Christianity 201 Guidelines

orthodox Christians only.

Discussion on matters of general mainstream evangelical Christian theology that do not fit within Theology 201. Have some spiritual gifts ceased today? Is the KJV the only viable translation for the church today? In what sense are the books of the bible inspired and what are those books? Church government? Modern day prophets and apostles?

This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and Christians. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” or "orthodox" for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.

Additionally and rarely, there may be some topics or lines of discussion that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine (in general Christian circles or in the TheologyWeb community) or that deny certain core values that are the Christian convictions of forum leadership that may be more appropriately placed within Unorthodox Theology 201. NO personal offense should be taken by such discretionary decision for none is intended. While inerrancy is NOT considered a requirement for posting in this section, a general respect for the Bible text and a respect for the inerrantist position of others is requested.

The Tweb rules apply here like they do everywhere at Tweb, if you haven't read them, now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Kenosis Theology / Kenotic Christology

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Thoughtful Monk View Post

    Understanding Jesus as fully God and fully man is hard. I find most people go to one or the other but just can't deal with both.

    Also on occasion, I find some of the heresy hunters are a little quick on the draw. I saw one YouTube video where they should about a 1 minute segment of a sermon by someone and declared him a false teacher because of the segment. Overlooking that one minute of a sermon is insufficient evidence of being a false teacher, the topic was to me so non-essential that I would say the guy was simply in error.
    When people find their niche they look for ways to compound success. It's true for any business. Likes & subs supporting their channels only come with views. Can't get views without being provocative and/or providing consistent content. It also becomes harder and harder to garner success in the same field "heresy hunting" when you've already reaped it clean. Now they'll start pulling off rotten fruit from an overall healthy tree and declare it cursed.


    • #32
      Originally posted by Thoughtful Monk View Post

      Understanding Jesus as fully God and fully man is hard. I find most people go to one or the other but just can't deal with both.
      At some time after resurrection, Jesus does indeed become both, "restored to the glory he had before creation" (cf John 17:5), yet without ceasing to be human. I haven't found anything in scripture to call that concept into question. Understanding how he can be both God and human is beyond me, but there are a number of other things even in physics for which I can say the same. That lack of understanding doesn't call their validity into question.
      Last edited by tabibito; 10-08-2021, 09:33 PM.
      sigpic1 Cor 15:34 εκνηψατε δικαιως και μη αμαρτανετε αγνωσιαν γαρ θεου τινες εχουσιν προς εντροπην υμιν λεγω


      • #33
        Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
        Most of those examples you cited from the West would never be confused with any sort of worship. They are signs of respect and the hat tip is often nothing more than acknowledging someone's presence. Sort of like a slight nod of the head. And a full of doffing of the hat is again merely a sign of respect.

        And obeying orders and getting paid to provide a service can hardly be considered worship of any sort.
        This is an interesting discussion. Did anyone watch Remnant Radio on this topic recently?

        I'm watching a Chinese period drama currently. From my observation and admittedly general ignorance on historical Chinese culture, something tells me the postures and acts of reverence and submission are probably very accurate for the period. And the level of reverence they give to officials and royalty definitely borders on worship, but I also don't think it's worship.

        With that said, I am not entirely sure what the deciding factor actually is for distinguishing worship from postures of reverence/submission within cultures of deeply embedded notions of honor and shame.

        What level of reverence, what sort of posturing did Daniel, for example, give Nebuchadnezzar ("oh king live forever")? Or any of the Jewish commoners to Israel's kings who likewise were deeply embedded in honor shame culture with emphatic postures of reverence and submission in the ancient near east? I see no conflict in scripture that would have suggested they couldn't distinguish the difference.

        Perhaps it's as simple as consciously acknowledging that someone is a deity?


        • #34
          In case anyone was interested. I appreciate the way they discuss these issues, strive to parse out orthodoxy, and also seek to understand what others are actually trying to say when they fail to use the right language.


          Related Threads


          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by Thoughtful Monk, 10-16-2021, 04:01 PM
          21 responses
          Last Post Sparko
          by Sparko
          Started by nico, 10-08-2021, 11:16 AM
          26 responses
          Last Post KingsGambit  
          Started by Bill the Cat, 09-29-2021, 08:31 AM
          76 responses
          Last Post NorrinRadd  
          Started by Thoughtful Monk, 09-20-2021, 08:19 AM
          28 responses
          Last Post Cow Poke  
          Started by NorrinRadd, 09-07-2021, 04:03 AM
          33 responses
          Last Post nico
          by nico