwaving away inconvenient verses.
I gave the same explanation of that passage earlier in this thread, but Lee either didn't see it or he ignored it. I even said that the same word for "eternal" in the original text was used in both cases.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lee_merrill View PostWell, one verse is not erased by other verses, we have to take them all together, and combine what they say.
Blessings,
Lee
--
41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’
44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’
46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”
And the word "eternal" is used to describe the fire, how long the people tossed there will be punished and how long the righteous will live. So if it is temporary, then so is heaven.
So yeah, you should take them all together and combine what they say, but you aren't doing that. You are cherry picking what you want to see, and handwaving away inconvenient verses.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Christian3 View PostThat is not what the Scriptures I cited say.
Blessings,
Lee
Leave a comment:
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Thoughtful Monk, 04-14-2024, 04:34 PM
|
4 responses
33 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Yesterday, 03:47 PM | ||
Started by One Bad Pig, 04-10-2024, 12:35 PM
|
0 responses
27 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by One Bad Pig
04-10-2024, 12:35 PM
|
||
Started by Thoughtful Monk, 03-15-2024, 06:19 PM
|
35 responses
178 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
03-27-2024, 08:28 AM
|
||
Started by NorrinRadd, 04-13-2022, 12:54 AM
|
45 responses
338 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by NorrinRadd
04-12-2024, 04:35 PM
|
||
Started by Zymologist, 07-09-2019, 01:18 PM
|
345 responses
17,173 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Ronson
Today, 07:38 PM
|
Leave a comment: