Announcement

Collapse

Pro-Life Activism 301 Guidelines

This area is for pro-life activists to discuss issues related to abortion. It is NOT a debate area, and it is not OK for pro-choice activists to post here.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Supreme Court overturns buffer zones

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Originally posted by tabibito View Post
    So - will there be another executive order?
    Besides the one where he grants amnesty to 5 million illegal aliens?

    Leave a comment:


  • tabibito
    replied
    Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
    And, in other news, they were pushing back on KING Obama --- unanimously.
    So - will there be another executive order?

    Leave a comment:


  • Teallaura
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • rogue06
    replied
    Cecile Richards (daughter of former Texas governor Ann Richards), who has been the president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America since 2006, appeared on Bill Moyers' Moyers & Company in an episode entitled "The Crusade Against Reproductive Rights"[1], where she was asked about the recent unanimous Supreme Court decision that overturned Massachusetts' free speech "buffer zone" around abortion clinics (McCullen v. Coakley).

    In her response Richard appears to declare that women getting an abortion is not really any different than a man get a colonoscopy[2] furthering the radical assertion made by many abortion supporters that an unborn baby is nothing more than a mass of tissue and removing it is similar to removing a polyp or tumor

    BILL MOYERS: What do you think will come from the court's junking of the 35-foot buffer zone?

    CECILE RICHARDS: Well, we're already seeing in Massachusetts that absolutely, immediately after that decision eliminating the buffer zone we had record numbers of protesters outside of the following women all the way up to the door of our health center in Massachusetts. These are not all kindly, elderly ladies simply whispering in the ears.

    And even if they were, it is the right of women in this country to be able to access healthcare that they need without harassment and without the advice of dozens of people outside their health center. I mean, can you imagine if, you know, if men in this country, before going into their doctor had to walk through a gauntlet of protesters telling them, you know, whether it's not to get a colonoscopy or just go down the list? It's incredible.


    The entire discussion can be read HERE -- just hit READ THE TRANSCRIPT.






    1. Broadcast on PBS on July 18

    2. An endoscopic examination that allows doctors to look at the inner lining of your large intestine using a CCD camera or a fiber optic camera on a thin, flexible tube in order to search for ulcers, colon polyps and tumors.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sparko
    replied
    Now if they would just disallow those "first amendment zones" where they make political protesters go to keep them out of sight, instead of letting them have the freedom to protest where they need to be protesting...

    Leave a comment:


  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
    Those "kings" and "queens," including the recognized liberal members like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, were unanimous on this though their reasoning was different.
    And, in other news, they were pushing back on KING Obama --- unanimously.

    Leave a comment:


  • rogue06
    replied
    Originally posted by JimL View Post
    Yes, the Kings ruled buffer zones to be unconstitutional, accept for when it comes to buffer zones that they like such as military funerals and oops, the one zoning off the Supreme court itself.
    Those "kings" and "queens," including the recognized liberal members like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, were unanimous on this though their reasoning was different.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Originally posted by JimL View Post
    Yes, the Kings ruled buffer zones to be unconstitutional, accept for when it comes to buffer zones that they like such as military funerals and oops, the one zoning off the Supreme court itself.
    EXCEPT!!!! Not ACCEPT!

    and... the "Kings"?

    Leave a comment:


  • JimL
    replied
    Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
    The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously overturned a 2007 Massachusetts law creating a 35' protest-free "buffer zone" around entrances to abortion clinics ruling the statute went too far in burdening the free-speech rights of right to life activists.

    Yes, the Kings ruled buffer zones to be unconstitutional, accept for when it comes to buffer zones that they like such as military funerals and oops, the one zoning off the Supreme court itself.

    Leave a comment:


  • rogue06
    replied
    The decision: McCullen v. Coakley

    Leave a comment:


  • Teallaura
    replied






























    (Ya do know Seer already did a thread on this, right?)

    Leave a comment:


  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Yeah

    Leave a comment:


  • rogue06
    started a topic Supreme Court overturns buffer zones

    Supreme Court overturns buffer zones

    The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously overturned a 2007 Massachusetts law creating a 35' protest-free "buffer zone" around entrances to abortion clinics ruling the statute went too far in burdening the free-speech rights of right to life activists.

Related Threads

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by The Melody Maker, 09-06-2021, 10:22 PM
3 responses
39 views
3 likes
Last Post Christianbookworm  
Working...
X