Announcement

Collapse

Biblical Languages 301 Guidelines

This is where we come to delve into the biblical text. Theology is not our foremost thought, but we realize it is something that will be dealt with in nearly every conversation. Feel free to use the original languages to make your point (meaning Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic). This is an exegetical discussion area, so please limit topics to purely biblical ones.

This is not the section for debates between theists and atheists. While a theistic viewpoint is not required for discussion in this area, discussion does presuppose a respect for the integrity of the Biblical text (or the willingness to accept such a presupposition for discussion purposes) and a respect for the integrity of the faith of others and a lack of an agenda to undermine the faith of others.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Who is Jesus? (not a theological question)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • tabibito
    replied
    The write-up here is reasonably comprehensive: though all the "as ifs" are an annoyance, the Biblical assessment itself is good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Catman
    replied
    Originally posted by foudroyant View Post
    NIDNTT: Although completely co-ordinated with God, he remains subordinate to him (cf. 1 Cor. 15:28) (2:80, God, J. Schneider).
    I'm going to post up a little of D.A. Carson, and would'nt mind at all if you put up the appropriate stanza or two (no more - we don't wanna run into copyright issues here.)

    Leave a comment:


  • foudroyant
    replied
    Like other teachings from the Bible some will still deny it anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • tabibito
    replied
    Originally posted by foudroyant View Post
    NIDNTT: Although completely co-ordinated with God, he remains subordinate to him (cf. 1 Cor. 15:28) (2:80, God, J. Schneider).
    Gutsy play by Schneider for all that scripture shows it.

    Leave a comment:


  • foudroyant
    replied
    NIDNTT: Although completely co-ordinated with God, he remains subordinate to him (cf. 1 Cor. 15:28) (2:80, God, J. Schneider).

    Leave a comment:


  • Catman
    replied
    Originally posted by robrecht View Post
    I think most of the New Testament authors would probably be fairly well characterized as subordinationists, at least some of what they said inspired honest interpretations along these lines. Nicea and Chalcedon and later councils were the result of centuries of theological reflection upon the meaning of the Incarnation.
    The author, Jonathan Swift, wrote a nice article about this. I came upon it, whilst going through some very old encyclopedias; and included it in a little book I wrote entitled: A Play On Words. (it's not published yet, but the essay I'm sure is something one might be able to Google.) It's titled simply, 'The Doctrine of the Trinity' by Jonathan Swift (1667 - 1745)

    Leave a comment:


  • Catman
    replied
    Originally posted by robrecht View Post
    The Greek verse you cited is Mt 14,28. It is not John 14,28.
    Thank you, robrecht.

    The default setting is Matthew, and my mouse has begun to show signs of age (much like the clicker), but you're spot on there old chap!

    This then is John 14:28 (NASB), from the Nestle Aland Novum Testamentum Graece : here

    28 ἠκούσατε ὅτι ἐγὼ εἶπον ὑμῖν· ὑπάγω καὶ ἔρχομαι πρὸς ὑμᾶς. εἰ ἠγαπᾶτέ με ἐχάρητε ἂν ὅτι πορεύομαι πρὸς τὸν πατέρα, ὅτι ὁ πατὴρ μείζων μού ἐστιν.
    Last edited by Catman; 08-07-2014, 07:29 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • robrecht
    replied
    I think most of the New Testament authors would probably be fairly well characterized as subordinationists, at least some of what they said inspired honest interpretations along these lines. Nicea and Chalcedon and later councils were the result of centuries of theological reflection upon the meaning of the Incarnation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Catman
    replied
    The force of the second verse, is simply quite magnificent!

    Here I am using the ESV @ biblegateway.com, for 1 Corinthians 15: 24

    24 Then comes the end, when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power.
    Once again, here is the Nestle Aland Novum Testamentum Graece: here

    24 εἶτα τὸ τέλος, ὅταν παραδιδῷ τὴν βασιλείαν τῷ θεῷ καὶ πατρί, ὅταν καταργήσῃ πᾶσαν ἀρχὴν καὶ πᾶσαν ἐξουσίαν καὶ δύναμιν.

    Leave a comment:


  • robrecht
    replied
    Originally posted by Catman View Post
    NB: The first of the two verses, is John 14:28 (for the English, I used the NASB from biblegateway.com)
    It reads as follows:

    28 You heard that I said to you, ‘I go away, and I will come to you.’ If you loved Me, you would have rejoiced because I go to the Father, for the Father is greater than I.

    As you probably know by now (referring to my 1st post to BL301), I'm more than a little intrigued by the NA28 -- so here's the same verse from the Nestle Aland Novum Testamentum Graece: here

    28 Ἀποκριθεὶς δὲ αὐτῷ ὁ Πέτρος εἶπεν· κύριε, εἰ σὺ εἶ, κέλευσόν με ἐλθεῖν πρός σε ἐπὶ τὰ ὕδατα.

    If you know me, you'll know Greek is not my strong suit -- but I know there are more than a few of ye BL301'ers who read it like it's your first languages. So, let's here from y'all then?
    The Greek verse you cited is Mt 14,28. It is not John 14,28.

    Leave a comment:


  • Catman
    replied
    Thanks, foudroyant. I was reading Dr. Carson's commentary on this same verse, and found similar ideas to those of Mounce. I do so enjoy Mounce, too.

    Leave a comment:


  • foudroyant
    replied
    From two Greek dictionaries concerning John 14:28:

    a. TDNT: Citing both John 5:18 and John 14:28 it reads:
    Nevertheless, John accepts the paradox that he is the Son who is both subject to the Father and yet also one with Him (10:30; 1:1). In other words, He is equal to the Father (3:352-353, isos, Stahlin)
    b. Mounce: Jesus declares that, "The Father is greater than I" (14:28; 15:20). This does not suggest inequality in the Trinity, but rather expresses a willing subordination of the Son to the will of the Father (Mounce's Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words, Greater, page 309).

    Leave a comment:


  • Catman
    replied
    NB: The first of the two verses, is John 14:28 (for the English, I used the NASB from biblegateway.com)
    It reads as follows:

    28 You heard that I said to you, ‘I go away, and I will come to you.’ If you loved Me, you would have rejoiced because I go to the Father, for the Father is greater than I.
    As you probably know by now (referring to my 1st post to BL301), I'm more than a little intrigued by the NA28 -- so here's the same verse from the Nestle Aland Novum Testamentum Graece: here

    28 Ἀποκριθεὶς δὲ αὐτῷ ὁ Πέτρος εἶπεν· κύριε, εἰ σὺ εἶ, κέλευσόν με ἐλθεῖν πρός σε ἐπὶ τὰ ὕδατα.
    If you know me, you'll know Greek is not my strong suit -- but I know there are more than a few of ye BL301'ers who read it like it's your first languages. So, let's here from y'all then?
    Last edited by Catman; 08-07-2014, 12:54 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Catman
    replied
    Originally posted by tabibito View Post
    When he said that, he was a man. Elsewhere, he said that "Glorify me together with you with the glory that I had before the world was."
    The statement doesn't impact on any hierarchy within the Godhead at all, because the Word subordinated himself to the Father's will, and was reduced in status.
    However, "doesn't impact" means just that - you would need to examine other areas of scripture, dealing with who he is as God before you could determine whether the Godhead has a hierarchy.
    Thank you for the reply.

    For this study, I'll only be looking at the passage from John 14 & the other from 1 Corinthians 15.

    A larger body of passages, would require numerous threads to accomplish that.

    Leave a comment:


  • tabibito
    replied
    When he said that, he was a man. Elsewhere, he said that "Glorify me together with you with the glory that I had before the world was."
    The statement doesn't impact on any hierarchy within the Godhead at all, because the Word subordinated himself to the Father's will, and was reduced in status.
    However, "doesn't impact" means just that - you would need to examine other areas of scripture, dealing with who he is as God before you could determine whether the Godhead has a hierarchy.

    Leave a comment:

widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
Working...
X