First, there are points and concepts within the men's rights movements that I support and have sympathy for. However the movement itself is nothing more than feminism in reverse and has all the faults that the former has in polar opposite. Rampant misogyny instead of rampant misandry.
This seems a blatant misrep
This article (warning- MRM commenters love their naughty words for lady parts)
http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry...g-goes-native/
Says that
"feminism has always celebrated ‘female’ anger."
And gives this link as support
http://www.thenation.com/blog/172524...ists-so-angry#
But that article says the opposite.
I am not arguing the point whether or not female anger is celebrated in feminism, I think it is, as male anger is celebrated in MRMs, but the use of a link that totally doesn't support the point.
This seems a blatant misrep
This article (warning- MRM commenters love their naughty words for lady parts)
http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry...g-goes-native/
Says that
"feminism has always celebrated ‘female’ anger."
And gives this link as support
http://www.thenation.com/blog/172524...ists-so-angry#
But that article says the opposite.
I am not arguing the point whether or not female anger is celebrated in feminism, I think it is, as male anger is celebrated in MRMs, but the use of a link that totally doesn't support the point.
Comment