Announcement

Collapse

Christianity 201 Guidelines

orthodox Christians only.

Discussion on matters of general mainstream evangelical Christian theology that do not fit within Theology 201. Have some spiritual gifts ceased today? Is the KJV the only viable translation for the church today? In what sense are the books of the bible inspired and what are those books? Church government? Modern day prophets and apostles?

This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and Christians. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” or "orthodox" for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.

Additionally and rarely, there may be some topics or lines of discussion that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine (in general Christian circles or in the TheologyWeb community) or that deny certain core values that are the Christian convictions of forum leadership that may be more appropriately placed within Unorthodox Theology 201. NO personal offense should be taken by such discretionary decision for none is intended. While inerrancy is NOT considered a requirement for posting in this section, a general respect for the Bible text and a respect for the inerrantist position of others is requested.

The Tweb rules apply here like they do everywhere at Tweb, if you haven't read them, now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Universalism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • KingsGambit
    replied
    Universalists are very good at philosophy, mainly because they are very bad at scripture interpretation. There are some verses and concepts you can take out of context to make an argument for universalism, but Jesus made perfectly clear that some will not be saved. Also note Hebrews 3:11: "They will never enter my rest."

    I don't think there's anything wrong with hoping everybody will be saved, because 2 Peter 3:9 says the same thing. But when you outright say that it will happen, it becomes a problem.

    (This is a very hot topic right now in theology because David Bentley Hart's much anticipated book arguing for universalism is coming out this fall... so I expect to be hearing more discussion about universalism online.)

    Edit: Literally two minutes after I posted, I saw that a friend of mine just posted on FB that he is going to publish a critical review of Hart's book in a theological journal. Talk about coincidences.
    Last edited by KingsGambit; 09-11-2019, 12:05 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Christianbookworm
    replied
    What about people who don't want to be saved? One person's utopia is another person's dystopia....

    Leave a comment:


  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Originally posted by Christian3 View Post
    United Methodist.

    However, perhaps this particular church needs people like me to challenge what they preach!?
    I wish that there was hope in that regard, but when a church goes down the path of embracing homosexuality, especially at the behest of their denomination, there is no going back.

    Leave a comment:


  • mossrose
    replied
    Originally posted by Christian3 View Post
    United Methodist.

    However, perhaps this particular church needs people like me to challenge what they preach!?
    You said you've already challenged some things, and nothing has changed. There comes a time to shake the dust off your feet and move on if your efforts to show error are not accepted.

    Leave a comment:


  • Christian3
    replied
    Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
    Our Methodist "guest pastor" sermon on the radio this past Sunday morning was the parable of the Good Samaritan, and how that was a lesson for us to be kinder and more accepting of the "LBGTQ-plus community". And that's how the guest pastor pronounced it numerous times - kinda slowing down and very clearly enunciating "L B G T Q Plus community". He explained that his 'sexual orientation' gave him greater insight into the scriptures than his colleagues.
    Methodist again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Christian3
    replied
    Originally posted by Sparko View Post
    maybe its time to find a new church. What denomination is it?
    United Methodist.

    However, perhaps this particular church needs people like me to challenge what they preach!?

    Leave a comment:


  • Leonhard
    replied
    Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
    You have a herd? Of.... those green things with yellow wigs?
    I can't be in a herd, I'm in a flock.

    Leave a comment:


  • mossrose
    replied
    Originally posted by Bill the Cat View Post
    While speaking at Grace Cathedral—an Episcopal church in San Francisco—he was directly asked about his stance on gay marriage and he offered the following response:

    “I am for marriage. I am for fidelity. I am for love, whether it’s a man and woman, a woman and a woman, a man and a man. I think the ship has sailed and I think the church needs — I think this is the world we are living in and we need to affirm people wherever they are.”

    IMG_1129.JPG

    Leave a comment:


  • Bill the Cat
    replied
    Originally posted by Christian3 View Post
    Tell me more. My church wanted to be able to marry homosexuals.
    While speaking at Grace Cathedral—an Episcopal church in San Francisco—he was directly asked about his stance on gay marriage and he offered the following response:

    “I am for marriage. I am for fidelity. I am for love, whether it’s a man and woman, a woman and a woman, a man and a man. I think the ship has sailed and I think the church needs — I think this is the world we are living in and we need to affirm people wherever they are.”

    Leave a comment:


  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Originally posted by Christian3 View Post
    Tell me more. My church wanted to be able to marry homosexuals.
    Our Methodist "guest pastor" sermon on the radio this past Sunday morning was the parable of the Good Samaritan, and how that was a lesson for us to be kinder and more accepting of the "LBGTQ-plus community". And that's how the guest pastor pronounced it numerous times - kinda slowing down and very clearly enunciating "L B G T Q Plus community". He explained that his 'sexual orientation' gave him greater insight into the scriptures than his colleagues.

    Leave a comment:


  • mossrose
    replied
    Originally posted by Christian3 View Post
    Tell me more. My church wanted to be able to marry homosexuals.
    You need to find a different church.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sparko
    replied
    Originally posted by Christian3 View Post
    Tell me more. My church wanted to be able to marry homosexuals.
    maybe its time to find a new church. What denomination is it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Christian3
    replied
    Originally posted by mossrose View Post
    I wouldn't trust anything Rob Bell writes.

    And if someone were teaching something that he wrote I would be gone.
    I understand that Bell lost 3,000 members of his church over this book, "Love Wins."

    Leave a comment:


  • Christian3
    replied
    Originally posted by Bill the Cat View Post
    No. Rob Bell wrote that book to excuse practicing homosexuals of their sin.
    Tell me more. My church wanted to be able to marry homosexuals.

    Leave a comment:


  • Christian3
    replied
    Originally posted by Leonhard View Post
    Some part of me wishes that universalism was true. My heard knows it is not.
    Yeah. It would stop me worrying about some of my friends and family members who are not believers.

    Leave a comment:

Related Threads

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by Thoughtful Monk, 04-14-2024, 04:34 PM
4 responses
33 views
0 likes
Last Post Christianbookworm  
Started by One Bad Pig, 04-10-2024, 12:35 PM
0 responses
27 views
1 like
Last Post One Bad Pig  
Started by Thoughtful Monk, 03-15-2024, 06:19 PM
35 responses
178 views
0 likes
Last Post Cow Poke  
Started by NorrinRadd, 04-13-2022, 12:54 AM
45 responses
338 views
0 likes
Last Post NorrinRadd  
Started by Zymologist, 07-09-2019, 01:18 PM
345 responses
17,173 views
0 likes
Last Post Ronson
by Ronson
 
Working...
X