Planned Parenthood Awards Clinic For "Exceeding Abortion Visits"

[Cow Poke]

Here is one of the comments in the article to which TL refers:

"I'm a pro-choice liberal, but I must say... I thought our whole position was supposed to be that we wanted abortion to be safe, legal and RARE."

The other day, I heard a discussion of this where even one of the "Democratic Strategists" admitted, "liberals are no longer making that claim". (I'll have to remember where I heard that)

[Cow Poke]

PP Confirms Award was Given.

OK, at first it appeared this was just another "he said she said" (or she said she said) article, but when you actually go to the link posted in the link () there is a lot of "walking it back", but then THIS:

Source: PlannedParenthoodAction.org

So, no, we don’t have quotas. And, yes, we absolutely do celebrate our progress in ensuring that more people have access to the full range of reproductive health care, including abortion. And we always will.

© Copyright Original Source

So, it seems they're acknowledging the award after appearing to distance themselves from it. (They voted FOR the award before they voted against it )

Actually, they're denying they have "quotas", while commending somebody for meeting or exceeding them. I think it just goes to show what a bunch of morally bankrupt idiots they are.

[Teallaura]

PP Confirms Award was Given.

[Teallaura]

I think if it was faked we would have have been hearing so from both Planned Parenthood in general and especially the Aurua clinic.

[rogue06]

I think if it was faked we would have have been hearing so from both Planned Parenthood in general and especially the Aurua clinic.

[Cow Poke]

Yeah, it's just odd -- I'd stay away from it.

[Christy]

I can't see any pixels but it could be just on my end.

Look closely around the words. I may just be seeing something, I don't know

Liberals have better eye sight (or wilder imagination).

I'm not a liberal, I don't want the "pro-choice" side to use this to persuade people, and be like "Look, you can't trust them they fell for this hoax. They're so stupid."

[Jedidiah]

Liberals have better eye sight (or wilder imagination).

[Cow Poke]

I can't see any pixels but it could be just on my end.

Yeah, me too neither.

[Teallaura]

I can't see any pixels but it could be just on my end.

[KingsGambit]

If they say it's a fraud without giving a reason or anything, I wouldn't see a need to pay any attention to it.

[Christy]

OK, I've googled all kinds of "fake" and "fraud" and other ways to see somebody expose this as how you are portraying it. Can you show WHO is using this to "paint pro-lifers as stupid"? I've checked snopes and truthorfiction, etc...

Pro-choice people, like the ones in the comment section of the CNS site.

[Cow Poke]

Why does it say First Half of FY12 Compared to FY13? People are using this photo to paint pro-lifers as stupid for believing in it.

OK, I've googled all kinds of "fake" and "fraud" and other ways to see somebody expose this as how you are portraying it. Can you show WHO is using this to "paint pro-lifers as stupid"? I've checked snopes and truthorfiction, etc...

[Christy]

Um, it says 'first half of FY (Fiscal year) 12 compared to first half of FY13' - it's a weird comparison but a legit one.

It's written like a decrease though, having Fiscal Year 2012 compared to Fiscal Year 2013. Also, if you look at the wording, there's pixels around them that makes it look like it has been photo-shopped.

[KingsGambit]

I tend to be skeptical of Abby Johnson because I know a pro-life activist who got banned from her Facebook page for pointing out a factually incorrect argument she was making (I don't remember exactly what it was), but photo evidence counts for something in this case.