Originally posted by Adrift
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Christianity 201 Guidelines
orthodox Christians only.
Discussion on matters of general mainstream evangelical Christian theology that do not fit within Theology 201. Have some spiritual gifts ceased today? Is the KJV the only viable translation for the church today? In what sense are the books of the bible inspired and what are those books? Church government? Modern day prophets and apostles?
This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and Christians. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” or "orthodox" for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.
Additionally and rarely, there may be some topics or lines of discussion that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine (in general Christian circles or in the TheologyWeb community) or that deny certain core values that are the Christian convictions of forum leadership that may be more appropriately placed within Unorthodox Theology 201. NO personal offense should be taken by such discretionary decision for none is intended. While inerrancy is NOT considered a requirement for posting in this section, a general respect for the Bible text and a respect for the inerrantist position of others is requested.
The Tweb rules apply here like they do everywhere at Tweb, if you haven't read them, now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
Discussion on matters of general mainstream evangelical Christian theology that do not fit within Theology 201. Have some spiritual gifts ceased today? Is the KJV the only viable translation for the church today? In what sense are the books of the bible inspired and what are those books? Church government? Modern day prophets and apostles?
This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and Christians. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” or "orthodox" for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.
Additionally and rarely, there may be some topics or lines of discussion that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine (in general Christian circles or in the TheologyWeb community) or that deny certain core values that are the Christian convictions of forum leadership that may be more appropriately placed within Unorthodox Theology 201. NO personal offense should be taken by such discretionary decision for none is intended. While inerrancy is NOT considered a requirement for posting in this section, a general respect for the Bible text and a respect for the inerrantist position of others is requested.
The Tweb rules apply here like they do everywhere at Tweb, if you haven't read them, now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Christians and Trump--two perspectives
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostPersonally, I think Trump savors all the attention, good or bad, and he particularly likes sticking his thumb in the eye of his opponents.
In one of our HR classes (continuing education) there was a lady who was explaining various personalities in the workplace.
She talked about "Bitter Betty" who always complains, always keeps things stirred up, always has a negative attitude. Then she asked, "why do you think Betty is Bitter like that?"
Various members of the class tried to explain that maybe Betty has a bad home life, or has had a bad experience at work, she's hurting, or blah blah blah....
The instructor smiled real big, and yelled, "NO --- She's like that because IT WORKS!!!!! As long as she is like that, nobody is going to ask her to do extra projects, or seek her help --- everybody is going to steer clear of her...."
I think Trump is like that because IT WORKS!!!
He controls the agenda. He drives people crazy. He makes otherwise good people into attack agents either for him or against him. IT WORKS!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Timothy View PostThanks, that means a lot. But don't they seem strangely silent? Teallaura is convinced that the only reason a Christian would not support Trump is because we are secretly baby killers. Where did everything go wrong?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostI think this is unfair. This logic assumes that support or opposition for a candidate equates to full opposition or support for their slate of policies. Personally, I think Trump is unfit for office, is likely mentally deteriorating, and for the good of the republic should be replaced, preferrably via primary challenge... But I would have no time for being slandered as "pro abort".
I'm not sure how effective it is, but I get what she's attempting to do. I don't think she really thinks that if you're anti-Trump you're really pro-abortion.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostI thought that was a lot of hand-wringing over nothing as I explain here: http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...l=1#post663954
In one of our HR classes (continuing education) there was a lady who was explaining various personalities in the workplace.
She talked about "Bitter Betty" who always complains, always keeps things stirred up, always has a negative attitude. Then she asked, "why do you think Betty is Bitter like that?"
Various members of the class tried to explain that maybe Betty has a bad home life, or has had a bad experience at work, she's hurting, or blah blah blah....
The instructor smiled real big, and yelled, "NO --- She's like that because IT WORKS!!!!! As long as she is like that, nobody is going to ask her to do extra projects, or seek her help --- everybody is going to steer clear of her...."
I think Trump is like that because IT WORKS!!!
He controls the agenda. He drives people crazy. He makes otherwise good people into attack agents either for him or against him. IT WORKS!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostI think it's more than that. Look at the vigor with which his blasphemy about being compared to the second coming of Christ was defended on here by several posters. (Dr. Michael Brown, who acknowledged he will continue to vote for Trump, pointed out that the biblical response to being compared to a god is to rend one's clothing and set the record straight.) If you don't really support Trump that much, why would you stick your neck out on a a Christian forum for that one?I thought that was a lot of hand-wringing over nothing as I explain here: http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...l=1#post663954
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Timothy View PostSee, the Thing is...
I haven't been bearing false witness.
But you believe Teallaura, do you actually believe that I have been killing children without my knowledge? Perhaps you think I have been busy while sleepwalking
But if you and Teal have ANY proof that I kill children, please be a dear and share it. Perhaps you and Teal are the real killers and you are trying to frame me in order to throw the FBI off of your bloody crime spree.There's the wink so you know I am just joking with you! (or AM I???
)
Why don't you just shut up about me, since you know literally nothing about me other than I believe that the alternative to voting for Trump is NOT voting for Trump. Which it literally is.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostSays the guy who has been bearing false witness repeatedly here, driven by his hatred of Trump.
I haven't been bearing false witness.
But you believe Teallaura, do you actually believe that I have been killing children without my knowledge? Perhaps you think I have been busy while sleepwalking
But if you and Teal have ANY proof that I kill children, please be a dear and share it. Perhaps you and Teal are the real killers and you are trying to frame me in order to throw the FBI off of your bloody crime spree.There's the wink so you know I am just joking with you! (or AM I???
)
Why don't you just shut up about me, since you know literally nothing about me other than I believe that the alternative to voting for Trump is NOT voting for Trump. Which it literally is.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostBe careful where you're going. Jesus often refused to give simple answers to questions.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostYou're not the only Christian who isn't all in for Trump.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Teallaura View PostWe're tired of your self righteous indignation when no one accepts your two year old level rationale.
I'm tired of pro-abortion supporters masquerading as evangelical Christians - and don't bother denying it. Only pro-aborts like you want to take down Trump, knowing he's appointing conservatives to the judiciary - and the High Court itself.
Christians shouldn't support child murder. But you do.
That is literally insane. Go to God and repent of bearing false witness.
How can you say I support child murder? Don't you have any conscience left?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostI think this is unfair. This logic assumes that support or opposition for a candidate equates to full opposition or support for their slate of policies. Personally, I think Trump is unfit for office, is likely mentally deteriorating, and for the good of the republic should be replaced, preferrably via primary challenge... But I would have no time for being slandered as "pro abort".
YOU didn't spend four pages insisting that any support for Trump is unchristian - and support FOR immorality - now did you?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Timothy View PostOkay. Conspired with Ukraine to get political dirt on opponents. Start with today's news and work back.
Per CNN: “The whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN.”
By definition this person is not a “whistleblower” with provable evidence ready to be turned over and deserving of legal protection.
This person is someone who is spreading hearsay.
All of the rest of it is just NOISE!
The reason the acting director of intelligence did not pass on the complaint to Congress is simple: the source is not credible.
[...]
There were many first hand witnesses to the alleged phone call where the (non) whistleblower was said to have derived their facts — albeit not first hand. No one is corroborating the (non) whistleblower’s narrative.
https://townhall.com/columnists/kevi...lower-n2553460
smiley hat tip.gif to MM
Leave a comment:
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by mikewhitney, 01-20-2021, 12:06 AM
|
0 responses
9 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by mikewhitney
01-20-2021, 12:06 AM
|
||
Started by KingsGambit, 01-13-2021, 10:24 PM
|
4 responses
67 views
1 like
|
Last Post
|
||
Started by Jaxb, 01-13-2021, 01:00 AM
|
18 responses
85 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
![]()
by Jaxb
01-15-2021, 07:27 PM
|
||
Started by mossrose, 01-09-2021, 02:10 PM
|
3 responses
34 views
3 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
01-09-2021, 08:07 PM
|
||
Started by Jaxb, 01-04-2021, 12:11 AM
|
6 responses
62 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by lee_merrill
01-18-2021, 08:13 PM
|
Leave a comment: