Originally posted by Mountain Man
View Post
A person characterized by an overall tendency to be attracted to members of the opposite sex is "straight" / "heterosexual", whereas having an overall tendency to be attracted to members of the same sex makes a person "gay" / "homosexual", and a tendency to be attracted to members of both sexes makes a person "bisexual". In standard use, as reflected by their dictionary definitions, these words refer to overall tendencies about who a person is attracted to. While it is perfectly possible for a gay person to have sex with someone of the opposite sex (which has been a tool various ex-gay ministries have used over the years without much noticeable success), such an act likely doesn't affect whether the person has an overall tendency to be attracted to someone of the opposite sex, and thus does not change their sexuality. Likewise if a straight person has sex with someone of the same sex, the act is highly unlikely to alter their general attraction to members of the opposite sex, and thus highly unlikely to result in any change to their sexuality.
You're doing the very strange thing of treating 'homosexual' as a permanent behavioral status like 'not a virgin' or 'sinner' in the sense of "if a person has done it once then they become one permanently". That's just not how the word homosexual is used in common usage. If you want to express your ideas clearly so they are not subject to misunderstanding I suggest you use the phrase "person who has performed a same-sex sexual act" if you want to talk about that sort of thing, otherwise you are misleading people by using words quite differently to their usual meanings. To see an obvious difference, consider the case of a person who had never had sex but who finds themselves solely sexually attracted to people of the same sex. Such a person would be typically described as being both homosexual and a virgin. But in your strange definition, because the person hasn't had sex so they can't yet be a homosexual. I would note for you that as a matter of general practice, it now tends to be pretty standard for a teenager who finds themselves attracted solely to people of the same sex to tell their friends and family that they are gay years before they ever have sex. Such gay virgins would find your implication that they weren't actually gay to be ridiculous.
Your problem with definitions is apparent when you claim that:
Less than 3% of the population is homosexual
30% of all sex crimes against minors are committed by homosexuals
30% of all sex crimes against minors are committed by homosexuals
1. Less than 3% of the population reports an exclusive attraction toward members of the same-sex and no attraction to members of the opposite sex.
2. In 30% of all sex crimes against minors, the victim and the offender are of the same sex.
Those two statements are both true, but you can't directly use them together to derive any further conclusion because both statements are talking about two very different groups of people. Your error comes when you conflate those two different groups of people together by misusing the word "homosexual" for both.
A more relevant and truthful presentation of the facts is:
1b. Less than 3% of the population calls themselves "homosexual"
2b. People who call themselves "homosexual" commit sex crimes against minors at an equal or lower rate than people who call themselves "heterosexual".
3b. In 30% of all sex crimes against minors, the victim and the offender are of the same sex. The vast majority of these offenders call themselves "heterosexual" not "homosexual".
Hopefully you can see that you're being inconsistent about whether you're referring to a group that calls themselves homosexual as opposed to a group that doesn't.
An alternative way of thinking about your statements would be to rephrase them to solely talk about the behavioral aspect: "people who have engaged in sexual activity with members of the same sex". This would give:
1c. ??% of people have ever engaged in sexual activity with members of the same sex. (Where ??% is probably ~10%, but the rate is changing and the accuracy of our data on the subject is questionable)
2c. In 30% of all sex crimes against minors, the victim and the offender are of the same sex.
Unfortunately that doesn't get you anywhere, because you can't go on to draw any conclusions from it. It's like saying "soldiers kill people, and murderers also kill people" but it would be totally invalid to then conclude that "murderers are therefore soldiers" as it would be conflating two totally different groups of people and not a logical conclusion from the premises.
Comment