War Against White People

[seer]

The idea that black fathers are overwhelmingly absent and neglectful is an exaggerated myth:

Black fathers (70%) were most likely to have bathed, dressed, diapered, or helped their children use the toilet every day compared with white (60%) and Hispanic fathers (45%).

Statistically speaking, black men are less likely to be married to the mothers of their children, but they are not really less likely to be involved with their children. In many cases, they do in fact live with and apparently get along well with their children, but simply in a cohabitation situation instead of marriage.

Oh please, I don't for a minute believe that black men interact with their kids more that Whites or Hispanics. Or perhaps they have higher unemployment rates so are just home more.

[Sam]

Oh please, I don't for a minute believe that black men interact with their kids more that Whites or Hispanics. Or perhaps they have higher unemployment rates so are just home more.

This would fit perfectly with the hash tag #stuffoldwhiteracistssay.

Citing white supremacy sites, claiming that a contradictory wiki article actually says the same thing as said supremacy site, ignoring the discrimination against the black population in the criminal systems, offensively dismissing a statistic because it doesn't fit a held stereotype ... on a roll, here, seer.

[seer]

Citing white supremacy sites, claiming that a contradictory wiki article actually says the same thing as said supremacy site, ignoring the discrimination against the black population in the criminal systems, offensively dismissing a statistic because it doesn't fit a held stereotype ... on a roll, here, seer.

Sam, it's logical. If you have areas with higher crime rates you can expect more police interaction, so you will have more people caught up into they system. And there is no question that black crime rates are higher - how many poor white neighborhood do you see drive by shootings Sam? http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...urder-capital/

The vast majority of these murders are black on black. You just don't see this in largely white population. And you talk about discrimination but the most violent cities have been under "progressive" rule for the past 30-50 years. Often in very liberal states.

[Psychic Missile]

This would fit perfectly with the hash tag #stuffoldwhiteracistssay.

Citing white supremacy sites, claiming that a contradictory wiki article actually says the same thing as said supremacy site, ignoring the discrimination against the black population in the criminal systems, offensively dismissing a statistic because it doesn't fit a held stereotype ... on a roll, here, seer.

"I think the European white race and culture is the best most advanced culture/ race in history. The most prolific race when it comes to science, invention and political structure, ideals. Far surpassing any other race known to man." - Seer

[KingsGambit]

Oh please, I don't for a minute believe that black men interact with their kids more that Whites or Hispanics. Or perhaps they have higher unemployment rates so are just home more.

What specifically is wrong with this study? Any issues with the methodology?

[Kristian Joensen]

What specifically is wrong with this study? Any issues with the methodology?

It comes to a conclusion that Seer doesn't like.

[seer]

What specifically is wrong with this study? Any issues with the methodology?

Because I read things like this:

http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...-People/page11

.

Even President Obama has opined on this national conversation, creating the Fatherhood and Mentoring Initiative and making responsible fatherhood one of the key priorities of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. .

[Leonhard]

This discussion got ugly fast, I'm out.

[KingsGambit]

Because I read things like this:

http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...-People/page11

So who's not to say that the anecdotes there are wrong and the study is right? It seems like you're just cherrypicking what you do like and dismissing what you don't.

[seer]

It comes to a conclusion that Seer doesn't like.

It's not about liking anything:

Yes, There's a Black Fatherhood Crisis

By Robert VerBruggen

ThinkProgress has a post -- "The Myth of the Absent Black Father" -- claiming that the crisis is a "racially-biased" fiction. This Los Angeles Times chart is provided as evidence:


The problem, of course, is the "in similar living situations." When people speak of "father absence," they are mainly referring to the absence of fathers from the home -- that is, father absence is a "living situation." The assertion here is that, once you disaggregate by father absence, there's no racial gap in father absence.

The piece concedes that "black fathers are more likely to live separately from their children" but claims that "many of them remain just as involved in their kids' lives." "Many" is a versatile word, but nonetheless the supporting evidence is rather weak: For example, 67 percent of black fathers who don't live with their kids, and 59 percent of white fathers in the same situation, see their kids at least once a month. Much stronger evidence on the importance of living with one's kids can be found in the chart above: There is no comparison between resident dads and nonresident dads -- of any race -- on even one of the metrics.

http://www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/...risis_805.html

[seer]

So who's not to say that the anecdotes there are wrong and the study is right? It seems like you're just cherrypicking what you do like and dismissing what you don't.

OK

or instance, among fathers who lived with young children, 70% of black dads said they bathed, diapered or dressed those kids every day, compared with 60% of white fathers and 45% of Latino fathers, according to a report released Friday by the National Center for Health Statistics.

The report leaves it unclear if black fathers, on the whole, are more involved than other dads. Although the survey showed that black fathers not living at home are as involved with their children as fathers of other races in similar situations, the higher percentage of black dads absent from the home could drag down the average involvement for all black fathers, other researchers pointed out.

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/dec...-dads-20131221

[fm93]

There are more black fathers living with their children than without, and of the latter group, a higher percentage still interacts with them instead of abandoning them. None of this seems to bode with hyperbolic claims about the destruction of the black family, or that "there is something seriously wrong with that culture."

[seer]

There are more black fathers living with their children than without, and of the latter group, a higher percentage still interacts with them instead of abandoning them. None of this seems to bode with hyperbolic claims about the destruction of the black family, or that "there is something seriously wrong with that culture."

As my linked showed there is a higher percentage of black dads absent from the home. And I'm not for a moment saying that black men can not be good dads. I have known quite a few growing up. But the fact is there is a crisis in the black family, with absent fathers - and if I remember correctly even Obama did a speech about it....

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/16/us...bama.html?_r=0

BTW - where in the study did it say that there are more black men living with there children than not - I did not see that.

[Darth Executor]

What is nonsense about it? Being born into the west, into the ethnicity and gender at am puts me at a highly advantaged position compared to others. I've been aware of this since I was a little kid.

Guilting people for not being losers (which is what the talk of white privilege is) is nonsense.

[Darth Executor]

The black population, when one controls for poverty, is no more probe to criminality than the general population.

Not even remotely true. In fact the main reason why poverty correlates so much with criminality is because race correlates so much with both poverty and criminality. This is easily tested by pointing to places like Appalachia which are full of poor white people but without the same crime problems as, say, Detroit.

Nevermind that "controlling for poverty" is begging the question. Correlation does not equal causation.