Announcement
Collapse
Pro-Life Activism 301 Guidelines
This area is for pro-life activists to discuss issues related to abortion. It is NOT a debate area, and it is not OK for pro-choice activists to post here.
Forum Rules: Here
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
"Aborted Babies Incinerated to Heat UK Hospitals" - The Telegraph
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Teallaura View PostSTD Rep for the health department.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Teallaura View PostHEY!!! My job depends on people beingstupid and irresponsible enough'sexually active' with more than one partner!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Carrikature View Post...
I don't like them either. I am pretty sure that biological waste in general needs special treatment, and afaik human remains are (and arguably should be) accorded special treatment.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Carrikature View PostIt's too bad the article's headline is such a gross misrepresentation of what's happening. It's too bad no one else here seems to have noticed.
But the obvious issue remains - if the fetus is not human for legal and ethical purposes then why is anyone surprised when 'non-human' remains are mistreated? The problem is the contradictory view that uses varying definitions dependent on political whim.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by seer View PostHow so?
From the article:
Originally posted by Christianbookworm View PostI guess we just don't like abortions period. It wouldn't be consistent to treat said remains any other way than as medical waste, correct?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Christianbookworm View PostDo some people have no SELF control? Maybe it's because I'm not interested, but is it really that hard to just no do the action that can get someone pregnant or have an STI!stupid and irresponsible enough'sexually active' with more than one partner!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Christianbookworm View PostWell, if the person who did the procedure believed that the remains shouldn't be treated as medical waste, why would he do the procedure? If the remains shouldn't be treated as waste, the life that the remains were, shouldn't have been killed either.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by seer View Post???
Leave a comment:
-
I guess we just don't like abortions period. It wouldn't be consistent to treat said remains any other way than as medical waste, correct?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Carrikature View PostIt's too bad the article's headline is such a gross misrepresentation of what's happening. It's too bad no one else here seems to have noticed.
From the article:
The bodies of thousands of aborted and miscarried babies were incinerated as clinical waste, with some even used to heat hospitals, an investigation has found....
...One of the country’s leading hospitals, Addenbrooke’s in Cambridge, incinerated 797 babies below 13 weeks gestation at their own ‘waste to energy’ plant. The mothers were told the remains had been ‘cremated.’
Another ‘waste to energy’ facility at Ipswich Hospital, operated by a private contractor, incinerated 1,101 foetal remains between 2011 and 2013.
They were brought in from another hospital before being burned, generating energy for the hospital site. Ipswich Hospital itself disposes of remains by cremation.Last edited by seer; 03-26-2014, 09:28 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
It's too bad the article's headline is such a gross misrepresentation of what's happening. It's too bad no one else here seems to have noticed.
Leave a comment:
-
I have two of the best nephews in the entire world and I wonder that in an alternate universe, they could have had their brains sucked out of a tube and their bodies used to head the abortionists shower water.
Leave a comment:
widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
Leave a comment: